MYELIN - Analysis of the Vaccination Paradigm

[Guest guest]

http://www.trufax.org/vaccine/v3.html

Leading Edge Master Analysis of the Vaccination Paradigm

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

----

Some Things to Ponder

A few interesting facts and questions to ponder: much of the oral polio

vaccine (OPV) produced in the world is prepared using ground up kidney

cells from African green monkeys, at least for the last 30 years. It was

Albert Sabin himself who detected the SV-40 virus in polio vaccine. Why did

he cover it up? The very first mass oral polio vaccination campaign took

place in Ruwanda and parts of the northeastern Belgian Congo (Zaire) from

1957-1958. Over 250,000 were given the oral vaccine. Today, this area is

rampant with AIDS. This same OPV, produced by Wistar Institute in

Philadelphia, was used in Leopoldville (now known as Kinshasha, Zaire, site

of the earliest HIV sample), capital of the Belgian Congo. Interestingly,

Zaire was also the site of the 1995 outbreak of Ebola. Ruwanda was the site

of the mass murder and genocide perpetrated by the mentally aberrant

Tutsi's on the Hutu tribe, resulting in the death of 250,000 people, hacked

to death and dismembered, in 1994. Could the aggression have been created

by generations of virus-laden experimental vaccines producing post

encephalitic problems? In 1967, 31 vaccine technicians and laboratory

workers contracted Marburg virus after working with tissue from African

green monkeys, which also contains simian virus 40 (SV-40) and other toxic

organisms too expensive to screen out, such as simian herpes (B virus). It

might be mentioned that SV-40 has been linked to leukemias and degenerative

brain disease. Yellow fever vaccine is grown on chicken embryos

contaminated with avian leukosis virus, a retrovirus causing cancer in

chickens. In 1986, the World Health Organization (WHO) advised that it was

permissible for the vaccine to continue to contain avian leukosis, since it

was difficult to obtain leukosis-free chicken embryos. In the August 20,

1987 issue of Nature, page 660, a new leprosy vaccine made from armadillos

was described, in addition to the fact that the vaccine also contained

" foreign proteins, DNA and unknown retroviruses that may produce delayed

harmful effects. "

The Bottom Line on the Bottom Paradigm

When you taken into consideration the fact that many viruses, including

cytomegloviruses (CMV) are parasites of virtually every animal species, and

a major feature of CMV parasitism and many animal viruses is the latent

state in which they exist after the primary infection is resolved, and that

they can be reactivated in the body (in vivo) under the influence of

various stimuli (primary examples being environmental chemicals (especially

those derived from petroleum), heroin, cocaine, nitrates, nitrites and

inhalant drugs of abuse, or other vaccine injections of foreign proteins,

toxins, bacteria or viruses), the use of animal cell lines to make human

vaccines is criminally negligent, never mind the fact that injection of

foreign proteins and toxins directly into the bloodstream, bypassing the

natural defense systems of the body is also criminally negligent. The

evidence suggests that a methodical system has existed for knowingly and

selectively transferring slow and difficult-to-detect diseases from other

species into the human race. As a method for population control, to weed

out those considered to be " useless eaters " ? To produce disease and then

profit from treatment which is just as deadly as the disease? You decide.

Isn't it interesting that Burroughs Wellcome company in England is the

source for both immune-system-destroying amyl nitrate " poppers " , used in

bath houses by homosexuals and promoted as " air fresheners " by media

magazines, and the preferred " AIDS treatment " AZT, which is a deadly

cellular toxin and also destroys both the immune system and the human being

involved?

