Guest guest Posted December 16, 2008 Report Share Posted December 16, 2008 The person speaking in the video clip is Judy Mikovits, PhD. She doesn't say that her lab expects to discover THE virus. She says, " " We have identified and are in the process of isolating A new virus that MAY cause CFS in this cohort... That was discovered here, in this lab. " Perhaps I'm naive, but it seems to me that she talks like a scientist and that her credentials and experience are outstanding: http://www.wpinstitute.org/about/about_execboard.html Mikovits also said in the video clip, " The one [test] we have developed with the five cytokines and chemokines could within the next year be validated as a diagnostic for CFS, clinically. " In the video clip she doesn't say how it might be validated. I posted this only because it's research, along with other research, that gives me hope. Many on this list, at least in the past, had RNaseL and NK cell testing done. The Whittemore- website says they are " ...building on previous studies of NK cells by Dr. Klimas and the RNase L work of Drs. Suhadolnik and Silverman... The study titles and descriptions of the basic research are here, and contain the names of many familiar researchers: http://www.wpinstitute.org/research/research_basic.html All the researchers are working from the same samples, which come from their own repository--the world's largest for CFS/ME. Sue B. > [Moderator: If it is a new virus that causes CFIDS to add to the known list of those that can induce CFIDS -- that is good new.If they are asserting they may discover THE virus -- then they are very likely wrong and approaching the issue with a major false assumptions] > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2008 Report Share Posted December 16, 2008 I must confess that I still sit around shaking my head. They think they might find a new viral cause. They think cfs is caused by a virus. BUT THEY TAKE EVERY PATIENT WHO TESTS POSITIVE FOR BORRELIA AND REMOVE THEM FROM ANY STUDY OF CFS SAYING THEY DON'T HAVE CFS, THEY NOW HAVE LYME????? Am I the only one who thinks this is assinine? I know, I know, we don't know how all the viruses and bacteria interact to destroy the immune and endocrine system, but still, how can you just arbitrarily take borrelia off the table? I do not think these people are smart, and I cannot respect their work. They are getting funding to study viruses and definitions of cfs symptoms. That's just the old " look for what you can't find under the lamppost. Never mind that you lost it in the dark alley. " a Carnes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2008 Report Share Posted December 16, 2008 Hi, a. In defense of Judy Mikowitz (who, by the way, is VERY smart) and the group at the Whittemore- Institute, I suspect that they are studying samples from the original Incline Village outbreak that Dr. has kept frozen for 20+ years, and I don't have trouble believing that this outbreak might have been caused by a very virulent virus. I think Dr. believes this, and I know for a fact that Dr. Cheney does. As you know, I have suggested that genetic predisposition is an important factor in the sporadic cases of CFS, but I have been careful to say that I think the genetic factor is less important in the epidemics or clusters, because so many people in one place were involved during the same limited period of time, suggesting that their genetic makeup may not have been very important in determining whether they " caught " it. The CFS population as currently defined is very heterogeneous. Let's give this group credit for studying at least one subset, and actually the original subset that brought the CDC into the picture and at least led to a case definition and some recognition for the disorder, even though the definition is not very precise, and even though they probably should have taken a closer look to see if they were actually dealing with ME in Incline Village. I believe in the divide and conquer approach to the CFS subsets, because I think it is the only way we are going to succeed, and this group seems to be taking that approach. I don't disagree that more attention is needed to the connection between Lyme disease and CFS, and in fact, as you know, I'm planning to present a poster paper on a possible link at the March 2009 IACFS/ME conference in Reno, which has been accepted. Best regards, Rich Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 17, 2008 Report Share Posted December 17, 2008 Well CFS is a syndrome as its defined. A (rather large) set of symptoms with no officially known cause. Many of these symptoms can be caused by other (known) illnesses. To get the diagnosis of CFS in the first place, they are supposed to exclude those illnesses. Some of those illnesses are hard to diagnose and don't have reliable tests (such as lyme). So in the strictest sense, if you have the symptoms of " CFS " and then are later found to have Lyme disease, you no longer have the " syndrome " CFS, but you technically have Lyme disease. With respect to the WPI, they probably feel they are screening people for Lyme adequately and concentrating on those who appear to have symptoms that qualify for " CFS " (meaning they can't find what causes them). Whether it is possible to accurately rule Lyme out with todays testing is another story... Its all semantics and technicalities. They chose not to research Lyme because they think CFS is a different entity than Lyme. Time will tell if they are right... > I must confess that I still sit around shaking my head. They think > they might find a new viral cause. They think cfs is caused by a > virus. BUT THEY TAKE EVERY PATIENT WHO TESTS POSITIVE FOR BORRELIA > AND REMOVE THEM FROM ANY STUDY OF CFS SAYING THEY DON'T HAVE CFS, > THEY NOW HAVE LYME????? Am I the only one who thinks this is assinine? