Guest guest Posted May 14, 2002 Report Share Posted May 14, 2002 Dear Forum members, Can anyone make any heads and tails out this news? I am worried now that they actually want young people to die. Population control in disguise? Please respond my American Friends. Love Maitreya E-mail: <maitreya@...> ____________________________ Birth control no solution for AIDS, U.S. argues American decision creates unlikely alliance with Islamic nations, DOUG SAUNDERS writes. By DOUG SAUNDERS Wednesday, May 8, 2002 – Print Edition, Page A7 NEW YORK -- The United States has joined an unlikely behind-the-scenes alliance on social issues with fundamentalist Islamic nations and the Vatican to oppose birth control as a solution to AIDS, as the United Nations prepares to meet today to consider a global plan to improve the conditions of children. The informal coalition forced 164 nations yesterday to engage in last-minute negotiations to work out a joint statement on the eve of the UN General Assembly's special session on children. Negotiators for other countries said U.S. officials had argued in private meetings yesterday that they would not sign any agreement that promoted birth control, even as a solution to the world's AIDS crisis. American representatives have said that the only solution to AIDS they will acknowledge or fund is sexual abstinence, both before and during marriage. The U.S. argued its position as part of a negotiating group with Iran, Libya, Pakistan, Sudan and the Vatican's Holy See, according to officials from aid organizations and national delegations. Most UN members, including Canada, have supported a version of the agreement that advocates making birth control and safe-sex education available to adolescents. Even the predominantly Catholic nations of Central and South America had backed a text that supports birth control. Even with the changes, many observers feared the United States would either not sign the international statement on Friday, when the conference is due to end, or would join other nations in signing it with written reservations. The U.S. has avoided endorsing previous agreements on children's rights, including the 1989 Convention on the Rights of the Child, because they contradict U.S. policies. The United States has joined other nations in opposing the notion of children's rights, arguing that children should be considered property of their parents, but this position did not become part of this week's negotiations, aid organization members said. Delegates said that " everything except reproductive health " had been agreed upon by member nations. The document also mentions child labour, children serving as soldiers, the trafficking of children, health care, poverty and education. Much of the U.S. opposition has been led by Helms, the Republican senator who has also made the UN his bête noir. Yesterday, speaking through a spokesman from his hospital bed, he said he was " highly skeptical " of this week's declaration. Mr. Helms has worked actively to reform the U.S. foreign aid program, to exclude work that deals with adolescent and youth sexuality. Over the past six years the U.S. has spent $500-million (U.S.) on foreign-aid programs based on sexual abstinence. ___________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.