Guest guest Posted May 19, 2005 Report Share Posted May 19, 2005 This was the doctor involved in the Cincinnati mold case/s: http://www.netwellness.org/healthtopics/allergies/molds.cfm I. Bernstein, M.D. OR Leonard =I don't know which Professor of Medicine Division of Immunology and Allergy Department of Internal Medicine College of Medicine University of Cincinnati Apparently it's all in the family here, as there is apparently a brother and son or nephew also it appears on same page in same field. Oh and I see and remember why I knew he couldn't help me as his most recent article seems to say the opposite of what we know is true here: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/01/27/health/webmd/main669795.shtml called " Toxic Mold Madness " It's amazing how these experts get totally turned around. It makes you wonder if they have been bullied a little?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2005 Report Share Posted May 19, 2005 It's Bernstein that is the third " Learned Immunologist " from the University of Cincinnati. He has been called to testify for the defense against sick teachers in the Dayton, Ohio area. _.Bernstein@..._ (mailto:.Bernstein@...) Here is a follow up article that WebMD was gracious enough to run after that horrid prior little piece you cited. Sharon But Many Cases of Mold-Linked Illness Not Allergy By _ DeNoon_ (http://my.webmd.com/content/Biography/7/1756_53105.htm) WebMD Medical News Reviewed By _Brunilda Nazario, MD_ (http://my.webmd.com/content/Biography/7/40428.htm) on Thursday, February 24, 2005 (http://adv.webmd.com/event.ng/Type=click & FlightID=48700 & AdID=111740 & TargetID=21\ 411 & Values=31,43,60,77,84,100,110,150,197,202,1653,3374,4527,11523,11566,11 603,11658,11666,17286,17907,18994,23977,29622,32545,43448,44274,44509,46332,46 336,47830,48102 & Redirect=http://www.cornerstonebiopharma.com/AlleRx/default.ht m) Feb. 24, 2005 -- Mold allergies -- not mold poisoning -- cause most cases of " toxic mold syndrome_toxic mold syndrome_ (http://my.webmd.com/content/article/99/105412.htm) , " new study explains. But the study also shows that many cases of mold-linked illness can't be explained by allergic reactions. The report, by allergists A. Edmondson, DO, Jordan N. Fink, MD, and colleagues at Medical College of Wisconsin, appears in the February issue of ls of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. The researchers examined 36 children and 29 adults thought to have toxic mold syndrome. About half turned out to be allergic to molds. " Our patients assumed that they were experiencing toxic mold syndrome when, in fact, most were experiencing [allergic] reactions to various antigens in their environment, " Edmondson and colleagues write. That still left a sizeable number of patients whose illness could not be explained by allergy. " Twenty-five percent of the patients had symptoms not compatible with [allergy], " Edmondson and colleagues write. " [Mold]-mediated mechanisms may account for these symptoms. …The [cause] of these symptoms … remains unclear and warrants further investigation. " Toxic Mold Syndrome Remains Controversial The patients, ranging in age from 1.5 to 52, had all kinds of symptoms. Most had a runny nose and a cough. Others had headaches, breathing problems (including shortness of breath, wheezing, and chest tightness), itchy eyes, and nervous system problems (including dizziness, anxiety, weakness, restless legs, memory loss, and shaking), intestinal problems (including nausea, vomiting, and gut pain), nosebleed, and urinary problems. Accompanying the study is an editorial by mold expert W. Elliott Horner, PhD, of Air Quality Sciences, Inc., in Atlanta. Horner notes that toxic mold syndrome is extremely controversial. However, he also points to a recent report by the prestigious Institute of Medicine that strongly supports the idea that damp, moldy buildings can harm people's health. " Perhaps part of the controversy regarding the health effects of indoor mold could be [done away with] if the ill-defined phrase toxic mold syndrome> were replaced by damp building effect, which refers to a well-documented effect but avoids any claim of [cause], " Horner writes. Horner points out there is currently no accurate way to measure mold toxins in damp buildings. Without such a tool, it is impossible to test whether toxic mold is, in fact, causing illness. Until scientists develop such tests, he says, people should stop arguing and start collecting more data. In the meantime, he urges both doctors and patients to keep an open mind about the possible toxic effects of molds. " Although certainly not proven, the suspect with the most fingerprints at the scene seems to be mold components shed from fungal colonized construction and finishing materials and furnishings, " he writes. " It is time now for data rather than diatribe. " ____________________________________ SOURCES: Edmondson, D.A. ls of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, February 2005; vol 94: pp 234-239. Horner, W.E. ls of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, February 2005; vol 94: pp 213-215. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2005 Report Share Posted May 19, 2005 One more for the Quack folder!!!!If it walks like a duck and.....well you know the rest. --- In , " barb1283 " <barb1283@y...