Re: [PROVE] Vaccination Foes Needling Doctors

[Guest guest]

Just a few comments on this typical hogwash.

" But while and a growing population of like-minded parents share

their concerns out loud and on the Internet, others, including a

majority of hospital doctors, say those " cocktails " - also known as

vaccines - are crucial to saving lives. "

" Kara , 53, although not an expert... "

Kara is first of all a woman and secondly " not an expert " , well

of course! Another " stupid " mother out there along with this " growing

population of like-minded PARENTS sharing their concerns out loud on

the INTERNET. " Ah yes, the Internet! That's always the

problem--uncensored information where truth can be found. The

opposition to these " uneducated " mothers and parents are none other

than the " experts " , hospital doctors. You see the mind-control here?

" A quick Web search on " vaccination risks " will gather a variety of

Web sites on the subject. "

As always, the only issue at hand is risk, which is supposedly rare.

" According to Diane Chipman, immunization coordinator for the Utah

County Department of Health, vaccines are constantly being improved.

For example, Chipman says vaccines created after 1999 for infants no

longer use trace amounts of mercury. "

Uh, was something wrong with mercury in the first place? Why remove it

if no link to brain damage has been proven, according to them? Take

note of " trace amounts " , ha ha. The whole statement is a lie anyways.

" Anyone who would rationally look at (vaccinations) could not at all

question that the benefits outweigh the risks, " Miner said.

Oh there we go again, the " benefits outweigh the risks " boo-hoo as if

there are any benefits at all. This is what's being programmed into

the minds of the people. How about the foundational germ theory being

a concern? The ingredients? How they are made? The history? And what

about the superstitious concept of injecting diseased filth into

healthy humans? We don't hear about these things from the propaganda

machine, just the same old tired line about " benefits versus risks " .

" Bill Lawler, a chiropractic physician in Cedar Hills, disagrees. "

Very clever choice, a chiropractor. In other words, a " quack " , as this

profession is most associated with what the true quacks consider

quackery. We must be careful with typical writings like this and be

alert for the brainwashing tactics that come with them.

Dan

[Guest guest]

Dan, this is a great summary of how I feel about any vaccination

propaganda. Very well put, excellent.

It is very important that we contiunally " see through " this kind of

propaganda and seek the truth!

Ingrid

>

> Just a few comments on this typical hogwash.

>

>

> " But while and a growing population of like-minded parents share

> their concerns out loud and on the Internet, others, including a

> majority of hospital doctors, say those " cocktails " - also known as

> vaccines - are crucial to saving lives. "

>

> " Kara , 53, although not an expert... "

>

> Kara is first of all a woman and secondly " not an expert " , well

> of course! Another " stupid " mother out there along with this " growing

> population of like-minded PARENTS sharing their concerns out loud on

> the INTERNET. " Ah yes, the Internet! That's always the

> problem--uncensored information where truth can be found. The

> opposition to these " uneducated " mothers and parents are none other

> than the " experts " , hospital doctors. You see the mind-control here?

>

> " A quick Web search on " vaccination risks " will gather a variety of

> Web sites on the subject. "

>

> As always, the only issue at hand is risk, which is supposedly rare.

>

> " According to Diane Chipman, immunization coordinator for the Utah

> County Department of Health, vaccines are constantly being improved.

> For example, Chipman says vaccines created after 1999 for infants no

> longer use trace amounts of mercury. "

>

> Uh, was something wrong with mercury in the first place? Why remove it

> if no link to brain damage has been proven, according to them? Take

> note of " trace amounts " , ha ha. The whole statement is a lie anyways.

>

> " Anyone who would rationally look at (vaccinations) could not at all

> question that the benefits outweigh the risks, " Miner said.

>

> Oh there we go again, the " benefits outweigh the risks " boo-hoo as if

> there are any benefits at all. This is what's being programmed into

> the minds of the people. How about the foundational germ theory being

> a concern? The ingredients? How they are made? The history? And what

> about the superstitious concept of injecting diseased filth into

> healthy humans? We don't hear about these things from the propaganda

> machine, just the same old tired line about " benefits versus risks " .

>

> " Bill Lawler, a chiropractic physician in Cedar Hills, disagrees. "

>

> Very clever choice, a chiropractor. In other words, a " quack " , as this

> profession is most associated with what the true quacks consider

> quackery. We must be careful with typical writings like this and be

> alert for the brainwashing tactics that come with them.

>

>

> Dan

>