It is interesting to note, therefore, that since humans have been receiving

animal viruses in vaccines, and viruses (including CMV) are present in

immune deficiency syndrome ( " aids " ) in humans, and known animal viruses and

viral components are oncogenic (cancer-causing), and can cause all the

" symptoms " of AIDS, and this has been going on since the 1940's (when polio

vaccine cell cultures were first contaminated with simian virus 40 (used as

a genetic carrier in all genetic biotech products having viral particle

components), and this was well known in the medical field but suppressed

from public knowledge, and ultimately the same people who politically

control the pharmaceutical, biotech and vaccine companies also control the

medical establishment, as well as benefit from fund-raising (i.e., American

Cancer Society ,etc.) for " diseases " that never get resolved, you have a

very large conspiracy that is worth trillions of dollars to keep from

public scrutiny. That's the real bottom line. Research bears all of this

out. You are now informed, and if you don't believe that something of this

magnitude can be possible, do the research and you'll see that it is

absolutely the case. If you comment on this without checking it out, which

might involve a little work, there is nothing credible you can say. I

haven't been putting in over 80 hours of research a week for more than a

year for nothing in order to put this together.What is being done to the

world population constitutes criminal negligence of genocidal proportions.

Creating a clean biologically harmless, yet effective vaccine is not

possible - it would be just too laborious and expensive, over and above the

fact that the paradigm of vaccines is 19th century technology brought into

a 20th century illusion. It is also fraud.

The incidence of polio as a rampant plague increased 400 percent, according

to Dr. Koch, after the process of injection with serums, vaccines

and penicillin in the 1950's. In addition, the further sociological

encouragement of the spread of the disease was found by several medical

researchers to parallel the mass marketing of sugar-related products for

consumption. Sugar is extremely bad for the body, and prepared the bodies

to function as more efficient breeding grounds for the polio epidemic soon

to arrive. This was brought out briefly in 1948 by Dr.Sandler at a

Veteran's Administration Hospital in North Carolina; release of this

information was curtailed after its initial announcement brought down the

incidence of polio in North Carolina by 90%. Afterwards, people resumed

their previous habits and the incidence skyrocketed. Sandler was censured

therafter.

Between 1977 and 1980, an article came out in a major medical journal that

detailed the effort to raise $10 million in funding for internal pressure

on the Surgeon General of the United States in order to stop him from

revealing to by public, by virtue of package labeling, that the combination

of salt and sugar in virtually all pre-prepared foods cause replicative and

structural failure in DNA and RNA within the human body. Since the rate at

which DNA and RNA balance is maintained in the body is slightly higher than

the rate at which the DNA and RNA are being ripped apart in consumers, the

cause of conditions resulting from this are not immediately obvious to the

public. This information to the public was also curtailed; this was never

corrected, since the medical system was reaping large profits in " polio

dollars " , along with the tacit cooperation of the Department of

Agriculture, who was in bed with the food industries, sugar companies,

pharmaceutical industries and the Federal Drug Administration, not to

mention other ancillary agencies and the entire political community in

power then and even to this day; this relationship and problem will

continue until the public rectifies it and brings to justice all who commit

and condone this continuing crime against the population.

Rubella

Rubella is a rather innocuous (benign) infectious disease caused by a

virus. Most of the population contract this condition as a matter of course

and develop a life-long immunity to the effect of the virus without

recourse to the paradigm of synthetic immunity via injection of viral

components. Side effects from naturally contracting the virus are extremely

rare, although fetal development is subject to genetic deformity if a

female contracts the virus during the first trimester of pregnancy. The

fact that it can cause birth defects in newborn babies was seized as the

justification for a rubella vaccine, which was licensed in 1969, even

though there are indications that not all pregnant women exposed to the

virus give birth to children with congenital defects. It is estimated that

as of 1980, over 83,000,000 doses of rubella vaccine have been injected

into the population. The number of cases seems to remain stable at about 30

to 40 per year, out of a population of 250,000,000. Despite the use of the

rubella vaccine, the number of infections in women of childbearing age has

remained the same, indicating a defective paradigm.

According to statistics, it would seem that rubella vaccine has been

ineffective in eradicating the disease. Re-infection has been noted in

patients with supposed vaccine-induced immunity. The use of rubella vaccine

has pushed the effective age of rubella contraction upwards into age groups

(>15) where the presence of rubella is undesirable.

