Re: Re: Use Viable Along with Non-Viable Sampling Methods

[Guest guest]

,

That's right, " dust. " Remediating to remove detectable mold is

insufficient because of the " dust " exposure. Some in the industry are

considering a cleanliness standard based on " dust " instead of just

mold. That sounds great until you realize they want to clean to a

specific level of " dust " totally divorced from and without regard for

health concerns. Which would obviously make it worse for us.

ANY test or standard applied to victims must be calibrated to the

specific victim or the suffering will continue.

Carl Grimes

Healthy Habitats LLC

-----

> I see they are making SOME progress, but still lack a practical

> understanding relevant to real needs.

> As I've said before, the unidentifiable detritus of conidia STILL

> retain sufficient toxins to kick your butt. That's right!: " Dust " .

> -

>

>

>

>

>

>