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 17, 2008 Report Share Posted December 17, 2008 > > Hi, a. > > In defense of Judy Mikowitz (who, by the way, is VERY smart) and the > group at the Whittemore- Institute, I suspect that they are > studying samples from the original Incline Village outbreak that Dr. > has kept frozen for 20+ years, and I don't have trouble > believing that this outbreak might have been caused by a very virulent > virus. I think Dr. believes this, and I know for a fact that > Dr. Cheney does. *****Rich, there is a kind of intelligence that will win a chess game. It is not the kind that gets excited about every pawn on the board. It looks at how various pieces of the game interact. Was there a virus that went through the school at Incline Village? Was there toxic mold in the building? What about exposure to mycoplasma? Certainly tick borne pathogens could play a role in northern California. What genetically was true of the folks in the building who never got sick? (Is anyone listening to Mold Warrior?) > > As you know, I have suggested that genetic predisposition is an > important factor in the sporadic cases of CFS, but I have been careful > to say that I think the genetic factor is less important in the > epidemics or clusters, because so many people in one place were > involved during the same limited period of time, suggesting that their > genetic makeup may not have been very important in determining whether > they " caught " it. *****I don't think there is a case of cfs that isn't an epidemic. My small town in South Carolina had over 100 folks with fibromyalgia around 1997. This was unheard of in the 50s and 60s. These people were sick with something. Most of them worked in gardens and fished at the river on weekends. We all got tick bites. We also worked in toxic buildings with air conditioning and locked windows. > > The CFS population as currently defined is very heterogeneous. Let's > give this group credit for studying at least one subset, and actually > the original subset that brought the CDC into the picture and at least > led to a case definition and some recognition for the disorder, even > though the definition is not very precise, and even though they > probably should have taken a closer look to see if they were actually > dealing with ME in Incline Village. I believe in the divide and > conquer approach to the CFS subsets, because I think it is the only way > we are going to succeed, and this group seems to be taking that > approach. *****Most of the subset you say they are studying are still sick or have died. I think you should ask if any of them are still being studied. Also, what will they test for in the blood samples. I have been tested for every commonly tested virus and bacteria there is - but that didn't even include bartonella, babesia or borrelia except for a western blot without including all the bands, so negative. But I have several positive bands at IgeneX and positive urine antigen with a positive reverse western blot on that. Cheney is in North Carolina. He took no interest in my case - none when I already had a postive PCR for mycoplasma and evidence of white blood cell infection under microscopy. I am sorry, but that is not science or smart. He wasn't treating Incline Village. He was treating patients in North and South Carolina. I was the only patient in the Charlotte, NC support group who recovered at all. I have to add that I am not fully recovered and have been severely harmed by quinolone antibiotics, so I am not about to claim that there is some magic fix for borrelia infection or c. pneumonia or HHV6 etc. I am claiming that ignoring bacterial infections and claiming you have adequate tests to diagnose such is ignorance of the worst sort. > > I don't disagree that more attention is needed to the connection > between Lyme disease and CFS, and in fact, as you know, I'm planning to > present a poster paper on a possible link at the March 2009 IACFS/ME > conference in Reno, which has been accepted. *****Yes, bless your heart, I am so pleased that you include this. I also am turning increasingly toward your study indicating a need to treat the damaged immune and endocrine system of folks like myself using your approach. I'm trying some of your approach and hope to post more on how I am doing soon. I'm being treated by a doctor in California who is using a lot of your information. Right now I am focused on cataract surgery tomorrow and will be able to focus on more cfs details later. a Carnes > > Best regards, > > Rich > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 17, 2008 Report Share Posted December 17, 2008 Dr. Cheney, told me he spent many years of his CFS career " chasing