The INEFFECTIVE Flu Vaccines

[Guest guest]

>From: " G. King " <drking@...>

The following email was sent to the New York

Times today along with my contact address and

telephone number:

Re: Your 16 Dec. 2006 article titled:

" After Shortage, Vaccine for Flu Goes Unused "

by Maxwell for The New York Times

Sirs,

In spite of two recent scientific publications

[1,2] that prove:

1. The inactivated-influenza vaccines are NOT

effective in preventing those inoculated

from getting influenza, and

2. Said " flu vaccines " are not effective in

stopping the spread of influenza,

the mainstream media has continued to:

a. Hype the need for a " flu shot " and

b. Hide the scientific proof that the

influenza vaccines are NOT effective from

the American public.

In addition, though the oft-published:

" people should be immunized to reduce the

estimated 36,000 deaths and 200,000

hospitalizations a year from influenza "

is again reported in this article,

the writer failed to note:

1. These estimated numbers are NOT based on

any real-world data, BUT are derived from a

MODEL crafted by those who PROMOTE this

vaccination program, and

2. Based on the federal government's own

reported data [1] for " flu " deaths and

hospital discharges in the period from

1979 to 2000, there were between 604 and

3006 " flu " deaths (with a mean of about

1270) and between about 13,000 and 44,000

" hospitalizations " with a mean of less

than 26,000 for the years where data was

available.

Simply put, this self-serving MODEL estimated

an average level of " deaths " 28 times higher than

the historical data's average supports and a

level of " hospitalizations " more than 7 times the

historical data's average.

Moreover, with misdirection a magician might

admire, the healthcare establishment and health

officials, with the media's assistance, have misled

the American public by claiming to remove

Thimerosal from the childhood vaccination

program.

In reality, they added the Thimerosal-preserved

influenza vaccines to not only the childhood

vaccination program but also, without proof of

safety or reproductive toxicity studies to prove

safety to the developing child, recommended the

inoculation of pregnant women with Thimerosal-

preserved influenza vaccines.

Influenza vaccines that, based on the federal

government's own data, they KNEW to be

INEFFECTIVE in preventing those inoculated

from getting influenza if exposed to it.

Thus, EXCEPT to replace the poisonous Thimerosal

that was being " removed " (actually, only reduced)

from the " other " childhood vaccines, WHAT is the

scientific justification for adding these ineffective

Thimerosal-preserved " flu " vaccines to the vaccination

schedule for our children and recommending them

for pregnant women?

The answer seems to be: these recommendations

were made to ensure the ongoing mercury poisoning

of developing children while claiming that the

risk to mercury poisoning by Thimerosal in children

was being reduced.

This seems so because there is no other logical reason

to add injections of any amount of Thimerosal into

developing children AFTER Thimerosal's toxicity was

recognized by the federal government, the vaccine

makers and the medical community, who, in 1999, ALL

pledged to remove Thimerosal from vaccines as quickly

as possible and then began breaking that pledge in

2000.

Hopefully, the American people will also remember

to hold the mainstream media accountable when they

realize that the healthcare establishment has been

KNOWINGLY mercury poisoning fetuses, babies,

children, adults, and the elderly by recommending

that these groups get INEFFECTIVE influenza-vaccine

shots-- the majority (> 90 %) of which still contain

some level of Thimerosal when no level of Thimerosal

has been PROVEN SAFE by the proper toxicity studies.

[NOTE: Thimerosal toxicity has been proven in

developing human neurons at level below 1 part

per billion (< 1 part in 1,000,000,000) (3;

Parran et al. 2005) when more than 80% of all

inactivated-influenza vaccine doses still contain

Thimerosal at a level of 100 parts per million

(< 1 part in 10,000) -- a level 100,000 times

higher than the level at which lethal human

neural toxicity has been established.]

Respectfully,

Dr. King

http://www.dr-king.com

REFERENCES:

>

>1. A. Geier, G. King, and

> Mark R. Geier. Influenza Vaccine:

> Review of effectiveness of the

> U.S. immunization program, and

> policy considerations. JAP & S (Journal

> of American Physicians and Surgeons)

> 2006 Fall; 11(3): 69-74.

>

>2. Tom Jefferson. Influenza vaccination:

> Policy versus evidence. BMJ (British

> Medical Journal) 2006 October 28; 333:

> 912-915.

>3. Parran DK, Barker A, Ehrich M. Effects of

> thimerosal on NGF signal transduction and

> cell death in neuroblastoma cells. Toxicol Sci.

> 2005 Jul;86(1):132-40. Epub 2005 Apr 20.

> PMID: 15843506

>

[if you need a copy of either of the first two

references and CANNOT find them, please

send me a direct email and I can provide

you a copy for your research in this area.]

--------------------------------------------------------

Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath

Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UK

Vaccines - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm