Education of the children of the positive people in Kerala

[Guest guest]

Forum,

Education of the children of the positive people is becoming a problem in Kerala

society. This is irrespective of their HIV status. Five such incidents came to

our notice within the last one week. The parents are also experiencing ostracism

from the society. In two cases, the children are not allowed to continue in the

school where there have been studying, though they are negative. In both places

the decision came from people’s committees. This once again proves that Kerala’s

high education status has only an instrumental basis which is of technical

quality that helps to attain jobs. There is no real quality or value so that the

system rejects those who are not fit to its instrumentality. At the same time

there are concerned citizens who try to change the attitude of society.

Dr. Gangadharan, a social leader from Parappanangadi wrote to us. “The

significance of this case is that even `HIV negative' child of one with `AIDS'

suffer due to social ostracism. This can be used by the `control society' for

anti-aids activities. But at the same time they should do something for this

girl to get admission in a school. We have written to the Director of Kerala

State AIDS Control Society. I am reporting the matter to District Collector

Muraleedharan with a request to help the girl. But he may say that nothing

further could be done at his level because he had ordered all officers like

D.E.O., A.E.O., Tehsildar, etc. to be present at the parent-teacher meeting

yesterday to plead for admission of the girl. But the officers were overruled by

the majority of the `enlightened' parents and teachers!”

In another case as reported by Mathrubhoomi daily the widow of a positive person

is asked to change their residence and the children are not allowed continuing

schools including Angan wadi. In a third incidence the positive parents were

ostracized from the community for fear of spreading the disease through insect

larvae. This led to the suicide of the couple leaving the child with nobody to

care. Two other children are facing discrimination in the orphanage and they

require education and care.

We have seen that in some countries HIV infection opened the space for openness

in sexuality matters and asserting the rights of vulnerable people like gays,

sex workers, IV drug users etc. Only such countries could control HIV/AIDS

effectively and remove stigma from society. In Kerala also we had hope

initially. The training programmes were envisaged in such a way that the myths

and false moral values were deconstructed. This may be because it was initiated

by foreign donor agencies that had international experiences. But when it has

grown to a National programme it gradually got absorbed into the system. Now the

prudish attitude of Indian society is reflected in all HIV related discourses

and trainings. ‘No premarital sex or extra marital sex’, ‘Be faithful to your

partner’ ‘Use condom only if former is not possible’. These ideas are advocated

by those who are officially responsible for HIV prevention. May be they are

naïve. But if there is somebody who is responsible, they

should take care of this. It is the same values which give the “moral spirit”

for those who ostracize positive people.

We have to look seriously into the haphazardous manner in which AIDS control

programmes are carried out. All of us who work among the vulnerable groups have

repeatedly talked about the need for removal of stigma related to sexuality and

protection of rights of the vulnerable groups. It is not easy. But those who

are in this field should take care at least not to propagate judgmental values

and prescriptive norms. Both the government agencies and NGOs should train their

staff members in such a manner that they would be able to take a nonjudgemental

position in front of common people even if they themselves have different value

orientation. Even doctors are not properly trained in Kerala. Some of them do

not keep confidedntiality, give vague answers like HIV can be transmitted

through mosquites, and be faithful to your partner and so on. Those who take

leadership in HIV prevention activities have got the responsibility to provide

value neutral or use values to support the vulnerable. If those who cannot do it

voluntarily must turn away from this field, it will be of great help. The

confusions can be avoided. The fear, confusion and overreaction from the public

can be removed only if they are led by committed leaders.

What happened to the initial projects? Before the programmes got

institutionalized and systematized what ever minimum initiatives came from

committed individuals and communities. Even when funded programmes came, there

was dialogue with vulnerable people. As the programmes got systematized, all

decisions come from above. This is a period when NGOs are also getting

transformed into Government institutions by ‘capacity building’ and

standardization which take away the spirit of spontaneity they previously had.

The community based organizations are side lined by NGOs which do not have much

difference from government organizations. Most of the programmes are determined

by donor agencies. Funded organizations have to fear the evaluation by the

‘programmed’ ‘experts’. They are forced to postpone their responses to public

issues for their commitment to report to the authorities. So, those who are

supposed to be with vulnerable people stand for the powerful. The Governments in

devel

oping countries just follow U. S. decisions. Every body knows that U. S is

taking anti-sexuality minority, anti-women, anti-poor stand that influence the

authorities of the poor countries. How to resist this is our challenge, when our

government, donor agencies, experts, NGOs and even politicians waver in their

standpoints? Who will correct the ignorant people and resist overreaction from

public?

Dr.Jayasree A.K.

FIRM, KERALA

E-mail: jayasree@...