> wrote: > This was the doctor involved in the Cincinnati mold case/s: > > http://www.netwellness.org/healthtopics/allergies/molds.cfm > > I. Bernstein, M.D. OR Leonard =I don't know which > Professor of Medicine > Division of Immunology and Allergy > Department of Internal Medicine > College of Medicine > University of Cincinnati > > Apparently it's all in the family here, as there is apparently a > brother and son or nephew also it appears on same page in same field. > > Oh and I see and remember why I knew he couldn't help me as his most > recent article seems to say the opposite of what we know is true here: > > > http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/01/27/health/webmd/main669795.sht ml > > called " Toxic Mold Madness " > > It's amazing how these experts get totally turned around. It makes > you wonder if they have been bullied a little?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2005 Report Share Posted May 19, 2005 SHARON, DO YOU MEAN THAT JONATHAN BERNSTEIN IS FOR THE DEFENSE OF THE PEOPLE WHO MADE THOSE TEACHERS SICK? HOW DID YOU FIND THIS OUT? THANKS MUCH! VICTORIA Re: [] Cincinnati mold incident It's Bernstein that is the third " Learned Immunologist " from the University of Cincinnati. He has been called to testify for the defense against sick teachers in the Dayton, Ohio area. _.Bernstein@..._ (mailto:.Bernstein@...) Here is a follow up article that WebMD was gracious enough to run after that horrid prior little piece you cited. Sharon But Many Cases of Mold-Linked Illness Not Allergy By _ DeNoon_ (http://my.webmd.com/content/Biography/7/1756_53105.htm) WebMD Medical News Reviewed By _Brunilda Nazario, MD_ (http://my.webmd.com/content/Biography/7/40428.htm) on Thursday, February 24, 2005 (http://adv.webmd.com/event.ng/Type=click & FlightID=48700 & AdID=111740 & TargetID=21\ 411 & Values=31,43,60,77,84,100,110,150,197,202,1653,3374,4527,11523,11566,11 603,11658,11666,17286,17907,18994,23977,29622,32545,43448,44274,44509,46332,46 336,47830,48102 & Redirect=http://www.cornerstonebiopharma.com/AlleRx/default.ht m) Feb. 24, 2005 -- Mold allergies -- not mold poisoning -- cause most cases of " toxic mold syndrome_toxic mold syndrome_ (http://my.webmd.com/content/article/99/105412.htm) , " new study explains. But the study also shows that many cases of mold-linked illness can't be explained by allergic reactions. The report, by allergists A. Edmondson, DO, Jordan N. Fink, MD, and colleagues at Medical College of Wisconsin, appears in the February issue of ls of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. The researchers examined 36 children and 29 adults thought to have toxic mold syndrome. About half turned out to be allergic to molds. " Our patients assumed that they were experiencing toxic mold syndrome when, in fact, most were experiencing [allergic] reactions to various antigens in their environment, " Edmondson and colleagues write. That still left a sizeable number of patients whose illness could not be explained by allergy. " Twenty-five percent of the patients had symptoms not compatible with [allergy], " Edmondson and colleagues write. " [Mold]-mediated mechanisms may account for these symptoms. …The [cause] of these symptoms … remains unclear and warrants further investigation. " Toxic Mold Syndrome Remains Controversial The patients, ranging in age from 1.5 to 52, had all kinds of symptoms. Most had a runny nose and a cough. Others had headaches, breathing problems (including shortness of breath, wheezing, and chest tightness), itchy eyes, and nervous system problems (including dizziness, anxiety, weakness, restless legs, memory loss, and shaking), intestinal problems (including nausea, vomiting, and gut pain), nosebleed, and urinary problems. Accompanying the study is an editorial by mold expert W. Elliott Horner, PhD, of Air Quality Sciences, Inc., in Atlanta. Horner notes that toxic mold syndrome is extremely controversial. However, he also points to a recent report by the prestigious Institute of Medicine that strongly supports the idea that damp, moldy buildings can harm people's health. " Perhaps part of the controversy regarding the health effects of indoor mold could be [done away with] if the ill-defined phrase toxic mold syndrome> were replaced by damp building effect, which refers to a well-documented effect but avoids any claim of [cause], " Horner writes. Horner points out there is currently no accurate way to measure mold toxins in damp buildings. Without such a tool, it is impossible to test whether toxic mold is, in fact, causing illness. Until scientists develop such tests, he says, people should stop arguing and start collecting more data. In the meantime, he urges both doctors and patients to keep an open mind about the possible toxic effects of molds. " Although certainly not proven, the suspect with the most fingerprints at the scene seems to be mold components shed from fungal colonized construction and finishing materials and furnishings, " he writes. " It is time now for data rather than diatribe. " ____________________________________ SOURCES: Edmondson, D.A. ls of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, February 2005; vol 94: pp 234-239. Horner, W.E. ls of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, February 2005; vol 94: pp 213-215. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.