One more thing on DSM rewrite...

[Guest guest]

Laurie and I thought this was an interesting commentary on the DSM definition of

autism. I think the jury is out on this...will continue to monitor and share

information as we get it.

Laurie and Ellen

Experts working to develop the new DSM definition are sharply refuting the new

analysis,(that the change in definition would bump many out of services.) They

pointed out to The Times that the report relies on data collected in 1993 and

said that other estimates have indicated the changes would affect far fewer

people.

In a statement released late Friday, the American Psychiatric Association said

field tests of the proposed changes indicate that there will be no variation in

the number of individuals treated for autism should the revisions go into

effect.

" The proposed criteria will lead to more accurate diagnosis and will help

physicians and therapists design better treatment interventions for children who

suffer from autism spectrum disorder, " said Scully, medical director of

the American Psychiatric Association.

What's more, the organization said the public will have another opportunity to

weigh in on the potential changes. The psychiatric association will open up an

additional public comment period this spring.

Ellen Garber Bronfeld

egskb@...