Guest guest Posted December 9, 2008 Report Share Posted December 9, 2008 Hi all, Just wanted to let you know how my appointment with the professor went today. I went to see him, as we needed to talk about further treatment of my scar tissue. The scar tissue build up in my " new esophagus " is pretty extreme and needs further treatment besides the " normal " dilatations. This professor told me this morning that having had 18 dilatations until now after my -ectomy on 31 March last is really a lot and not every day business. The narrowing caused by it is pretty extreme, but... it's something that simply occurs in some cases and I happen to be one of them again (ha ha, lucky me... not). There are 4 options, according to the professor. Option one is proceeding like we have untill now: dilatation after dilatation, until the scar tissue stops growing and stops closing things up. It will work in the end, but it will take a whole lot of time before it's over and done with. So not the best option. Another option is removing the adhesion area and replacing it by a piece of the intestines. Huge surgery and absolutely out of the question for me, especially regarding the fact that option 1 might work as well. The professor agreed, but just wanted to let me know that that also was an option. So: we're not going for that one. Now it gets more interesting... The third option is cutting away the scar tissue at the adhesion area, so not just making incisions in it, but really removing it. It's a small procedure (about 15 minutes), done through endoscopy. It's done using Propofol (same as I get during the dilatations) and after a few hours I'm allowed to go home and things will hopefully be better. Success rates: 50/50. Complications are about the same as with dilatations, so nothing for me to worry about honestly. Should I once again belong to the group where things fail: nothing lost, as things won't get worse by this procedure, it might only leave me at the same point as where I am at right now. The fourth option is placing as stent. This stent works as a long lasting dilatation and give a great success rate. Nevertheless I would have a metal tube in my " new esophagus " (though it is a small procedure as well, also performed through endoscopy) and the things needs to be gotten out some day as well. It doesn't remove the d... scar tissue, it pushes it aside. All in all we weighed things together, just using common sense, and together we decided to have a go for the third option. So we're going to try to cut the tissue away and let's keep our fingers crossed that this once I belong to the lucky ones and the tissue won't grow back. It's all we can do now. Hope. There are no guarantees. But when you lose hope, what's left for one? I better be patient and go through this. If it doesn't work, the appointment for the stent will be made immediately. There's nothing for me to lose here, so let's just think I'll win. Oh by the way, this was the first time I saw this professor. He's a pretty young doctor to be a professor, but very very specialised and I have complete faith in him. He has treated over 1000 (!!!) -ectomy patients untill now and told me he had dealt with cases like mine before (scar tissue wise that is, not achalasia wise, but this isn't about achalasia, is it?). He told me he had never seen a case like mine that hadn't been solved by one of the upper options. He told me to stay positive, keep having faith and never lose hope. He told me we're going to make it. Next Wednesday (17th December) I'll have another dilatation (as a bridge to the procedure) and Wednesday January 7th I'll have the tissue removed. Of course I'll let you all know how things proceed. Love, Isabella Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.