Guest guest Posted December 5, 2002 Report Share Posted December 5, 2002 , I think that fruits and vegetables are good sources of several of the essential minerals. However, there are some minerals that may not be present in a fruit and vegetable diet at high enough concentrations to supply close to the optimum amounts that people need. For example, calcium, zinc and iron are often not high enough in diets of this type. In addition, chromium, selenium and iodine are not needed by plants, but they are needed by human beings. Plants may contain them, if they grow on soil that contains them, but the plants will grow perfectly well without them, so you can't count on them being there just because the plants grew well. These are the reasons why I think that taking a multimineral or a high potency general nutritional supplement that contains appropriate amounts of the minerals known to be needed by the body is a good idea. Of course, we can debate about the appropriate amounts, but I think everyone who looks at the evidence rationally will agree that we do need some of each of several of the minerals. (I personally don't think that fluoride is an essential mineral, even though it is used to prevent tooth decay. I notice that the younger kids now tend to have fluorosis spots on their front teeth from too much fluoride. I don't view this as a beneficial development, and I wonder what the long-term effects on their skeletons will be.) I have no objection to taking the products you mentioned, , so long as a person doesn't overdo them, and so long as one gets enough of the minerals that aren't in them in large enough quantities. In regard to lithium, 1.2 mg per day is probably not going to do much to a person. Perhaps amounts this low actually do some good. My concern is that one not overdo lithium, because its therapeutic range when used as a drug is narrow. It doesn't take much more than the effective dose to get into the toxic range, and this has resulted in quite a few deaths of people who have been treated for bipolar disorder using lithium. Rich > Rich, you analyzed a couple brands now of the liquid ionic and bioactive > minerals and I remember you stressing one reason you did not favor them was > that they had lithium in them. I am looking at the back of my NOW Ionic > Trace Minerals label and it says that it has 1.2 mg of lithium in the > recommended dosage they are recommending. Now, I go to this paragraph from > Vitamin Research page that was posted previously on this discussion here: > > Superiority of Lithium Orotate > > The lithium salt of orotic acid (lithium orotate) improves the specific > effects of lithium many-fold by increasing lithium bio- utilization. The > orotates transport the lithium to the membranes of mitochondria, lysosomes > and the glia cells. Lithium orotate stabilizes the lysosomal membranes and > prevents the enzyme reactions that are responsible for the sodium depletion > and dehydration effects of other lithium salts. Because of the superior > bioavailability of lithium orotate, the therapeutic dosage is much less than > prescription forms of lithium. For example, in cases of severe depression, > the therapeutic dosage of lithium orotate is 150 mg/day. This is compared to > 900-1800 mg of the prescription forms. In this dosage range of lithium > orotate, there are no adverse lithium side reactions and no need for > monitoring blood serum measurements.17 > > Now, what I am wondering is if prescription gets up to 900-1800 mg then why > do you become worrisome over 1.2 mg of naturally occuring lithium? > Also, your argument was that humans are designed to get their minerals from > foods and not from sea water from the Great Salt Lakes of Utah. But then > again, humans definitely are not designed to take minerals in the forms that > we are otherwised offered w/o getting them from naturally occuring foods. So > out of the two choices I don't see why the best choice would be to consume a > lot of fruits and vegetables (like I am doing with the blender mix I drink > every morning) and then supplement with one of the two supplements mentioned > here recently as at least the ionic trace minerals are from a naturally > occuring source (even if we didn't evolve drinking this sea water, much like > we didn't evolve doing 7 bee stings MWF like I am still doing) and are > absorbed better and is highly bioavailable, allowing the body to selectively > utilize what it needs, rather than forcing all the minerals in whether you > need them or not and nocking other minerals out of balance in the process. > Thanks for the analysis of the products but as you can probably see, I'm sold > now. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 5, 2002 Report Share Posted December 5, 2002 Rich- What does a flourosis spot lool like? Do you know if it is white? Kathy Re: Ionic/Bioactive minerals , I think that fruits and vegetables are good sources of several of the essential minerals. However, there are some minerals that may not be present in a fruit and vegetable diet at high enough concentrations to supply close to the optimum amounts that people need. For example, calcium, zinc and iron are often not high enough in diets of this type. In addition, chromium, selenium and iodine are not needed by plants, but they are needed by human beings. Plants may contain them, if they grow on soil that contains them, but the plants will grow perfectly well without them, so you can't count on them being there just because the plants grew well. These are the reasons why I think that taking a multimineral or a high potency general nutritional supplement that contains appropriate amounts of the minerals known to be needed by the body is a good idea. Of course, we can debate about the appropriate amounts, but I think everyone who looks at the evidence rationally will agree that we do need some of each of several of the minerals. (I personally don't think that fluoride is an essential mineral, even though it is used to prevent tooth decay. I notice that the younger kids now tend to have fluorosis spots on their front teeth from too much fluoride. I don't view this as a beneficial development, and I wonder what the long-term effects on their skeletons will be.) I have no objection to taking the products you mentioned, , so