bugs " . And, treating bugs. Even when clearing some of " the bugs " , the disease remained. In the case of antibiotics, many of us can barely tolerate them or a limited number of them. (This is pretty scary, when after many years ill, one has significant Cardiac abnormalities, and gets an antibiotic resistent Pneumonia, with an ever shortening list of abx to try). He has also said why make his patients " gut cripples " w/antibiotics, when they do not cure their CFS? He still believes there was a viral onset, but he told me in 2005/6, he had stopped chasing bugs, and was focusing on " the terrain " . If that is understood and corrected, the bugs will go, too, by the body's natural processes. { Scientists already have long debated the " bugs vs. terrain " question}. But, he still prescribed anti-virals, antibiotics, anti-fungals, as deemed appropriate. I believe he revisits the viral issue as more Science and more antiviral treatment and data emerges. (Current times would seem to be an example). Katrina > > > From: pjeanneus <pj7@...> > > Subject: Re: News segment on the Whittemore Institute > > > > Date: Tuesday, December 16, 2008, 9:35 PM > > > > > > Hi, a. > > > > > > In defense of Judy Mikowitz (who, by the way, is VERY > > smart) and the > > > group at the Whittemore- Institute, I suspect > > that they are > > > studying samples from the original Incline Village > > outbreak that Dr. > > > has kept frozen for 20+ years, and I > > don't have trouble > > > believing that this outbreak might have been caused by > > a very > > virulent > > > virus. I think Dr. believes this, and I know > > for a fact > > that > > > Dr. Cheney does. > > > > *****Rich, there is a kind of intelligence that will win a > > chess > > game. It is not the kind that gets excited about every pawn > > on the > > board. It looks at how various pieces of the game interact. > > Was there > > a virus that went through the school at Incline Village? > > Was there > > toxic mold in the building? What about exposure to > > mycoplasma? > > Certainly tick borne pathogens could play a role in > > northern > > California. What genetically was true of the folks in the > > building > > who never got sick? (Is anyone listening to Mold > > Warrior?) > > > > > > > > > > As you know, I have suggested that genetic > > predisposition is an > > > important factor in the sporadic cases of CFS, but I > > have been > > careful > > > to say that I think the genetic factor is less > > important in the > > > epidemics or clusters, because so many people in one > > place were > > > involved during the same limited period of time, > > suggesting that > > their > > > genetic makeup may not have been very important in > > determining > > whether > > > they " caught " it. > > > > *****I don't think there is a case of cfs that > > isn't an epidemic. My > > small town in South Carolina had over 100 folks with > > fibromyalgia > > around 1997. This was unheard of in the 50s and 60s. These > > people > > were sick with something. Most of them worked in gardens > > and fished > > at the river on weekends. We all got tick bites. We also > > worked in > > toxic buildings with air conditioning and locked windows. > > > > > > The CFS population as currently defined is very > > heterogeneous. > > Let's > > > give this group credit for studying at least one > > subset, and > > actually > > > the original subset that brought the CDC into the > > picture and at > > least > > > led to a case definition and some recognition for the > > disorder, even > > > though the definition is not very precise, and even > > though they > > > probably should have taken a closer look to see if > > they were > > actually > > > dealing with ME in Incline Village. I believe in the > > divide and > > > conquer approach to the CFS subsets, because I think > > it is the only > > way > > > we are going to succeed, and this group seems to be > > taking that > > > approach. > > > > *****Most of the subset you say they are studying are still > > sick or > > have died. I think you should ask if any of them are > > still being > > studied. Also, what will they test for in the blood > > samples. I have > > been tested for every commonly tested virus and bacteria > > there is - > > but that didn't even include bartonella, babesia or > > borrelia except > > for a western blot without including all the bands, so > > negative. But > > I have several positive bands at IgeneX and positive urine > > antigen > > with a positive reverse western blot on that. > > > > Cheney is in North Carolina. He took no interest in my case > > - none > > when I already had a postive PCR for mycoplasma and > > evidence of white > > blood cell infection under microscopy. I am sorry, but that > > is not > > science or smart. He wasn't treating Incline Village. > > He was treating > > patients in North and South Carolina. I was the only > > patient in the > > Charlotte, NC support group who recovered at all. I have to > > add that > > I am not fully recovered and have been severely harmed by > > quinolone > > antibiotics, so I am not about to claim that there is some > > magic fix > > for borrelia infection or c. pneumonia or HHV6 etc. I am > > claiming > > that ignoring bacterial infections and claiming you have > > adequate > > tests to diagnose such is ignorance of the worst sort. > > > > > > I don't disagree that more attention is needed to > > the connection > > > between Lyme disease and CFS, and in fact, as you > > know, I'm > > planning to > > > present a poster paper on a possible link at the March > > 2009 IACFS/ME > > > conference in Reno, which has been accepted. > > > > *****Yes, bless your heart, I am so pleased that you > > include this. I > > also am turning increasingly toward your study indicating a > > need to > > treat the damaged immune and endocrine system of folks like > > myself > > using your approach. I'm trying some of your approach > > and hope to > > post more on how I am doing soon. I'm being treated by > > a doctor in > > California who is using a lot of your information. > > > > Right now I am focused on cataract surgery tomorrow and > > will be able > > to focus on more cfs details later. > > > > a Carnes > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Rich > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2008 Report Share Posted December 18, 2008 Hi Cort, Okay, how about I write that no one at Incline Village completely recovered? Since I have been in the Lyme community for a few years I have to say that I haven't seen anyone there completely recover either. My husband and one son are doing well, but they still have symptoms at times. Antibiotics are not the magic fix, but neither is it wise to not use antibiotics at all. As to rapid or slow onset, I tend to think this is a product of genes and general health. The doctor thinks my son has had borrelia since birth, but he is very healthy and young, so he may be able to withstand the chronic infection. Some of the top Lyme specialists say that a rapid onset is the tick that broke the camel's back - the last tick bite you got finally pushed you under. I am sure this is true in my case. (a combo of many tick bites,mycoplasmas, viruses and a toxic building) As to the studies testing patients for Lyme - the reality is that there aren't good tests for borrelia or babesia. IgeneX is the best using western blots and reporting on all the bands. Then a reverse western blot on any positive urine antigen samples. Dr. is not doing that. One more thought, I seriously doubt that borrelia was a key player in the Incline Village outbreak. My hunch would be airborne mycoplasma, c. pneumonia, and toxic mold in the building. Through in a couple of viruses and you get a perfect storm that is all but untreatable. But to say the underlying cause is genetic, no matter the locus, makes no sense. We did not suddenly become a world of genetic mutants whose immune systems do not work. Something happened to produce new bacteria and new routes of transmission. Nothing else makes sense in terms of cause. a Carnes > > No one's listening to mold warrior. > > My understanding is that Cheney has long given up the belief that the initial trigger, whether its a virus or whatever, is important. A good portion of the Incline Village subset had a gradual onset as well. The physicians there found no reason to differentiate the infectious onset and gradual onset patients. If that was an important factor in Cheney's treatment we would have seen it in his protocols; ie separate protocols for each group. > > It's also not true that most of the Incline Village patients died or remained severely ill. Check out the end of Osler's Web; some remained very ill but a surprising number improved substantially. A follow up study found the same thing - that most had improved greatly. It actually sounded like many had recovered - which brings up the question whether there are two types of illness; a post-viral fatigue illness - that is EASIER to recover from than CFS and CFS. One study suggested this was true. > > (Check out the overview of Symposium on Viruses in CFS) > > I believe the WPI is taking a very open ended look at pathogens: my understanding is that they trying to check for every pathogen in existence using their gene expression (or whatever) tests. This means they are not ignoring Lyme disease. If it shows up in large quantities then it does, if it doesn't it doesn't. I'm sure there are people with Lyme in this disease or enterovirus or HHV6; lots of different subsets. The lucky ones have a primary infection that can be treated and the unlucky ones have a co morbid secondary infection that can be suppressed and something else wrong that cannot at this time be successfully treated. > > Good luck with the surgery! > > Cort > > > > > > From: pjeanneus <pj7@...> > > Subject: Re: News segment on the Whittemore Institute > > > > Date: Tuesday, December 16, 2008, 9:35 PM > > > > > > Hi, a. > > > > > > In defense of Judy Mikowitz (who, by the way, is VERY > > smart) and the > > > group at the Whittemore- Institute, I suspect > > that they are > > > studying samples from the original Incline Village > > outbreak that Dr. > > > has kept frozen for 20+ years, and I > > don't have trouble > > > believing that this outbreak might have been caused by > > a very > > virulent > > > virus. I think Dr. believes this, and I know > > for a fact > > that > > > Dr. Cheney does. > > > > *****Rich, there is a kind of intelligence that will win a > > chess > > game. It is not the kind that gets excited about every pawn > > on the > > board. It looks at how various pieces of the game interact. > > Was there > > a virus that went through the school at Incline Village? > > Was there > > toxic mold in the building? What about exposure to > > mycoplasma? > > Certainly tick borne pathogens could play a role in > > northern > > California. What genetically was true of the folks in the > > building > > who never got sick? (Is anyone listening to Mold > > Warrior?) > > > > > > > > > > As you know, I have suggested that genetic > > predisposition is an > > > important factor in the sporadic cases of CFS, but I > > have been > > careful > > > to say that I think the genetic factor is less > > important in the > > > epidemics or clusters, because so many people in one > > place were > > > involved during the same limited period of time, > > suggesting that > > their > > > genetic makeup may not have been very important in > > determining > > whether > > > they " caught " it. > > > > *****I don't think there is a case of cfs that > > isn't an epidemic. My > > small town in South Carolina had over 100 folks with > > fibromyalgia > > around 1997. This was unheard of in the 50s and 60s. These > > people > > were sick with something. Most of them worked in gardens > > and fished > > at the river on weekends. We all got tick bites. We also > > worked in > > toxic buildings with air conditioning and locked windows. > > > > > > The CFS population as currently defined is very > > heterogeneous. > > Let's > > > give this group credit for studying at least one > > subset, and > > actually > > > the original subset that brought the CDC into the > > picture and at > > least > > > led to a case definition and some recognition for the > > disorder, even > > > though the definition is not very precise, and even > > though they > > > probably should have taken a closer look to see if > > they were > > actually > > > dealing with ME in Incline Village. I believe in the > > divide and > > > conquer approach to the CFS subsets, because I think > > it is the only > > way > > > we are going to succeed, and this group seems to be > > taking that > > > approach. > > > > *****Most of the subset you say they are studying are still > > sick or > > have died. I think you should ask if any of them are > > still being > > studied. Also, what will they test for in the blood > > samples. I have > > been tested for every commonly tested virus and bacteria > > there is - > > but that didn't even include bartonella, babesia or > > borrelia except > > for a western blot without including all the bands, so > > negative. But > > I have several positive bands at IgeneX and positive urine > > antigen > > with a positive reverse western blot on that. > > > > Cheney is in North Carolina. He took no interest in my case > > - none > > when I already had a postive PCR for mycoplasma and > > evidence of white > > blood cell infection under microscopy. I am sorry, but that > > is not > > science or smart. He wasn't treating Incline Village. > > He was treating > > patients in North and South Carolina. I was the only > > patient in the > > Charlotte, NC support group who recovered at all. I have to > > add that > > I am not fully recovered and have been severely harmed by > > quinolone > > antibiotics, so I am not about to claim that there is some > > magic fix > > for borrelia infection or c. pneumonia or HHV6 etc. I am > > claiming > > that ignoring bacterial infections and claiming you have > > adequate > > tests to diagnose such is ignorance of the worst sort. > > > > > > I don't disagree that more attention is needed to > > the connection > > > between Lyme disease and CFS, and in fact, as you > > know, I'm > > planning to > > > present a poster paper on a possible link at the March > > 2009 IACFS/ME > > > conference in Reno, which has been accepted. > > > > *****Yes, bless your heart, I am so pleased that you > > include this. I > > also am turning increasingly toward your study indicating a > > need to > > treat the damaged immune and endocrine system of folks like > > myself > > using your approach. I'm trying some of your approach > > and hope to > > post more on how I am doing soon. I'm being treated by > > a doctor in > > California who is using a lot of your information. > > > > Right now I am focused on cataract surgery tomorrow and > > will be able > > to focus on more cfs details later. > > > > a Carnes > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Rich > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2008 Report Share Posted December 18, 2008 Cheney did not, to my knowledge, test his patients for mycoplasmas in the late 1990s. I have never heard of him using IgeneX to test for borrelia in any patients. He told an audience that he worried about antibiotics damaging the gut. At the question time I stood and mentioned that Zithromax had cured all my gut problems. The audience went nuts. One woman asked Cheney if she should take Zithromax. He kind of freaked out, turned red in the face and said, " We don't relly know what Zithromax is doing. " Then he changed the subject. I don't consdier that " chasing bugs. " What am I missing? I believe in treating the terrain. Obviously antibiotics are not CURING Lyme or cfs. Neither is