Guest guest Posted April 15, 2003 Report Share Posted April 15, 2003 The LA paper wrote: " s now says she's confident she never had the stealth virus. But what did she have? s says it was lyme disease, but for years she went without antibiotics because she was convinced she had the stealth virus. After all, she says, told her blood tests confirmed it. " This waman may have only herself to blame since 's own treatment approach to his " stealth virus " was longterm antibiotics, in particular, he favored Biaxin. This woman has already lost one lawsuit. Hopefully she will lose another. I never felt the stealth virus thing was valid and I knew . But I do think he was doing what he believed to be honest research. I think he is being maligned. Also, as you consider this please, remember that nothing the CDC says has any significance as they have never tested cfs cases for anything much at all, (remember Bell's lymph node biopsies still sitting in refrigerators in Atlanta?) nor do they recognize any valid Lyme tests. Geez, how can this woman win her case claiming she now has Lyme disease. I mean it is undiagnosable. She might as well stick with STEALTH VIRUS. a Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.