Guest guest Posted November 12, 2003 Report Share Posted November 12, 2003 Dear Forum: I have been reading the back and forth allegations, and denials of the incident surrounding the PLWAs at Sahar airport. After reading through all these I am still confused. It looks like there are two issues involved: a) The fact that they were quarantined inspite of having the waivers. The fact of discrimination and ill tretment. As regards the fact that they were quarantined --from a public health point of view I can see why they were- because due to no fault of their own, they might have been carrying the disease which might have spread to the general population. But they should been told before hand that inspite of having the waivers, they might be quatantined when they would return. But as regards the allegations of ill tretment and discrimination-- it is deplorable. If some people without vaccination got away and could get away scot free and others were not-- that is not right. If they were ill treated-- that was not right either. They shoud have been treated with dignity and respect. The health departments that issued the waivers should have foreseen that people with waivers would be coming back to India without any form of immunity against yellow fever and should have had clear cut guidelines as to what to do about that situation. Then the health department officals should have informed the conference attendees before they left India so that they would have had the choice to attend or not to attend the conference. All these discussions about who visited whom and when would have been redundant. Sathi Dasgupta. E-mail: <sathi_dasgupta@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 13, 2003 Report Share Posted November 13, 2003 Dear Forum, " As regards the fact that they were quarantined --from a public health point of view I can see why they were- because due to no fault of their own, they might have been carrying the disease which might have spread to the general population. But they should been told before hand that inspite of having the waivers, they might be quatantined when they would return " . First, I agree wholeheartedly with the utterly outrageous treatment. It seems to me disingenuous in the extreme to think this bribe-seeking criminal so-called " doctor " (a shame to the profession) was in any way interested in the public health. A grisly blend of greed and bigotry that should be dealt with on the criminal judicial level in my view. I think from the standpoint of public health in it's genuine form, understanding the risks of yellow fever, immunization and clarifying immigration policy is an aspect of the case that has not been properly reviewed. I've been meaning to look into the risks of yellow fever, acquisition, spread, symptoms and other indicators that might suggest whether a risk is actually present and at what level. One excellent article is available at: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/rr/rr5117.pdf and http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvbid/yellowfever/index.htm. Particularly, we should be aware of the potential risk that people unable to Get a vaccine might face should they acquire the disease while suffering immune compromise. A quick review of the literature yielded a couple of abstracts, appended below. Other thoughts on what current Indian law is and any suggestions for changes to it under the circumstances of suppressed immunity/HIV disease would be a good topic of discussion! M. e-MAIL: <fiar@...> *** [Why access to CD4 counting on a routine and inexpensive basis is critically important for ALL people with HIV.] Receveur MC, Thiebaut R, Vedy S, Malvy D, Mercie P, Bras ML. Yellow fever vaccination of human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients: report of 2 cases. Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Sep;31(3):E7-8. Department of Internal Medicine, Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Hospital Saint Andre, Bordeaux, France. marie-catherine. receveur@... Yellow fever vaccine (17D, a live attenuated virus vaccine) was effective and safe in 2 human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients without severe immunosuppression, one of whom traveled to Kenya and the other of whom traveled to Senegal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.