long as a person doesn't overdo them, and so long as one gets enough of the minerals that aren't in them in large enough quantities. In regard to lithium, 1.2 mg per day is probably not going to do much to a person. Perhaps amounts this low actually do some good. My concern is that one not overdo lithium, because its therapeutic range when used as a drug is narrow. It doesn't take much more than the effective dose to get into the toxic range, and this has resulted in quite a few deaths of people who have been treated for bipolar disorder using lithium. Rich > Rich, you analyzed a couple brands now of the liquid ionic and bioactive > minerals and I remember you stressing one reason you did not favor them was > that they had lithium in them. I am looking at the back of my NOW Ionic > Trace Minerals label and it says that it has 1.2 mg of lithium in the > recommended dosage they are recommending. Now, I go to this paragraph from > Vitamin Research page that was posted previously on this discussion here: > > Superiority of Lithium Orotate > > The lithium salt of orotic acid (lithium orotate) improves the specific > effects of lithium many-fold by increasing lithium bio- utilization. The > orotates transport the lithium to the membranes of mitochondria, lysosomes > and the glia cells. Lithium orotate stabilizes the lysosomal membranes and > prevents the enzyme reactions that are responsible for the sodium depletion > and dehydration effects of other lithium salts. Because of the superior > bioavailability of lithium orotate, the therapeutic dosage is much less than > prescription forms of lithium. For example, in cases of severe depression, > the therapeutic dosage of lithium orotate is 150 mg/day. This is compared to > 900-1800 mg of the prescription forms. In this dosage range of lithium > orotate, there are no adverse lithium side reactions and no need for > monitoring blood serum measurements.17 > > Now, what I am wondering is if prescription gets up to 900-1800 mg then why > do you become worrisome over 1.2 mg of naturally occuring lithium? > Also, your argument was that humans are designed to get their minerals from > foods and not from sea water from the Great Salt Lakes of Utah. But then > again, humans definitely are not designed to take minerals in the forms that > we are otherwised offered w/o getting them from naturally occuring foods. So > out of the two choices I don't see why the best choice would be to consume a > lot of fruits and vegetables (like I am doing with the blender mix I drink > every morning) and then supplement with one of the two supplements mentioned > here recently as at least the ionic trace minerals are from a naturally > occuring source (even if we didn't evolve drinking this sea water, much like > we didn't evolve doing 7 bee stings MWF like I am still doing) and are > absorbed better and is highly bioavailable, allowing the body to selectively > utilize what it needs, rather than forcing all the minerals in whether you > need them or not and nocking other minerals out of balance in the process. > Thanks for the analysis of the products but as you can probably see, I'm sold > now. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 6, 2002 Report Share Posted December 6, 2002 Kathy, Fluorosis spots on teeth look whiter than the normal tooth enamel. They form due to high fluorosis before the tooth has emerged from the gum. I think there is a whole generation of kids who have them now. My grandson is one of them. Rich > > Rich, you analyzed a couple brands now of the liquid ionic and > bioactive > > minerals and I remember you stressing one reason you did not favor > them was > > that they had lithium in them. I am looking at the back of my NOW > Ionic > > Trace Minerals label and it says that it has 1.2 mg of lithium in > the > > recommended dosage they are recommending. Now, I go to this > paragraph from > > Vitamin Research page that was posted previously on this > discussion here: > > > > Superiority of Lithium Orotate > > > > The lithium salt of orotic acid (lithium orotate) improves the > specific > > effects of lithium many-fold by increasing lithium bio- > utilization. The > > orotates transport the lithium to the membranes of mitochondria, > lysosomes > > and the glia cells. Lithium orotate stabilizes the lysosomal > membranes and > > prevents the enzyme reactions that are responsible for the sodium > depletion > > and dehydration effects of other lithium salts. Because of the > superior > > bioavailability of lithium orotate, the therapeutic dosage is much > less than > > prescription forms of lithium. For example, in cases of severe > depression, > > the therapeutic dosage of lithium orotate is 150 mg/day. This is > compared to > > 900-1800 mg of the prescription forms. In this dosage range of > lithium > > orotate, there are no adverse lithium side reactions and no need > for > > monitoring blood serum measurements.17 > > > > Now, what I am wondering is if prescription gets up to 900- 1800 mg > then why > > do you become worrisome over 1.2 mg of naturally occuring lithium? > > Also, your argument was that humans are designed to get their > minerals from > > foods and not from sea water from the Great Salt Lakes of Utah. > But then > > again, humans definitely are not designed to take minerals in the > forms that > > we are otherwised offered w/o getting them from naturally occuring > foods. So > > out of the two choices I don't see why the best choice would be to > consume a > > lot of fruits and vegetables (like I am doing with the blender mix > I drink > > every morning) and then supplement with one of the two supplements > mentioned > > here recently as at least the ionic trace minerals are from a > naturally > > occuring source (even if we didn't evolve drinking this sea water, > much like > > we didn't evolve doing 7 bee stings MWF like I am still doing) and > are > > absorbed better and is highly bioavailable, allowing the body to > selectively > > utilize what it needs, rather than forcing all the minerals in > whether you > > need them or not and nocking other minerals out of balance in the > process. > > Thanks for the analysis of the products but as you can probably > see, I'm sold > > now. > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.