Guest guest Posted September 2, 2002 Report Share Posted September 2, 2002 Dear Members, Why is Kerala talking of " high risk groups " when it is the behaviour that needs to be addressed. All truck divers do not practice high risk nor do all housewives have sex only with their husbands. We also know that a study in TN showed that 90% of the HIV +ve women were married and monogamous and their single risk factor was their husbands. Are the women a " high risk group " ? Besides stigmatising certain groups, the approach makes others feel they needn't worry as they are not a " high risk group " , whatever their behaviour might be !! Again, why are " expatriates " being singled out for high levels of HIV in Kozhikode and Thiruvananthapuram? It will result in stigmatisation is in other places where migrants (immigrants, returning migrants) are stigmatised. From a prevention angle, is the minister saying that if you are not expatriate you are not at risk? One might interpret what he says like that !! If you think I am talking out of my hat, here's a live example. Other members might have experiences to add that might underline the point I am trying to make..In Nepal, people talk about " Bombay-returned-girls " or Nepali girls who go to Bombay to do sex work, similarly. The NGOs' IEC materials also show the way HIV to be transmitted..from client to sex worker in Mumbai to husband or boyfriend in Nepal when they return. With what result......BTG's are stigmatised, those girls and men who remain in their villages have as much unprotected sex as before and don't consider themselves at risk as they have not been to Mumbai and of course Nepali girls going to do sex work in other cities don't seem worried that having unprotected penetrative multipartner sex places them at risk of infection, as long as they are not in Mumbai. Also, why do people disappear after a test and getting their result? Might is be because they will be labeled as they are " expatriates " or " high risk groups " ? May be many more people would come for testing and access the " unique " services the government and others provide if an environment that is supportive, non-discriminatory, non-judgmental and non-stigmatising is facilitated. Can someone from KSACs or the MOH explain? Regards, Jo Chandy E-mail: docnep@... ___________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.