The first signs of human intolerance to the rubella vaccine surfaced soon

after its introduction in 1969. Skin rashes and abnormalities of the

lymphatic system, as well as transient episodes of arthritis in children

have been documented, as well as pain in the wrists, hands and knees. In

1970, the U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare reported that as

much as 26% of children receiving rubella vaccination in national testing

programs developed arthraligia and arthritis. Many had to seek medical

attention and some were hospitalized to test for rheumatic fever and

rheumatoid arthritis. In New Jersey, this same testing program showed that

17% of all children vaccinated developed arthralgia and arthritis. An

estimated 340,000 children in New Jersey were crippled as a result of the

rubella vaccine. The HEW also admitted that in 1969, before the rubella

vaccine was used, only 87 congenital rubella syndrome cases were reported

in the entire U.S., and that 12 of these were in New Jersey.

Inflammation of the nerves and spinal cord in 36 children was reported in

1972 following a mass rubella vaccination campaign The highest incidence of

these neurological problems was seen in preschool children and appeared up

to 42 days after injection with any type of rubella vaccine. Laboratory

analysis consistently confirmed the presence of an abnormal nerve

conduction velocity.

Recurrent problems with the joints in children 6-8 months of age became

apparent after receiving the HPV-77 rubella vaccine cultured from dog

kidney, and this problem appeared within two to seven weeks, with recurrent

attacks lasting one to seven days appearing at one to three month intervals.

As with other vaccines in the paradigm of synthetic immunity by injection,

bypassing the natural defense systems of the body, the concept that a group

of vaccinated prepubertal children will prevent the spread of rubella

appears to be invalid. In 1971, there was a rubella epidemic where over

1,000 preschool and elementary children in Casper, Wyoming contracted

rubella. Over 83% of the elementary school children and 52% of the

preschool children had been " vaccinated " against rubella virus. It is a

well known fact that the appearance of infectious diseases after the

introduction of vaccines for that disease is chronically under-reported in

the United States, mainly because such reporting would constitute a

conflict of interest. It is considered " unethical " by the medical

profession to report problems that would reflect badly on the medical

profession. Strangely, it is not considered " unethical " to suppress

symptomological data indicative of hazards from ones work that would

constitute knowledge that would benefit the population.

Incredibly, the medical profession insists on vaccinating pregnant women

with the rubella virus vaccine. Despite the fact that pregnant women are

viewed as the " high risk " group as far as exposure to rubella virus is

concerned, between 1979 and 1982 there was a great effort in the United

States to inject women of childbearing age with the rubella vaccine.

Interestingly, there was a parallel increase in cases of congenital rubella

syndrome in women of childbearing age from 1981 to 1982. In 1975, a review

was published regarding the general experience with the rubella virus

vaccine since its introduction in 1969. It was claimed that there was a

decline in reported cases of rubella and congenital rubella syndrome, and

that the vaccine provided protection. Curiously, it was also admitted that

those " vaccinated " could suffer reinfection from the virus, and that there

was a " small but significant incidence " of adverse reactions and a

" potential " risk to women who are vaccinated during pregnancy. The fact

that these supposedly " intelligent " human beings can't understand that

reality undercuts their own paradigm is absolutely incredible, especially

when it is known that natural rubella infection is almost always benign and

confers better immunity than the vaccine, and that rubella vaccination is

not justified in young children, who have undeveloped nervous systems that

are extremely sensitive to vaccine components. The rubella virus has been

recovered from peripheral blood leukocytes two years after vaccine

injection; many are sero-positive more than 8 years after vaccination. A

1985 study investigating the mechanism of " vaccine failure " in Canada

concluded that there was " a generalized lack of understanding of the nature

and significance of altered immunologic responses caused by rubella vaccine

programes. " But, they'll continue them anyway.

In 1983, the National Advisory Committee on Immunization in Canada

recommended that " the rubella vaccine should be given routinely to all

children of both sexes at 12 months of age or as soon thereafter as

possible, preferably in combination with measles and mumps vaccines, and

should be given to all female adolescents and women of childbearing age.

There are no known adverse effects following administration of vaccine to

immune women. " Rubella vaccine was contraindicated in pregnant women.

