Guest guest Posted February 11, 2012 Report Share Posted February 11, 2012 I came across this today and had to share it because it applies to recent discussions. Abstract: In vivo mapping of hydrogen peroxide and oxidized glutathione reveals chemical and regional specificity of redox homeostasis. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22100409 " A longer life span correlated with increased formation of oxidants in the gut, rather than a decrease. " Other than that quote the terminology is going to make the language of that abstract hard to understand for many. In that case, and because it is only an abstract the following news article with comments from one of the authors may be more interesting. Oxidative Stress: Less Harmful Than Suspected? ScienceDaily (Dec. 5, 2011) http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/12/111205102627.htm They did their research on fruit flies and fed them, " N-acetyl cysteine (NAC), a substance which is attributed an antioxidant effect and which some scientists consider suitable for protecting the body against presumably dangerous oxidants. " What they found was that NAC actually caused the mitochondria of " various tissues to significantly increase oxidant production. " So what do they think this means? I think that they think it means more work needs to be done. Of course some who want to hold on the the speculation that we need to take extra antioxidants will speculate that this research is wrong or does not apply to humans. Those that want to believe that the push to take more antioxidants is wrong will speculate that it supports their belief. I speculate that some entertainers, authors and business are going to take their time getting around to telling their fans and customers about this side of the research. I also speculate that the body may actually use oxidants (the byproduct of processes, or even needed by some processes) as messengers that certain processes are happening or can happen. If that message is not loud enough it will try to increase those processes or not down regulate the those process as much as it should. So, increasing antioxidants beyond normal may cause the body to increase certain process beyond what they should be. All this is speculation. I offer it to provoke thought. One of the things I like about this study is that it shows how far science has come in developing tools to get the answers and yet even with these tools the complete answer is still out of reach. We can look through a bigger crack in the wall than we could in past times, but we have to speculate about what we see because to much is still out of view. Some speculation will be right and some wrong but often it will be given to us as the absolute truth, sometimes " secret truth " about how we should live and eat, while pointing fingers at someone to blame. It sells well. Even researchers are not immune to crossing over the line and either consciously or unconsciously turning speculation about their work into claimed truth. Sometimes even making fraud to carry it off. Along those lines consider this: Scientific Journals Notified Following Research Misconduct Investigation http://today.uconn.edu/blog/2012/01/scientific-journals-notified-following-resea\ rch-misconduct-investigation/ " ... concludes that Das is guilty of 145 counts of fabrication and falsification of data. " " Das had gained attention in recent years for his work into the beneficial properties of resveratrol, which is found in red wine. " This does not mean that all research into red wine is false. There is a lot more, than just his, which sill stands. Back to antioxidants: Moderate exercise is an antioxidant: upregulation of antioxidant genes by training. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18191748 " We have found that interfering with free radical metabolism with antioxidants may hamper useful adaptations to training. " Notice the word " may. " For a look at speculation whether antioxidants are good or bad in this case see: Reactive Oxygen Species in Skeletal Muscle Signaling www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3235811 That review of research looks at how oxidative stress may be both good and bad and therefor antioxidants are both good and bad. I think for now I will try to get " normal " amounts of them, whatever that is, but I am sure taking large amounts in supplements is not normal. notan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.