Guest guest Posted January 6, 2008 Report Share Posted January 6, 2008 Effect of anastrozole (Arimidex) on bone mineral density after one year of treatment: results from bone sub-study of the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study (IBIS-II). http://www.abstracts2view.com/sabcs/view.php?nu=SABCS07L_270 Singh S, Cuzick J, R, Blake G, Truscott J, J, Eastell R, Howell A. Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, London; Kings College School of Medicine, London; University of Leeds, United Kingdom; University of Newcastle, Australia; Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom; Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom Background: The third generation aromatase inhibitors have been shown to reduce bone mineral density when compared with tamoxifen in the advanced, adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings in women with early breast cancer. No trial to date has compared the effect of anastrozole treatment versus placebo on bone mineral density in the prevention setting. Materials and Methods: The bone sub-protocol of IBIS-II assessed changes in the bone mineral density in postmenopausal women aged 40-70 years with a high risk of breast cancer receiving anastrozole (Arimidex ) 1 mg/day versus placebo for 5 years. Out of 1540 women recruited to date in the prevention study, 613 women have taken part in the bone sub-protocol of the study. Lumbar spine and femoral neck bone mineral density have been assessed at baseline and 1 year by DEXA scans for 250 women at the time of analysis. Results are expressed as mean percentage change. Out of 250 women, 162 with normal bone mineral density joined stratum-I of the study and received only monitoring without bisphosphonate treatment, 59 osteopenic women joined stratum-II and were further randomised to receive either risedronate or placebo, 29 osteoporotic women joined stratum-III of the study and all received treatment with risedronate. Results: In stratum-I, a greater bone mineral density loss was observed in the anastrozole vs placebo group at both the lumbar spine (-2.5% vs. -0.97%; P= ..002), and total hip (-1.34 vs. -0.37%; P= .02). In stratum-II, women randomised to risedronate (Actonel) had higher bone mineral density scores both in the anastrozole and in the placebo arm. The bone mineral density changes were (risedronate vs. non-risedronate group; Spine 0.32% vs. -0.17%, P=0.75, Hip 0.67% vs. -2.27%, P= .01) in the anastrozole arm, and (Spine 0.84% vs. -0.25%, P=.36; Hip -0.35% vs. -1.2%, P=.23) in the placebo arm. In stratum-III, the BMD (bone mineral density) changes observed were (Spine 1.8% vs. 4.17%, P= .03; Hip -0.13% vs. 1.5%, P=.06) in the anastrozole and placebo group, respectively. Discussion: Women with normal bone mineral density at baseline had a significant bone mineral density loss with anastrozole treatment. However, women on anastrozole, who joined the trial with an osteopenic or osteoporotic T-score, gained bone mineral density after receiving risedronate treatment for a year. This data confirms the bone mineral density losses observed with third generation aromatase inhibitors on breast cancer patients, but it is also reassuring that bone mineral density loss can be controlled if women receive DEXA scans at baseline and bisphosphonate treatment as needed along with aromatase inhibitors. Longer-term follow-up and analysis on more bone mineral density data is required to confirm the above results. These data will be further updated at the time of meeting. * ASK YOUR DOCTOR FOR A BASELINE BONE DENSITY (DEXA) SCAN BEFORE STARTING TREATMENTS (Breast Cancer Options) ************** Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape. http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.