Guest guest Posted July 28, 2008 Report Share Posted July 28, 2008 In a message dated 7/28/08 9:59:25 AM Eastern Daylight Time, robert-blau@... writes: > It's a little hard to believe that, including both that a major researcher > at Columbia Medical School is on their payroll AND Mike has been duped > by them I know Josh, who responded to me with the information. He is involved in researching the best products and he checks everything. It is easy to be fooled and even people like Mike are not immune from being duped. Everything Josh wrote, which I posted here, is something I take seriously. ************** Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for FanHouse Fantasy Football today. (http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 1, 2008 Report Share Posted August 1, 2008 OK, my friend, a holistic MD who is very familiar with New Chapter and their products writes: " There are an enormous number of studies that have been done on Zyflamend, showing in detail its mechanisms of action. Most of these mechanism studies have been done at MD Experimental Cancer research lab and not by the researcher from Columbia. Almost all pharmaceutical or herbal research is funded in part by the parties who supply the products. Someone has to pay for the work to be done. It is the role of peer-review journals to review this work to see that it is valid none the less. Rather than voice a baseless bias against Zyflamend and New Chapter (which makes me wonder whether there isn't some financial connection to a competing company?) I would suggest looking through the worlds published literature on Zyflamend. One will be hard pressed to find a criticism of the methodologies used in these peer-reviewed studies…… There are facts, published in peer review journals and there are opinions with little foundation…… I am sure that the folks at NCI would be happy to provide any links to published articles if the reader has difficulty pulling up the afore mentioned studies. I would contact Taryn Forelli N.D. who is in charge of such things…. " No disrepect, but I am inclined to take the word of someone like him and Mike over your Josh in the absence of something more substantial than somewhat vague allegations. > > In a message dated 7/28/08 9:59:25 AM Eastern Daylight Time, > robert-blau@... writes: > > > > It's a little hard to believe that, including both that a major researcher > > at Columbia Medical School is on their payroll AND Mike has been duped > > by them > > I know Josh, who responded to me with the information. He is involved in > researching the best products and he checks everything. It is easy to be fooled > and even people like Mike are not immune from being duped. Everything > Josh wrote, which I posted here, is something I take seriously. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.