Guest guest Posted July 31, 2001 Report Share Posted July 31, 2001 What I don't understand is why they focused on negative aspects through half the article, but failed to come to any kind of a negative conclusion or even a caution. Also, there _ARE_ studies that have found long-term use of Prozac causes brain damage. It's showing up in a percentage of the people that have been on Prozac for 10 years or longer. And there is research out there that has found an increased risk of cancer in people who use antidepressants. (It ought to be treated like hGH) The research is out there, but for some reason it just doesn't get into the hands of people that are dealing with related research, so a lot of research is wasted. I don't understand why research is accepted as credible, when it doesn't take into account other research related to it. It's like instead of building on one another, they just go around doing the same experiments. And I can see some value in it when it confirms someone else's research. But when they don't even seem to be aware of the research of each other, they are hardly confirming each other's research. And one additional note. The article mentioned the possibility that Prozac may possibly be somewhat neurotoxic. As PWC's, we already have problems with neurotoxicity. Why add more potential neurotoxins to our problem? And is it possible that antidepressants are contributing to our symptoms? The discussion about PWC's with excess seretonin that's been discussed through this list gives rise to some concerns I have with using SSRI's above and beyond the concerns about possible neurotoxic problems. I've been on antidepressants, and experienced some very severe side-effects from them that have soured my opinion of them. The article didn't mention much about this, and so far as I know, scientists can't come up with an explanation for those side effects. Playing around with brain chemistry is like experimenting with street drugs. Until they can come up with a definitive way to evaluate who will have those side effects, or how those side effects occur, I think there needs to be a lot more caution about the use of antidepressants, and I'm alarmed that it is dispensed like candy. I have the fear that eventually I'm going to be living in a nation full of brain damaged individuals. And I fear that PWC's that have depended on antidepressants may find that they have irreparable brain damage when a cure is finally found for our problem. lindaj@... Interesting Serotonin Article > In the July issue of Discover Magazine: > http://www.discover.com/recent_issue/index.html > > Click on July 2001. The title of the article is Serotonin Surprise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 2001 Report Share Posted July 31, 2001 Hi! There's a simple solution. Quit taking them. If you've been on them a long time, find a health care practitioner that will help you get off them. There are health care practitioners out there who refuse to prescribe them. I don't take any prescription drugs. I'm 59 with diagnosed CFS since 1997, (probably got it in 1990) and I'm probably doing better than most postees on medication. Merle wrote: > What I don't understand is why they focused on negative aspects through half > the article, but failed to come to any kind of a negative conclusion or even > a caution. Also, there _ARE_ studies that have found long-term use of Prozac > causes brain damage. It's showing up in a percentage of the people that have > been on Prozac for 10 years or longer. And there is research out there that > has found an increased risk of cancer in people who use antidepressants. (It > ought to be treated like hGH) The research is out there, but for some reason > it just doesn't get into the hands of people that are dealing with related > research, so a lot of research is wasted. I don't understand why research is > accepted as credible, when it doesn't take into account other research > related to it. It's like instead of building on one another, they just go > around doing the same experiments. And I can see some value in it when it > confirms someone else's research. But when they don't even seem to be aware > of the research of each other, they are hardly confirming each other's > research. > > And one additional note. The article mentioned the possibility that Prozac > may possibly be somewhat neurotoxic. As PWC's, we already have problems with > neurotoxicity. Why add more potential neurotoxins to our problem? And is it > possible that antidepressants are contributing to our symptoms? The > discussion about PWC's with excess seretonin that's been discussed through > this list gives rise to some concerns I have with using SSRI's above and > beyond the concerns about possible neurotoxic problems. > > I've been on antidepressants, and experienced some very severe side-effects > from them that have soured my opinion of them. The article didn't mention > much about this, and so far as I know, scientists can't come up with an > explanation for those side effects. Playing around with brain chemistry is > like experimenting with street drugs. Until they can come up with a > definitive way to evaluate who will have those side effects, or how those > side effects occur, I think there needs to be a lot more caution about the > use of antidepressants, and I'm alarmed that it is dispensed like candy. I > have the fear that eventually I'm going to be living in a nation full of > brain damaged individuals. And I fear that PWC's that have depended on > antidepressants may find that they have irreparable brain damage when a cure > is finally found for our problem. > > > lindaj@... > > Interesting Serotonin Article > > > In the July issue of Discover Magazine: > > http://www.discover.com/recent_issue/index.html > > > > Click on July 2001. The title of the article is Serotonin Surprise. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 2001 Report Share Posted July 31, 2001 If so much about CFS relates to neurotransmitter imbalances (excesses and/or deficiencies), why don't doctors routinely test PWCs' neurotransmitter levels? Have any of you had your levels tested? What sort of test was it? Blood test? I gather from things I've read on the Web that there are blood and/or urine tests that can gauge neurotransmitter levels. Are these test results considered unreliable? Do the results fluctuate too much in short periods of time? Would the stress of having a blood test cause neurotransmitter fluctuations that would make the test invalid? Thanks for any info or speculations. - E.B. