Guest guest Posted October 24, 2002 Report Share Posted October 24, 2002 Qualifications for Physicians Who Care for Patients with HIV Infection Background The onslaught of the HIV/AIDS epidemic in the early 1980s brought with it major challenges to the nation's health care system. In those early years, internists and family practice physicians and others from a variety of medical disciplines joined those with specialized training in infectious diseases to use the limited tools then available in medicine to care for individuals with HIV disease. Many of these physicians from the ranks of general medicine remain leaders in the clinical care of people living with HIV disease. Any effort to identify and/or credential physicians who are experts in the treatment of HIV disease must acknowledge the historical and ongoing contributions of these physicians as well as those who come from the specialty ranks of infectious diseases. In the last five years dramatic progress has been made in the development of treatments to extend health and life for people with HIV disease. Scientific and medical developments have made treating HIV disease vastly more sophisticated and complex than it once was. Physician education and training related to new developments in the field and ongoing experience working with patients with HIV disease are essential to ensure that these patients get optimal care. The changing health care system, with its myriad delivery and financing mechanisms, has highlighted the importance of access to specialized care. The HIV Medicine Association (HIVMA) of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) offers the following guidance to public and private health care payors and institutions to identify and recruit health care professionals with expertise in HIV disease. Our goal is to assist these organizations in ensuring that patients with HIV disease receive the highest quality of care that reflects the most current medical research at the hands of those who have demonstrated experience and commitment to treating this disease. The guidance we offer is intended to allow flexibility, based on the special circumstances of any given community or institution relative to the prevalence of HIV disease and the availability of physicians to treat patients with HIV disease. In addition, this guidance may be viewed and implemented in the context of existing state or other institutional guidelines related to continuing medical education. Qualifications HIVMA believes that an HIV-qualified physician should manage the care of patients with HIV disease. There is ample evidence in the research literature that care by experienced HIV providers translates into improved clinical outcomes. In defining HIV-qualified physicians, one must take into account both the training and expertise of infectious disease specialists and pediatric infectious diseases specialists, as well as the expertise and experience of physicians from a variety of medical disciplines who have made a significant professional commitment to HIV/AIDS care and who care for tens of thousands of patients with HIV disease. HIVMA believes that an additional certification examination process is not necessary to identify the expertise of an HIV-qualified physician and to ensure access to high quality HIV care for HIV- infected patients. Rather, we propose that any credentialing process to identify HIV- qualified physicians be based on a combination of patient experience and the demonstration of ongoing education and training in HIV care, especially in the area of antiretroviral therapy. In the case of communities or geographic areas where no physicians meeting these criteria are available, a primary care physician should have an established consultative relationship with at least one physician meeting the criteria outlined below. To be an HIV-qualified physician, an individual should be able to show continuous professional development through: Clinical management of at least 25 HIV- infected patients within the last year (Numbers of patients may vary depending upon the concentration of HIV-infected patients in a given community). A minimum of 15 hours of HIV-specific CME (including a minimum of 5 hours related to antiretroviral therapy per year). Recently trained infectious diseases (ID) fellows or those recently certified or recertified in infectious diseases should be considered qualified providers of patients with HIV/AIDS. However, given the rapid pace of change in HIV medicine, board certification in infectious diseases and pediatric infectious diseases does not guarantee sufficient knowledge to assure that an ID specialist will remain an expert in HIV disease over time. Therefore, all physicians (including ID and pediatric ID physicians) should meet the experience and education based criteria outlined above to retain their HIV- qualified status. Relationship between HIV Provider Experience and Patient Outcomes Selected References AIDS mortality rates lower at sites with HIV experience. AIDS Alert 1999:14(11): 129-30. Bach PB, Calhoun EA, CL. The relation between physician experience and patterns of care for patients with AIDS-related Pneumocystis carnii pneumonia: results from a survey of 1,500 physicians in the United States. Chest 1999; 115(6): 1563-9. Brosgart C et al. Community patterns of care for HIV disease: experience makes a difference. Int Conf AIDS 1998; 12:1143-44. Brosgart CL et al. Clinical experience and choice of drug therapy for human immunodeficiency virus disease. Clin Infect Dis 1999; 28 (1): 14-22. Hecht FM et al. Optimizing care for persons with HIV infection. Society of General Internal Medicine AIDS Task Force. Ann Intern Med 1999; 131(2): 136-43. Kitahata MM, Van Rompaey SE, Shields AW. Physician experience in the care of HIV-infected persons is associated with earlier adoption of new antiretroviral therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2000; 24(2): 106-14. Kitahata MM et al. Physicians experience with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome as a factor in patients' survival. NEJM 1996; 334(11): 701-706. Laine C et al. The relationship of clinic experience with advanced HIV and survival of women. AIDS 1998; 12(4): 417-424. Markson LE et al. Repeated emergency department use by HIV-infected persons: effect of clinic accessibility and expertise in HIV care. