Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Use Viable Along with Non-Viable Sampling Methods

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

I see they are making SOME progress, but still lack a practical

understanding relevant to real needs.

As I've said before, the unidentifiable detritus of conidia STILL

retain sufficient toxins to kick your butt.

That's right!: " Dust " .

-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> ANY test or standard applied to victims must be calibrated to the

> specific victim or the suffering will continue.

Yes. We have truly entered a new era in which old " standards " can not

possibly apply.

You may remember my old postings on this subject in which I ask how

any new standards can be developed when no two peoples sensitivities

are the same. Even sensitivities in the individual vary, so any

standard developed will not apply for long.

Going to be interesting times ahead.

-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...