These statements seem to disregard known scientific information. If you

inject a person with one of these vaccines, loaded with foreign proteins,

non-human viral particles and carcinogenic substances, and these substances

lie around latent in the system for years, doesn't this present a potential

hazard for an unborn child to come? Of course, but these facts are

deliberately disregarded, and the public just stands by, mute and

hypnotized by this incredible line of pseudo-scientific jargon. Again, why

the emphasis on injection of human females, if in their eyes the human

females are the most susceptible to damage - unless the upper echelon of

the medical community, who has the knowledge of the effect of latent viral

particles, the actual content of the vaccines, etc., is deliberately making

the attempt to cause long-term degenerative disease in generations to come,

thereby assuring the long-term existence of the pseuo-scientific 19th

century medical paradigm. Yes, the " reptilian bastards " are at it again.

In 1984, there was a study of the impact of rubella vaccination done in

Australia that indicated that after 13 years of rubella vaccination, there

was a notable increase in the proportion of rubella sero-positive pregnant

women. Rubella vaccination of girls 12-14 years old started in 1971.

Interestingly, the study showed that 61% of girls were already immune to

rubella before vaccination and that 76% of men were immune at 18-23 years

of age. The deliberate injection of vaccines was unjustified within their

own paradigm as indicated, yet it was done anyway. A study done in 1983 on

doctors, nurses and other hospital personnel indicated an average of 53%

were not vaccinated against rubella. Over 22% of doctors in general and 9%

of obstetricians had not chosen to be vaccinated with the rubella vaccine.

The majority of screening hositals did not take measures to make general

vaccination mandatory, regardless of the category of employee. Interesting.

Do the medical personnel understand what we do and the general public

doesn't?

In 1991, it was established that rubella virus, both natural and

vaccine-introduced, has been found to play a major role in chronic fatigue

syndrome. Try and explain that to the hundreds of millions infected with

the rubella vaccine. Also in 1991, the Institute of Medicine released a

report on the adverse effects of pertussis and rubella vaccines. It

indicated a " casual relationship " between rubella vaccine and acute

arthritis in 13-15% of adult women. However, they said, " the evidence does

not provide for reliable estimates of excess risk of chronic arthritis

following rubella vaccine. " Excess risk? Why take any risk at all? The

measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine continues to be administered and

continues to cause problems in the population. In a 1991 issue of Doctor

Weekly, congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) was reported in two babies of

mothers who were vaccinated as teenagers with rubella vaccine.

Orthodoxy on Rubella

According to standard orthodox immunological description, " rubella

infection may be associated with significant morbidity (diseased states) in

adults and is associated with a high degree of fetal wastage or anomalies

if contracted in the early months of pregnancy. Because there is no

evidence that persons who have previously received the vaccine or had

rubella are at any risk of local or systemic reactions from receiving live

rubella vaccine, testing for susceptibility before vaccination is

unnecessary. " Obviously, these statements are inaccurate, based on the

evidence, and constitute fraud.

Orthodoxy on Adverse Effects of Rubella Vaccine

" Vaccinees can develop low-grade fever, rash and lymphadenopathyafter

vaccination. As many as 40% of vaccinees in large scale field trials

(experiments) have had joint pain. Arthralgia and transient arthritis occur

more frequently and tend to be more severe in susceptible women than in

children. Transient peripheral neuritic complains, such as paresthesias and

pain in the arms and legs have occurred. There is no increase risk of these

reactions for persons who are already immune when vaccinated. The vaccine

virus is not transmitted from vaccinees to pregnant susceptible contacts.

Rubella vaccine should not be given to women known to be pregnant, not

should a vaccinated women become pregnant within 3 months of a vaccination,

because of theoretical risks to the developing fetus from rubella vaccine

infection. Based on studies conducted in the U.S. and abroad, the U.S.

