Guest guest Posted July 28, 2003 Report Share Posted July 28, 2003 Sub: Some points for consideration in your discussion Friends, Note prepared on the occasion of the Two day International Conference of South Asian Parliamentarians (SAARC) for " Advocacy Role of Elected Representatives in Prevention of HIV/AIDS " , 1-2 August, 2003, Ashok Hotel, New Delhi (India) The person writing this letter has some experience gained in the prevention activities against the spread of HIV/AIDS in India for the last eight years. Initially the Government and funding agencies came in a big way addressing the issue of HIV through prevention projects. During the course of implementing the top down projects, myself and my organization felt some severe inadequacies starting with its conceptualization, implementation and down to preparing the ground for it. In short, in project lingo, these are lessens learned. # Targeted intervention among " high-risk groups " This is a highly effective intervention strategy. As the modes of transmission are through blood and sexual intercourse to address the high-risk groups (sex workers; injecting drug addicts; mobile work force, such as truck drivers, construction workers etc.) on a war footing before it percolates to the general public seemed effective. But we failed miserably in preparing the ground for intervention. Take for example, the case of sex workers; we never addressed the laws criminalizing sex work and its premises, stigma attached to sex work, human rights violations both by the public and police, gender-power relations in sexuality and differences among the different segments of sex workers. No project can work effectively in a criminalized atmosphere. The projects existed in India as clandestine activity just like contrabands. There never developed a co-ordination between the law making-implementing authorities and the health departments. The projects were drawn in the context of brothels in Europe or US, where there is relative freedom for the inmates in deciding their personal matters. But here the situation was of slave trade and there is no organization of sex workers for collective bargaining either with the brothel owners or with the clients. Without sexworker's organization they can never bargain with clients; if one denies, another should not cater. Except perhaps, in few pockets like Sonagachi in Kolkata, some fifty odd sites in West Bengal, Sangli in Maharashtra, the sex worker's organizations are non-existent in India. Here again, we could see the relative freedom of sex workers running the brothels have decided the matters. But the Governments policy is still against the sex worker's right and organization. Again, the projects drawn in the situation of brothels are used to address the situation of street based sex workers, for example in Kerala, where there is no red-light area or permanent brothel. All the parameters and monitoring systems are for brothels, which makes it ridiculous. (For example, condom tracking, in a brothel situation, a waste basket out side a room can provide some information but in the street, this exercise is the joke of the era, but the project reports will be full of condom tracking) In the absence of brothels, drop-in-centers are a must for executing the projects. But as there was no ground preparation from the part of Government in supporting the drop-in-centers it vanished from the projects in the course of implementation. This means there is no collectivity and hence no bargaining in condom use. Only a nascent organization is there in Kerala. But projects go on in papers. In the absence of collective bargaining the only alternative is using condoms oneself. But the condoms supplied to the female sex workers are male condoms, which mean they have to ask the clients, in harrying conditions, to wear it. The power relations in sexuality are against the women, all they could do is wear something themselves. If the Government promoted female condoms in targeted interventions it would have succeeded immensely. They will cite the prohibitive cost but mass production and subsidy could have brought down the cost. In a study, it is shown that tampons can reduce the rate of infection in women. So the Government should also provide these alternative devices along with male condoms in the projects and ensure their availability in the market. There is still no concept of Male Sex Workers (MSW) but only of Men Seeking Men or Men having Sex with Men (MSM). This stems from the assumption that sex workers are only women; again no one sees it as sexwork but only as exploitation of women, because if you admit the reality of sexwork, then the strategy and policy will have to change. So the authorities just shut their eyes conveniently against the reality. But those who are involved in sex work whether they are male or female know it as work. So we should understand that there is a distinct category of male sex workers, who should be addressed independently. We are not talking of gigolos, a minuscule category, which caters to rich independent women. We should know that we can't address all gay men as sex workers