Guest guest Posted March 7, 2006 Report Share Posted March 7, 2006 Information is good. Let's make up our own minds about what is being injected into our children ---------------------------------------------- Risk From Vitamin K Injections? LONDON (Reuters) -- Four papers in the current British Medical Journal examine the possible association between the risk of childhood leukaemia and the administration of intramuscular vitamin K to babies, but the results, taken together, are inconclusive. The UK papers were prompted by research in the early 1990s, in which Dr. Jean Golding of the University of Bristol reported a possible doubling of the risk of childhood cancers following the administration of vitamin K injections to newborns. Newborn babies tend to have low levels of vitamin K, which aids blood clotting. An injection of the vitamin is commonly given to babies to reduce risk of internal bleeding. Dr. A. McKinney and colleagues from the Agency for the National Health Service in Edinburgh could not confirm an association between childhood cancers, including acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, and vitamin K injections to newborns. Their population-based, case-control study is based on data taken from hospital records of more than 1,000 ish children up to the age of 14 years. However, in a retrospective case-control study of more than 3,000 English children under the age of 15, Dr. Louise and colleagues from the University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, found " a raised odds ratio " for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia among 1 to 6 year olds who have received vitamin K injections. The authors say their study suggests " ...that there could be a significant increase in this form of leukaemia in early childhood among babies given intramuscular prophylaxis at birth. " and colleagues caution that there still is no evidence that a 1 milligram injection of vitamin K is carcinogenic. But the raised odds ratio for the subgroup of 1 to 6 year olds suggests that consideration should be given to use of oral, rather than intramuscular, vitamin K. " If it could be shown that oral administration is as effective as intramuscular prophylaxis in abolishing the risk of late vitamin K deficiency bleeding, many clinicians would now choose oral prophylaxis, " they conclude. In the other two papers, Dr. S. Jane Passmore and colleagues from the Childhood Cancer Research Group in Oxford, UK, say they cannot exclude a risk of childhood cancers, but conclude, based on their data, that the risk cannot be large. Analysing data from a case-control and an ecological study in the UK, Passmore and colleagues write that the " ... lack of consistency between the various studies so far published, including this one, and the low relative risks found in most of them suggest that the risk, if any, attributable to the use of vitamin K cannot be large, but the possibility that there is some risk cannot be excluded. " The Golding study and subsequent research has prompted the Department of Health to commission a meta-analysis on the subject, McKinney told Reuters. She said the meta-analysis should be completed by early 1999. SOURCE: British Medical Journal (1998;316:173-192) -- " Health Comes From Within " http://users.comten.com/paulkoch/home.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.