Public Health Service believes the risk to the fetus of vaccine-associated

malformations is so small as to be negligible. Rubella vaccination during

pregnancy should not ordinarily be a reason to recommend interruption of

pregnancy. "

" Replication of live rubella vaccine virus may be potentiated in patients

with immune deficiency diseases and by the suppressed immune responses that

occur with leukemia, lumphoma, generalized malignancy, therapy with

corticosteroids, anti-metabolites and radiation. Patients with such

condition should not be given live rubella virus vaccine, however, rubella

vaccination can be considered for susceptible HIV-infected travelers,

regardless of symptoms. "

Measles

Measles is a viral disease which is truly universal and present everywhere

on the planet. It is characterized by a self-limiting infection of short

duration, moderate severity, and extremely low fatality which has

maintained a remarkably stable biological balance over centuries. The

period from first exposure to the appearance of symptoms is about 10 days.

The characteristic feature of measles infection is the development of

multinucleate giant cells, both epithelial giant cells (which appear in the

respiratory lining) and what are called reticuloendothelial giant cells,

which generally occur in lymphatic tissues, including the tonsils, lymph

nodes, thymus and the spleen, for up to five days before the appearance of

an external rash. The second stage of measles is characterized by this

rash, which seems to occur about the 14th day after exposure, appearing

first on the trunk and then extending to the lower extremities.The rash

then fades and disappears, and improvement starts within two or three days

as the antibodies disappear in the blood. The acute phase of the disease

last for about 7 days. About 90% of all measles patients were 5 to 9 years

old before the introduction of measles vaccines. By 1955, before the

introduction of vaccines, the death rate from measles had declined 97.7%,

and measles was beginning to disappear.

Most human children acquired measles before they reach puberty. Many

studies have been done of the epidemiology of measles. One such study was

done on measle patterns in Baltimore, land on cases from 1900 to 1931.

It was concluded that when 68% of children less than 15 years of age were

immune to measles, epidemics did not occur. This is basically the concept

behind " herd immunity " . It is interesting to note that despite the fact

that in the United States measles vaccines are given to 98% of the

population, measles epidemics still occur at three to four year intervals,

uninfluenced by vaccination patterns. The fact that these epidemics always

occur, despite 98% vaccination compliance, means that the vaccination

against measles in ineffective and a fraud. Why, then, do they continue to

promote the vaccine when it is useless? Why do the epidemics continue to

occur? Why did they vaccinate for measles in the first place?

Co-factorial Subversion of the Human Immune System

It is also a well-known fact that naturally contracted measles is an

important phase in the maturation of the human immune system. Why would

anyone want to create a vaccine to stop or delay an important and

well-documented phase of human immune system development acquired through

natural contraction of a mild disease? In 1963, several kinds of " vaccine "

were introduced with the intention of preventing naturally contracted

measles. These vaccines included live attenuated measles virus and measles

virus that had been " inactivated " with formalin, administered to almost

1,000,000 people between 1963 and 1967. Soon after the introduction of

these vaccines, vaccinated children began to contract atypical measles,

which is an especially vicious form that resists treatment, as well as a

milder form of the virus with little or no rash which has the effect of

causing children to develop chronic diseases, including cancer, later in

life. It is a curious matter of record that cancer patients appear to have

a particularly small number of infectious childhood diseases in their

medical history. In 1985, studies found evidence of a relationship between

measles with a lack of rash and increased incidence of degenerative and

autoimmune diseases.

An interesting study began in 1961 in Cincinnati which followed 386

children who had received three injections of vaccine containing " killed "

measles virus. Of these 386 children, 125 had been exposed to measles and

54 of them developed the disease. A study in 1967 described the

manifestation of atypical measles in 10 children who had received

inactivated measles virus vaccine five to six years earlier. Nine of the

children developed pneumonia which resisted all treatment. Serious

reactions occurred in children first injected with inactivated virus and

then re-injected with live virus vaccines. Despite the continuing episodes

of serious local and systemic reactions to measles vaccines, and the

obvious lack of effectiveness, medical officials continued to declare that

measles vaccines were safe and effective. This constitutes fraud and

criminal negligence.