Ampligen or Valcyte. We are going to have to put the whole thing together. We are probably not going to see a cure in our lifetimes. But we might get better. a Carnes > > > Dr. Cheney, told me he spent many years of his CFS career " chasing bugs " . > > And, treating bugs. Even when clearing some of " the bugs " , the disease remained. > > In the case of antibiotics, many of us can barely tolerate them or a limited number of them. > > (This is pretty scary, when after many years ill, one has significant Cardiac abnormalities, and gets an antibiotic resistent Pneumonia, with an ever shortening list of abx to try). > > He has also said why make his patients " gut cripples " w/antibiotics, when they do not cure their CFS? > > He still believes there was a viral onset, but he told me in 2005/6, he had stopped chasing bugs, and was focusing on " the terrain " . If that is understood and corrected, the bugs will go, too, by the body's natural processes. > { Scientists already have long debated the " bugs vs. terrain " question}. > > But, he still prescribed anti-virals, antibiotics, anti-fungals, as deemed appropriate. > > I believe he revisits the viral issue as more Science and more antiviral treatment and data emerges. (Current times would seem to be an example). > > Katrina Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2008 Report Share Posted December 18, 2008 I felt that the qustion on mold was also avoided by them/the lecture by dr peterson that I attended. amy > > I must confess that I still sit around shaking my head. They think > they might find a new viral cause. They think cfs is caused by a > virus. BUT THEY TAKE EVERY PATIENT WHO TESTS POSITIVE FOR BORRELIA > AND REMOVE THEM FROM ANY STUDY OF CFS SAYING THEY DON'T HAVE CFS, > THEY NOW HAVE LYME????? Am I the only one who thinks this is assinine? > > I know, I know, we don't know how all the viruses and bacteria > interact to destroy the immune and endocrine system, but still, how > can you just arbitrarily take borrelia off the table? > > I do not think these people are smart, and I cannot respect their > work. They are getting funding to study viruses and definitions of > cfs symptoms. That's just the old " look for what you can't find under > the lamppost. Never mind that you lost it in the dark alley. " > > a Carnes > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2008 Report Share Posted December 18, 2008 Thats a good question. What *is* Zithromax doing? I have heard completely opposing opinions from various Drs. The Lyme guys say its treating a bacteria, the CFSIDS guys say it " modulates the cytokine response " and some other docs say it just supresses bad bacteria in the gut. Considering a subset of CFS people seem to respond well to this drug, shouldn't the researches be trying to figure this one out? I'd be curious to see how many people feel better on Zithromax, maybe I should start a poll... and do people who take it " herx " , or get worse before getting better? Where is the science that says it does one thing or another? Is there any basis for the claim that it " modulates cytokines " or " treats lyme " or whatever? Citations? A > He kind of freaked out, turned red in the face and said, " We don't > relly know what Zithromax is doing. " Then he changed the subject. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2008 Report Share Posted December 18, 2008 Cort said " > No one's listening to mold warrior. " That's not exactly true. There is a band of second-battalion mold warriors who are actually doing quite well by following 's mold-avoidance techniques, myself included. K > > > From: pjeanneus <pj7@...> > > Subject: Re: News segment on the Whittemore Institute > > > > Date: Tuesday, December 16, 2008, 9:35 PM > > > > > > Hi, a. > > > > > > In defense of Judy Mikowitz (who, by the way, is VERY > > smart) and the > > > group at the Whittemore- Institute, I suspect > > that they are > > > studying samples from the original Incline Village > > outbreak that Dr. > > > has kept frozen for 20+ years, and I > > don't have trouble > > > believing that this outbreak might have been caused by > > a very > > virulent > > > virus. I think Dr. believes this, and I know > > for a fact > > that > > > Dr. Cheney does. > > > > *****Rich, there is a kind of intelligence that will win a > > chess > > game. It is not the kind that gets excited about every pawn > > on the > > board. It looks at how various pieces of the game interact. > > Was there > > a virus that went through the school at Incline Village? > > Was there > > toxic mold in the building? What about exposure to > > mycoplasma? > > Certainly tick borne pathogens could play a role in > > northern > > California. What genetically was true of the folks in the > > building > > who never got sick? (Is anyone listening to Mold > > Warrior?) > > > > > > > > > > As you know, I have suggested that genetic > > predisposition is an > > > important factor in the sporadic cases of CFS, but I > > have been > > careful > > > to say that I think the genetic factor is less > > important in the > > > epidemics or clusters, because so many people in one > > place were > > > involved during the same limited period of time, > > suggesting that > > their > > > genetic makeup may not have been very