Guest guest Posted January 12, 2008 Report Share Posted January 12, 2008 Livesimply, you might want to research a notorious infection that was associated with these events: " Trench Fever " . Notice the historical disparity that extremely violent wars of the past were not consistently associated with this phenomenon. Yet WW1 was, for some " unknown " reason. Bartonella neurotoxins! - LiveSimply <quackadillian@...> wrote: > > There is a mechanism that is increasingly well understood called > neurogenesis, basically the creation of neural connections, which is > blocked by both extreme psychological stress hormones and toxins. If > that process of neurogeneis is stopped, people develop depression, > they start having memory problems, their bodies start changing in many > ways, some irreversible, if the stress goes on long enough. > > They started discovering this in World War I when some British and > French soldiers basically lost their minds in the trenches and ended > up being executed for 'cowardice in the face of enemy fire' because > they were sick and couldn't fight (and so they in a sense 'refused' to > attack the enemy) > > They couldn't walk, had a strange shuffling gait. They had to be tied > to the poles in front of the firing squad. We now know that to be > caused by neurotoxins. Our own bodies make some neurotoxins sometimes. > > The execution of innocent men to frighten others in their resolve to > fight causes a particular kind of uncontrollable stress that is also > caused by the threat of losing all one holds dear. > > Its a historical fact that armies do certainly carry out military > executions for cowardice. However, selecting individuals at random and > executing them as a punishment for the sins of the whole group causes > much more stress and I think that there are parallels in mold illness. > In a sense, those unwilling or unable to afford the 'safe' > environments are punished so that the safe environments 'value' is > increased through fear. > > Otherwise if it was too safe it might not be held to be worth what > people are willing to pay for it. The function of looking the other > way is in a sense to scare the 'overly' economical. Perhaps this is > why so many people who can't afford them have been willing to take out > loans in order to get out of rental housing and into housing they own? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.