Re: Graham-Stetzer Microsurge (Stetzeriser)

[Guest guest]

I was interested in it and found mainly advertising stuff (and the

pubmed article looks like a form of advertising :-( )

I did find this about iy

http://www.tgacrp.com.au/index.cfm?pageID=13 & special=complaint_single &

complaintID=917

And this conclusion (which is good to keep handy when looking at

'disguised advertising on the web'

" Material from the product manufacturer that has not been subjected to

appropriate review is likely to be self-serving. News articles from

internet sites do not carry scientific weight. Anecdotal evidence is

not sufficient to support strong scientific claims. In the absence of

any other evidence from the advertiser that the product could offer

the benefits advertised, the Panel considered that the advertisement

was in breach of ...and found this aspect of the complaint to be

justified. "

The cost of it is definitely 'premimum' for the probable cost of

manufacture ( < $1.00 each).

There's a Q & A with the inventor at

http://www.powerlinefacts.com/Expert%20Testimony/Havas.htm and states

" The problem is that individuals have no way of reducing

electromagnetic fields in a home if the primary source is from power

lines run by public utilities. "