or vice versa. Right now there is enough confusion in these MSM projects. Again, archaic criminalizing laws coined in the name of " unnatural offences " hinder all activities among the male sexworkers as well as within the gay community. There are instances of health activists getting arrested on these charges. The concept of needle exchange among IV drug users is still being debated. With the existing laws, as in the case of sexworkers, no project can be implemented with effectiveness. Change of law is a must in these situations. # Condom promotion The concept of A (Abstinence) B (Be faithful to one partner) C (then use condoms if you can't stick to the other two) in prevention projects ran high. All the IEC (information, education and communication) materials produced by the State Aids Control Societies (SACS) had this moral overtone in it. I must say they created fear and shame in people on the whole. Now it is backfiring. People are rejecting their kith and kin and in the case of strangers they even go to the extent of lynching them. The supposed to be " Indian Culture " and morals are actually fallout of our colonial past. The Indians, for that matter the people of the other SAARC countries also, have a rich tradition in sexuality and a practice so diverse. But, the prudish postures our administrators take make them fit enough to be living in the 19th Century n England. Because of this " right " moral approach, all the people hide their sexuality and pretend otherwise (You could see this in the speech given by Ms. Sushama Swaraj, Minister of Health and Family Welfare, in the recently concluded session of Parliamentary Meet on HIV/AIDS on 26th of July. Referring to the case of P. Kousalya, the President of the Positive Network who spoke on the occasion, she stated that she was a prime example of a person who had been affected through " no fault of hers " .) Yes, sex is a crime!. The existence of several million female sexworkers along with millions of all other varieties in India show that we have a highly promiscuous way of life. We all pretend that we have the barest minimum of sexual life and only the " westerners " are indulging in sex. If it is true, then how come we, Asians have the two thirds of the world population? We should know that we are more active in sex and for that matter, more in 'penetrative' sex and for that matter, more in 'unsafe' sex among all the people in the world. So it is imperative to promote condoms in every way possible and also teach non-penetrative sex. Think about promoting kissing in the movies and tell people to indulge in non-penetrative sex. Make sexuality a pleasurable act, which could be safely practiced instead of keeping it as an act of procreation. Keeping sex as an act of procreation, as religion preaches, is keeping people in the animal state. Because, westerners were able to conceive sex as pleasure in their culture, it remains one of the main reasons that brought the burgeoning population in their countries under control. Here even after thirty years of condom promotion, in the family welfare scenario, it failed to click because of the opposite understanding. For us sex means first procreation and then always penetrative sex. Just think about all the literature like Kamasutra and all the temples of Khajooraho and Konark, what a fall! A real fall from heaven. What we call now western is Indian and what we call Indian is western. When I talk of condoms, we have to think about varieties. We should invent different varieties, especially different colors, which suit the Asians. We can do away with the white variety at all, may be, keep a few for the pale skin people. We must produce immediately flavored condoms and thus promote oral sex, another safe sex activity. As I said earlier we must produce female condoms and tampons to give our women a defense against the penetrative sex culture of the males. This will remain as a viable alternative for the meek and submissive " wives " and " girl friends " . Look at the varieties now available in the market, ribbed condoms, spotted condoms, dotted condoms etc. etc. The idea of friction inside the vagina is behind all this, which the male think is a necessity for women. Poor women have to bear all the thrust and just burn inside. Can't these fellows who design these condoms, just ask the women? Haven't they heard about a protuberance called clitoris in women? Didn't they know about the Grafenberg spot (G-spot) in women's vagina? Ignorance of women's sexuality is the principal input in the designs of men's condoms now. We have to consult women for making male condoms. Similarly consult men for designing female condoms. # Gender If we are not addressing gender-power relations in our culture, we are a doomed people. What we call our culture, is basically an oppressive male culture. Where, in reality, women are bought and sold by men, whether we call it marriage or not. What we call families, are slave houses. The untouchables and stigmatized castes in yesteryears (true, in some parts of the country, even today) felt it " natural " or " fate " and in some cases even felt " proud " of their pitiable existence. This role is played to the maximum by the women now. Talk to the rural (and to most urban) women, they have no idea of self, freedom or equality but only of an animal existence. This animal existence is the back bone of the so-called " Indian Family " . We show the increasing divorces of the west and talk about the " strong " families of the east. But if you look into the cities, where the women have developed some self and knowledge of right, you will see divorces increasing. Everyone will say, " western " influence. Nothing of that sort, it is the identity of the women as a conscious subjects that produces the schism in the family. We will see more of it in the future if democracy percolates into this so called " Indian or Asian families " . As more and more of women break free of their millennia-long dominated trance, they are becoming aware that much that was once viewed as just and natural reality was socially constructed -- and hence, that it can be deconstructed and reconstructed. Of course, the Asian men are wary of it and that is why they are spreading this rumor of our " ancient culture " , which was all cozy, cozy. And they use religion for this end; all talks of religion and culture boil down in the end to the curtailing and controlling women and their sexuality. Women as a section, in all the classes, remain the most exploited. A Dalit woman has to bear the oppression of class and caste as well as of gender and race. We should know that it is men who take initiative in sexual matters and for that matter, we should address them in all corners, in all walks of life. We should teach them, first to respect women; I mean their wives and sisters, not some eulogized Deities or " Devies " . Teach them not to see them as " fields " to be sowed with their seeds, but as partners in their life, as another human being. Teach them to ask their permission first before they make sexual advances. Teach them to talk to their partners about sexual matters. Teach them not to use violence, physical or mental, upon their partners if they refuse coitus. Above all teach them to love them instead of inflicting conjugal rape. Then, teach them that penetrative sex is not a must for sexual pleasure and for women it is the least desirable. Make them understand the sexuality of women and if not for procreation, make them avoid, at all costs, penetrative sex. Break the inflated balloon of " masculinity " ; teach them to be just another human being. Tell them they don't have to carry all the weight of masculinity of eons and prove their virility by raping their partner. Teach them the so-called feminine values of care and love. Teach men to daily attend the women and children, not just be the bread winner. A man caring for the children and women won't be that violent. You may ask what all this means in the field of HIV/AIDS prevention, I will say everything. If we can address men as a section and device projects for them specifically, we will achieve the impossible. Right now, all the health programs are targeting women because it is easy to avail them. Unless and until the women recognize their status as equal to men, it is useless to spend billions on them. It is the men, who decide. Take for example, in the family planning scenario, when first male condoms where the only the option available, men used it more. Then vasectomy came and men queued to get operated upon. But once tubectomy came into vogue, men shed all their responsibility of using condoms and undergoing vasectomy. So we have to educate men on their responsibility in sexual matters, which will bring a sea change. # Sex education in Schools " Experience of AIDS control in other countries has shown that education is crucial to the success of the struggle against this epidemic. Only education can empower young people with the knowledge they need to protect themselves and their communities. Only education can combat the problem of stigma and discrimination " . Mr. Atal Bihari Vajpayee, as quoted in SAATHI, newsletter in the recently concluded session of Parliamentary Meet on HIV/AIDS on 26th of July. See the conscious avoidance of the word Sex before the word education. Don't you think Mr. Vajpayee is referring to sex education in this context? But that is how clever our administrators are, talk big and leave the necessary. Any thing reminiscent of sexuality is looked down upon, so sex education in schools and colleges remained a far-fetched dream. Increased segregation of girls and boys and the pregnant silence on sexuality produced hypocritical and ignorant as well as violent " citizens " and administrators/rulers. Right now our schools are acting as factories churning out violent men and submissive women. The main duty, other than teaching, of the teachers is to play police in monitoring the pupils. Their sadistic interests are in catching young students writing love letters, talking to each other and even glancing to the girl's side. Even from the first standard, children are separated and made " boys " and " girls " . If pregnancy is the problem they are trying to avoid, the teachers