Guest guest Posted April 13, 2004 Report Share Posted April 13, 2004 India's free antiretroviral programme gets off to slow start India's HIV/AIDS programme has entered a new phase with the launch of free antiretroviral treatment in government clinics from April 1, 2004. But the programme is a diluted version of one that was announced by health minister Sushma Swaraj on World AIDS Day last year. Just one government hospital in each of six high-prevalence states will be able to distribute the drugs. But in Delhi--a low-prevalence state and a surprise inclusion on the list--free drugs will be available at two hospitals. Priority will be given to women already registered in the " prevention of parent-to-child programme " in government antenatal clinics, children younger than 15, and patients with full-blown AIDS who are already being treated at the eight selected hospitals, according to the National AIDS Control Organisation. Public health experts criticised the plan last year saying that the government delivery system was not prepared for it. Swaraj initiated talks with Indian generic antiretroviral manufacturers to reduce the costs of the drugs below prices agreed by the Clinton Foundation. But the discussions collapsed because early general elections prevented budgetary negotiations from being finalised. As a result, the future sustainability of the free drug supplies remains uncertain. " We should have done proper homework before launching such a programme " , comments Radium Bhattacharya, a spokesperson for the Indian Network of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) on HIV/AIDS. " For enrolment of patients, referral, and follow-up, each state should have a nodal network of NGOs. This has been done only in Tamil Nadu state. " Bhattacharya believes that without such an arrangement, patient recruitment will be poor. In the first week, the programme has enrolled just 10 patients in Manipur and 25 in Andhra Pradesh--both of which are high-prevalence states. The aim is to provide treatment to 100 000 people in the first year. Dinesh C Sharma The Lancet. Volume 363, Number 9416.10 April 2004 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.