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr & Human Retrovirology 1998; 17(1): 35-41. Shapiro M et al. Variations in the care of HIV-infected adults in the United States. JAMA 1999; 281:2305-2315. Willard CL, Liljestrand P, Goldschmidt RH, Grumbach K. Is experience with human immunodeficiency virus disease related to clinical practice? A survey of rural primary care physicians. Arch of Fam Med 1999; 8(6): 502-8. http://www.hivma.org/HIV/HIVMA/HIVProviderDef.htm ___________________________________ HIV Medicine Association (HIVMA) 66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600 andria, VA 22314 Phone: (703) 299-1215 Fax: (703) 299-0473 hivma@... ______________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 30, 2002 Report Share Posted October 30, 2002 Dear Dr Naik, I fully agree with you that India needs trained HIV physicians. It is high time our unversities rise to the need for diploma and MD degree courses in HIV Medicine. When Leprosy was given its special due, much attention was focussed on various aspects of the disease and National Leprosy programmes were successfully implemented. Dr HR Jerajani Mumbai E-mail: <jerajani@...> ____________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 1, 2002 Report Share Posted November 1, 2002 Dear colleagues, I fully agree with Prof. Maniar, particularly the second paragraph. Since there is no specialised MD degree for HIV/ADS, as of now all doctors who are having AIDS management experience are qualified to manage the patients n future too. I being a medical doctor and MD in Medical Microbiology managing several AIDS patients (for which I am legtimized y Medical Council of India/Delhi) beter than hundreds of MDs in medicine in rural India who, for whatsoever reason, do not know even basics of AIDS management and refer patients to AIIMS or other tertiary care hospitals. Why?, if MD medicine degree is the only criteria?. Dr. Sarman Singh, MD. MNAMS Head, Division of Clinical Microbiology Department of Laboratory Medicine All India Institute of Medical Sciences P.O. Box. 4938, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi-110 029 India, Phone: 659 4764, 659 4977, 652 8484 Fax: 686-2663, 652 1041 E-mail: <ssingh56@...> __________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 3, 2002 Report Share Posted November 3, 2002 Respected All memebers of the community, To add further to the discussion - I think we need 2 category of professionals to manage the AIDS epidemic A) professionals with trg included in the MBBS & MD curriculum (as part of Inf diseases) who are expected to recognise OI and other routine infections in the community and may treat/refer them to the nearest specialised centres or even Appex Hospitals designated for the purpose. HAART/PMTCT may be started in the specialised centres where APs/Registrars and others senior people in the unit take care of the neccessity of when and what to start HAART and also possibly decide when to stop the HAART. The follow up and maintainence phase is back in the community More MDs trained in Public Health to manage and adminster the programme in the community where the componenet of i) treatment of OIs and other infections is taken care of ii) continuation and follow up of HAART iii) counselling and VCT iv) Linkages thru the SACS, NGOs and the referral hospital for tracking the HIV+/AIDS patients V) IEC activities, and other TI/programms aimed at prevention of spread of HIV in the community If proper, adequate and complete information is given to an HIV+ and his carers/family members as to what to do incase of illness and whom/where to approach, then even the pvt practictioner/RMP and other people claiming themselves as HIV specialists in a village/small town can be bypassed. One time counselling contact is insufficent to expect the carers/HIV+ to adopt safe practices and alos to remember other aspects of care. Regular and repaeted counselling sessions are required to ensure that HIV+ and his family understand that we mean the best for him In any new and emerging diseases, it is always that certains professional memebers do recognise it as an future opportunity and do gain early expertise in management of the disease without a formal degree. However, these very professionals as they age with disease, must help in formalising the capacity build in an adequate and appropriate manner. Thus the role of such 'peers' is extremely crucial and should not be ingnored, rather utilised benefically for future development of response. So is the case HIV+/AIDS This will ensure a uniformity of treatment, follw up, continuim of care and support to the family. Other componenets of drugs availabilty and supply could be built into the process Thank you all for patient reading Dr HS Ratti, MD E-mail: <ratti2@...> ____________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.