Medical authorities blamed the reports of vaccine failure and atypical

measles on " improper storage " and " children vaccinated at too young an

age " , refusing to believe that the vaccine was the problem. Those in upper

echelons knew what was happening all along, but the majority of the medical

community suffered from deliberately suppressed information, as did the

general public.

In 1973, reports of severe neurological disorders due to measles

vaccination began to roll in. One such report described 80 cases of

neurological disorders which began within 30 days after injection with

measles vaccine. The fact that 45 of these children experienced

neurological problems between 6 and 15 days after injection was a clue to

the fact that more than a " casual " link between the vaccine and the

neurological problems existed. Interestingly, this " two week " period seems

to also apply to DPT and polio vaccines, as far as symptomological response

is concerned. This is why the cut-off period for reporting adverse effects

from vaccines has been established - to avoid the period when most adverse

events actually occur. Measles vaccine can cause fatal conditions such as

ataxia (lack of coordination), retardation, hyperactivity, aseptic

meningitis, seizures, paralysis, and generalized encephalitis. It is

generally thought that the myelin around the nerves actually ends up

becoming an antigen when it is dissolved during the encephalitic process,

and intensifies the inflammatory process, but the mechanism is not fully

understood. Prior to 1900, encephalitis from childhood diseases was almost

negligible.

Those who socially manuvered themselves to be declared " medical

authorities " continue to voice the " benefits " from alleged " protection "

given by " vaccines " , yet they are indifferent to the fact that measles

epidemics continue consistently in fully vaccinated children. In the 1970's

adults began contracting measles for no apparent reason. This never

happened before the introduction of measles " vaccines " .

In 1978, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health announced " a new

effort to free the United States from measles by 1981, " and a new vaccine

initiative was launched. You will remember that the typical age of the

measles patient before the introduction of measles vaccine was 5-9 years

old. After the introduction of vaccines, 64% were older than 10 years of

age. The average age during the outbreak at the University of California

was 20-24 years - 91% of those had been vaccinated against measles. After

1981, the United States was hit repeatedly by major epidemics, thanks to

the new vaccine " initiative, " and most epidemics were in fully " vaccinated "

communities, with atypical measles presenting itself as a continuing

problem. Adults, and now babies under 2 years old, thanks to the vaccines,

were contracting measles. Furthermore, compulsory measles vaccination

programs were always done with vaccines which had always been found to be

ineffective during outbreaks of measles. As has been the consistent

pattern, medical authorities sought a semantic solution to the paradox. In

1984, they declared that a child that is in the state of being

immunologically sensitized, but not immune, is in a state of " inadequate

immunity. " Ironic, isn't it? The answer to a failed vaccine, and a failed

vaccine concept, was to vaccinate more. This circular logic persists to

this day, because people can't join together and " just say no. "

In 1985, medical authorities had the audacity to state that " sustained

transmission in a totally vaccinated community has not been demonstrated "

and " the major reason for failure to achieve elimination of measles appears

to be the fact that some persons for whom vaccine is indicated have not

been vaccinated. " This was a deliberate falsehood, and they went

unchallenged. Meanwhile, the measles virus vaccine continued to do its part

undermine the general immune system of the population.

Now, since natural immunity to measles and its contribution to the

development of the human immune system had been thwarted, and generations

of children with this so-called " inadequate immunity " would grow into

adults with no placental immunity to pass on to their children, who would

contract measles at an age when babies are normally protected by maternal

antibodies.

--------------------------------------------------------

Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA

Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UK

$$ Donations to help in the work - accepted by Paypal account

vaccineinfo@...

(go to http://www.paypal.com) or by mail

PO Box 1563 Nevada City CA 95959 530-740-0561 Voicemail in US

http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm

ANY INFO OBTAINED HERE NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE

DECISION TO VACCINATE IS YOURS AND YOURS ALONE.

Well Within's Earth Mysteries & Sacred Site Tours

http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin

International Tours, Homestudy Courses, ANTHRAX & OTHER Vaccine Dangers

Education, Homeopathic Education

CEU's for nurses, Books & Multi-Pure Water Filters