Guest guest Posted January 25, 2002 Report Share Posted January 25, 2002 I had held some dim hope that as activists we could support some form of tiered pricing system that would allow industry to obtain somewhat higher prices from wealthy nations while developing countries could move forward with unfettered access to generically-priced AIDS drugs. Several issues have arisen that take that negotiating point off the table. First is the UNAIDS pharmaceutical slush fund. The recent conference in Ouagadougou made no mention of parallel imports or compulsory licenses. It would appear that this erstwhile noble concept, aside from being brutally underfunded, is going to be little more than a shifting of cash from nations and organizations into the coffers of pharma. Second is the recent increase in the cost of AIDS drugs as much as 5-10% in the midst of a recession and serious budget cuts being faced by many state governments. The effect on ADAP and Medicaid state formularies is NOT going to be a boon to the health of people with AIDS. In addition, such squeezing of funds will assure that access to other interventions, such as dietary supplements like carnitine, acetylcarnitine, protein powders, coenzyme Q10 and so forth, will be eclipsed. These types of interventions have data supporting their use in offsetting the hideous and potentially fatal side effects of ARV use. Clearly, despite agreements made between industry and the Fair Pricing Coalition, their word is not to be trusted. This is consistent with past behavior. Even the first hard-won drop in the price of AZT years ago from the then Burroughs Wellcome was offset by an increase in the price of acyclovir. The industry has displayed a consistent pattern of deceit and shady business practices, resulting in massive increases in prices to which Americans hitherto have had little recourse (short of costly trips to Canada or Mexico). Clearly, they have little regard for the mere voices of AIDS activism. And little shame in their activities. They have had no compunction about threatening nations' right to seek compulsory licenses with sanctions--and sweet talking others with bribes. Yet still, 8,000 people die every single day, in large measure because of their greed. As a result, I propose that we begin a grassroots campaign to lobby ADAP and Medicaid officials to seek parallel imports or compulsory licenses as a point of leverage and out of economic necessity to obtain the lowest possible price for ARV medications. I look forward to lively discussion. Although, having raised this on the CST list, I fear that many of the upper echelon of activists have been compromised by the conflicts of interest that are faced by their respective organization's heavy reliance upon pharm industry funding and thus will remain either silent or find reason to oppose this campaign. Comments? M. E-mail: <gmc0@...> ______________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.