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 2001 Report Share Posted July 31, 2001 Hi and all, I have CFS for more than 12 years. I have used mao inhibitors and various antidepressants during years 1980-1982 as I had a major depression during that time. (I still think from time to time if heavy usage of anti depressants triggered CFS in me). I stoped using them around 1982 1983 and thanks God I did not use them till now. Right now I practice two breathing methods,alpha theta meditation,taoist inner smiling and six healing sounds methods. I use some herbs like valerian, officinialis if I feel a desperate need for them. Breathing and meditation methods helped me tremendously. I believe that playing with brain chemistry is risky and I will continue avoiding them until a drug specific for our illness is found. If anybody is interested in the breathing and or meditation methods that I use please e-mail me separately.I can give you more info on them.I do not want to take time of other people who are not interested in it. Take care of you all. Nil Interesting Serotonin Article > > > > In the July issue of Discover Magazine: > > http://www.discover.com/recent_issue/index.html > > > > Click on July 2001. The title of the article is Serotonin Surprise. > > > > > This list is intended for patients to share personal experiences with each other, not to give medical advice. If you are interested in any treatment discussed here, please consult your doctor. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 1, 2001 Report Share Posted August 1, 2001 > Hi! > > There's a simple solution. Quit taking them. If you've been on them a long time, find a health care practitioner that will help you get off them. There are health care practitioners out there who > refuse to prescribe them. Merle, doctors would probably reply that it is better for someone to *possibly* have brain damage than to be depressed and commit suicide. You have to remember that these people were prescribed Prozac for a reason in the first place. What is your answer for the depression? Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 1, 2001 Report Share Posted August 1, 2001 Hi Tim I hve tried to enter in this web site and it was impossible. Is it possible for you to copy and paste the article and send it.? i am very interested in this subject, since i am on antidepressats since several years (20) and i feel they are making a mess in my brain . thank you v much. Elena (Argentina) Interesting Serotonin Article > In the July issue of Discover Magazine: > http://www.discover.com/recent_issue/index.html > > Click on July 2001. The title of the article is Serotonin Surprise. > > > > This list is intended for patients to share personal experiences with each other, not to give medical advice. If you are interested in any treatment discussed here, please consult your doctor. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 2, 2001 Report Share Posted August 2, 2001 I agree with everything you said. My point is that when most docs spend 15 minutes with a patient, they don't go into all the issues, not to mention that most docs don't know what NAET or EFT is. THe docs actually think they are helping the patient by prescribing an SSRI, because that is what they have been taught. Mike > > What about the people who have an increased risk of suicide BECAUSE they > take antidepressants. There have been studies that have found that > antidepressants actually increase the risk of suicide, not decrease it, > especially within the first few weeks or months of use, because > antidepressants can remove inhibitions and may increase violent behavior. > > There are lots of other alternatives for depression. For starters, EFT (a > form of accupressure treatment similar to NAET.) is very effective at > dealing with emotional issues that can contribute to depression. NAET and > JMT can also be used to deal with depression. There is growing evidence that > severe depression may actually be caused by an infection in many cases, so > much of what applies to CFS and FM may also apply to depression. Allergies > and nutritional malabsorptions can also contribute to depression. > (Especially Omega 3 deficiencies) There are many herbal and nutritional > approaches that can be taken. And psychotherapy is also one approach that > can be taken. And not the least is trying to change the circumstances that > contribute to depression, such as separating from abusive spouses or finding > support from support groups. > > > lindaj@h... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 4, 2001 Report Share Posted August 4, 2001 E.B., It is possible to analyze urine for breakdown products (metabolites) of neurotransmitters. In particular, the metabolite of dopamine is homovanillic acid. That of serotonin is 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA). For norepineprine it's 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol (MHPG). There is a paper by Forsyth et al on NADH in CFS that says they found high 5-HIAA in the urine of PWCs, indicating elevated serotonergic activity. There's also a paper by Demitrack et al in which they found elevated 5-HIAA and low MHPG in the blood, indicating high serotonergic activity and low norepinephrine. The Great Plains Lab organic acid test measures all of them, I think. At least, their website says they measure indicators of three neurotransmitters, and I'm guessing these are the three. I have no reason to doubt the reliability of these tests. The organic acid test is not run by very many labs, and it is not a routinely used test, but I think it is very helpful in sorting out cases of CFS. Rich > If so much about CFS relates to neurotransmitter imbalances (excesses > and/or deficiencies), why don't doctors routinely test PWCs' > neurotransmitter levels? Have any of you had your levels tested? > What sort of test was it? Blood test? > > I gather from things I've read on the Web that there are blood and/or > urine tests that can gauge neurotransmitter levels. Are these test > results considered unreliable? Do the results fluctuate too much in > short periods of time? Would the stress of having a blood test cause > neurotransmitter fluctuations that would make the test invalid? > > Thanks for any info or speculations. > > - E.B. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.