Guest guest Posted January 10, 2008 Report Share Posted January 10, 2008 I've been reading about a lot about the use of BH4 but something have been confounding me lately. When you look at the theories of Drs Pall, Dr. Cheney, Dr. Bell, etc.. there is the realization that we are producing excess nitric oxide in our bodies. Nitric oxide when paired with super oxide leads to peroxynitrite, or cell death. I realize that 0 bh4 molecules generates peroxynitrite, and 1 bh4 molecule generates super oxide, but when you have 2 bh4 generating nitric oxide and it isn't paired with l-citrulline in the urea cycle, it doesn't re-convert to arginine! I haven't heard of many people supplementing with l-citrulline, and I've seen pretty low numbers on UAAs for myself and others. Why isn't there more of an emphasis on supplementation with urea cycle metabolites so that ammonia is detoxified via its natural route (the urea cycle), and why isn't there an emphasis on l-citrulline especially so that nitric oxide isn't free to roam and combine with super oxide?? I would love to hear people's feedback on this, but I'm just trying to play the devil's advocate in suggesting that supplementing with BH4 (which many are starting to do) might cause more good than harm since we already have an excess of nitric oxide in our bodies due to immune abnormalities (the initial infection causes a cascade reaction -> upregulated cytokines and other mediators -> high nitric oxide). As Dr. Bell says, high nitric oxide and poor nitric oxide metabolism explains the vasculopathy (orthostatic intolerance), central sensitization (sensitivities to food, temperature, light, sound etc), and cellular hypoxia (impaired ATP production). -joey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.