Guest guest Posted December 7, 2008 Report Share Posted December 7, 2008 Hi Notan, As promised I asked Dr. Gockel more info on this subject. Yesterday evening she replied that she had been very busy last week due to a congress she co-organised and had to attend of course. This week she's in the operating room a lot and therefore hasn't got enough time to give you the best possible answer untill coming weekend, this as it is complicated stuff that she really needs to look into. I'll let you know as soon as I know more. Isabella ________________________________ From: Isabella Arnold <arnoldisabella@...> achalasia Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2008 8:37:31 AM Subject: Re: Reason for slow progression? Well, Notan, I guess that's a question for Dr. Gockel... I'll forward this message to her and let you know the answer I receive. Love, Isabella ____________ _________ _________ __ From: notan ostrich <notan_ostrich@ cox.net> achalasia@grou ps.com Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2008 2:25:03 AM Subject: Reason for slow progression? I found the results of my blood test. I have low IgG. (IgG is the main type of antibodies.) Not low enough to be causing me problems with infections but below the normal range, aprx. 500 or 600 if I heard right. So, once again I have another odd condition but at least it doesn't seem to be causing me any problems. Anti-neural antibodies have been found in achalasia patients. However, the nature of these antibodies is that they don't seem to be specific against the neurons that are effected in achalasia and so it is though that they may not represent the cause of achalasia. However, perhaps they are part of a group of factors stressing those neurons, such as, a virus hiding in them, inflammation from allergies and even the NOS the neurons produce. If so, then perhaps my low IgG is why my achalasia took so many years to progress. I wonder if Isabella's researcher would have any thoughts on this? Antineuronal antibodies in idiopathic achalasia and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (2003) http://www.pubmedce ntral.nih. gov/articlerende r.fcgi?artid= 1773656 " In general, the antibodies in achalasia serum were specific to enteric nerves, but were not specific to subpopulations of enteric neurones. These results bring into question the theory that antineuronal antibodies are a principal aetiological factor in the development of idiopathic achalasia. If this were the case, we would have expected specificity to nitrergic neurones located in the oesophagus and LOS, and we would not expect to detect comparable immunostaining with serum from GORD patients. " notan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.