Guest guest Posted October 26, 2002 Report Share Posted October 26, 2002 It is that Geoffrey from Australia again just a little over half way round the country (9 states out of 11 this trip). I have been practicing in counselling care support and treatment advocacy together with some specialised peer education and positive speaker training over a period of 12 years. I have provided terminal care in a home setting as part of a team and have participated in assisting families in anticipatory grief before their loved ones actually die and facilitated terminal patients to make some preparatory decisions as to how they want their funerals held and what memorials might look like. I am not making this offering as a brag list but simply to contrast this range of experience and competencies with those that are offered in the formal Bachelor, Post Graduate, and Masters degrees which are often the minimum standards for consideration when organisational appointments are being considered. In addition to the formal recognised qualifications for medical practitioners which go without saying, and the capacity and clinical experience expected from primary health care services, I consider that the same rigourous but non necessarily academic dependent specifications be applied to the criteria for appointment to advertised organisational positions as well. So often I have read job descriptions that I believe I could fill from the experience but after reading the long list of minimum standards I would not even consider applying, mostly due to the fact that to get the experience I sacrificed the formal academic study time and lack the formal credentials. History has shown of course that the first course that the successful applicants embark on is to engage experienced people to actually make the wheels of the organisation turn or alternatively start them turning in an academically sound direction that is counter productive to the needs of service users, not deliberately of course, but mostly out of ignorance and the lack of practical modules in the formal training. I guess that this also has a bearing on accreditation as well. I am also being increasingly concerned as to what constitutes a " key stakeholder " because there is a blur in my vision particularly in India as to whether those who are " key stakeholders " are being raised from the ranks of those whose stakes are being held or whether there is another career path process in place. No where is this more apparent than when one looks at the " key stakeholders " who prognosticate on harm reduction in injecting drug use who are so far removed from the actual behaviour as to potentially skew the priorities. I therefore seek to flag that when international forums are convened and invitation lists are forwarded that the " key stakeholders " be identified so that the list can be vetted by those whose lives are likely to be most affected. Often of course they are cost prohibitive for those most qualified as well. I guess this goes beyond the brief of the Indian Medical Association but in relation to the readers of this list it can become a matter of life and death. Geoff Heaviside Brimbank Community Initiatives Inc Sponsoring Sunshine Budget Advisory Service 5 Brisbane Street P.O. Box 606 Sunshine 3020 . Australia. Ph: 0418 328 278 Ph/Fax : (03) 9311 5052 or in India Mr Geoff Heaviside Flat #10 Kash Towers 93 South West Boag Road T.Nagar, Chennai INDIA 600017 Ph: (91 44) 4329580 Mobile : (91) 9840 097 178 E-mail: <gheaviside@...> ___________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.