should know the basics that children before the age of puberty are not capable of making others pregnant. This unhealthy situation in schools brings out violent young men, who have no knowledge of sexuality and of tenderness. These half baked human beings are then forced to tie the nuptial knot. And what can you expect in this " married " life? When literacy increases, which mean even the last of them, are going through the mill of school, violence will also increase in proportion. We should make all the students of young age till the 10th standard, sit together and know each other. We should abolish all girl's and boy's school at the earliest, make co-education a reality. Then, introduce sex education in schools. This will bring down, unnecessary pregnancies, illegal abortions, rape and violence in married life as well as in the society at large. This alone will help to have healthy sexual life, which naturally will prevent the spread of AIDS. # Treatment and Care of PLWHAs This has been already pointed out by many people who are involved in this field. Right now we test people, know their status and leave them on the road. The only contribution of the testing is increasing stigmatization of HIV+ people. Catching a disease in the words of Ms Sushama Swaraj " is their fault " , a crime. Any test in Medical field is to recognize about the state of disease and for treatment. But when it comes to AIDS, for the Government, it is only to know and make people either commit suicide or get lynched. NACO in its policy says because of its prohibitive cost the Government is not considering treatment. Hope this could be said of the " knees " or " eyes " of ministers. After forgetting about the inhumanness of this statement, I must say this is faulty logic, people falling ill for considerably long period and filling up beds and wards of hospitals will incur more expenditure than healthy people walking around. We must remember that it is people of the productive age that are being wasted by this policy. Urgent intervention is necessary for correcting this attitude and introduce the available treatment as soon as possible. In India we have companies producing the cheapest of medicines in the world. Look at Ms Kousalya, who represented the HIV+ person in the above said meeting, bubbling with enthusiasm and energy. We are losing hundreds, daily, like her because of our neglect. VCT Centers are established by the Government for counseling and testing but there are umpteenth number of private labs that have mushroomed all over the country with no facility for counseling. None of the labs do three testing, which is mandatory. They, with impunity and insensitivity, tell the patient or relative about their status and create much trauma for everyone. Even with three tests ELISA has prohibitive false results, and then think about one test. Immediate intervention with necessary laws in this field is a necessity of the hour. # The formation of SACS Before concluding, a few words on the AIDS Control Societies formed in the country. Though I am not sure of the rest of the country, the one formed here, in Kerala, where I reside, is no society but an inefficient extension of the health department. AIDS Cells, the forerunners of AIDS Control Societies, were dismantled for efficiency and given relative autonomy. Probably this has been implemented on the insistence of the Foreign Funding Agencies. But, it is the same old soup in a new name. The SACS remain a society in name. It is the same old staff, with the same old attitude, inefficient, spiritless, spineless and useless. All they did was create fear in the minds of people, increase stigma against the positive people through their " moralistic " awareness campaign. ( " Avoid sex with strangers " , one caption goes. Think about a country where arranged marriages take place and people marry only strangers. No dating, nothing. Again, if you make friendship and buy a coffee and then have sex, no fear of infection! The stranger is a friend now, no friends will infect... All this happens because they want to be moralistic.) We have to be innovative and bold to face such a situation. But that is exactly missing in these societies. There are now international covenants that stipulate the formation of institutions with autonomy on human rights, women's welfare and social justice. So the Government goes on making the Human Rights Commission, Women's Commission, etc. etc., but all are toothless, wasteful and are only making a lot of noise, creating an impression that something is being done. Adding to these now, we have the SACS, but we should know that we can't get away this time. AIDS is not like Human Rights, it will get you even if funding agencies don't. So I plead to you all: let us be serious in our efforts in addressing this deluge of a disease. Let us not try to delude ourselves. Maitreya Foundation for Integrated Research in Mental Health (FIRM) PTPN-E30, PTP Nagar PO Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India-695038 Tel: +91 471 2598186®, 2368142, 2300334 Emai:maitreya@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.