important in > > determining > > whether > > > they " caught " it. > > > > *****I don't think there is a case of cfs that > > isn't an epidemic. My > > small town in South Carolina had over 100 folks with > > fibromyalgia > > around 1997. This was unheard of in the 50s and 60s. These > > people > > were sick with something. Most of them worked in gardens > > and fished > > at the river on weekends. We all got tick bites. We also > > worked in > > toxic buildings with air conditioning and locked windows. > > > > > > The CFS population as currently defined is very > > heterogeneous. > > Let's > > > give this group credit for studying at least one > > subset, and > > actually > > > the original subset that brought the CDC into the > > picture and at > > least > > > led to a case definition and some recognition for the > > disorder, even > > > though the definition is not very precise, and even > > though they > > > probably should have taken a closer look to see if > > they were > > actually > > > dealing with ME in Incline Village. I believe in the > > divide and > > > conquer approach to the CFS subsets, because I think > > it is the only > > way > > > we are going to succeed, and this group seems to be > > taking that > > > approach. > > > > *****Most of the subset you say they are studying are still > > sick or > > have died. I think you should ask if any of them are > > still being > > studied. Also, what will they test for in the blood > > samples. I have > > been tested for every commonly tested virus and bacteria > > there is - > > but that didn't even include bartonella, babesia or > > borrelia except > > for a western blot without including all the bands, so > > negative. But > > I have several positive bands at IgeneX and positive urine > > antigen > > with a positive reverse western blot on that. > > > > Cheney is in North Carolina. He took no interest in my case > > - none > > when I already had a postive PCR for mycoplasma and > > evidence of white > > blood cell infection under microscopy. I am sorry, but that > > is not > > science or smart. He wasn't treating Incline Village. > > He was treating > > patients in North and South Carolina. I was the only > > patient in the > > Charlotte, NC support group who recovered at all. I have to > > add that > > I am not fully recovered and have been severely harmed by > > quinolone > > antibiotics, so I am not about to claim that there is some > > magic fix > > for borrelia infection or c. pneumonia or HHV6 etc. I am > > claiming > > that ignoring bacterial infections and claiming you have > > adequate > > tests to diagnose such is ignorance of the worst sort. > > > > > > I don't disagree that more attention is needed to > > the connection > > > between Lyme disease and CFS, and in fact, as you > > know, I'm > > planning to > > > present a poster paper on a possible link at the March > > 2009 IACFS/ME > > > conference in Reno, which has been accepted. > > > > *****Yes, bless your heart, I am so pleased that you > > include this. I > > also am turning increasingly toward your study indicating a > > need to > > treat the damaged immune and endocrine system of folks like > > myself > > using your approach. I'm trying some of your approach > > and hope to > > post more on how I am doing soon. I'm being treated by > > a doctor in > > California who is using a lot of your information. > > > > Right now I am focused on cataract surgery tomorrow and > > will be able > > to focus on more cfs details later. > > > > a Carnes > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Rich > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 19, 2008 Report Share Posted December 19, 2008 I'm a little confused because is a sufferer of CFS, not a doctor or a research scientist. I'm under the impression that he would dearly love for a doctor or research scientist to look into this completely and come up with a technique. But it shouldn't be up to . Although, those of us who have experimented with his ideas have achieved a great deal of improvement. In my case, for instance, I started following his advice and achieving improvement long before we confirmed mold in my house. I left the house for a period of time and, following his clues, felt tremendous improvement within a month. Going back to the house, however, darn near killed me. Later, we did actually discover the mold in between the walls. I was also under the impression that was in the original Incline cohort, so I'm not sure how we could identify his case as " atypical " if he was of that group. I suppose, though, that you could consider it " atypical " if you are talking about CDC-CFS. Anyway, it's helping me. I can walk my dog for a mile and back, whereas a year ago I couldn't go to the bathroom by myself. That's something. And it's helping others. I'm not saying it's for you, or that everybody must do it. All I'm saying is that it's working for a growing number, and therefore I guess it should be talked about as another Experimental approach. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 21, 2008 Report Share Posted December 21, 2008 Doris, that's pretty much my story too. Almost verbatim. Khaly > > Exactly. > I am 100% cured and although I had numerous problems (mercury poisoning, EBV, HHV6, CMV, antibiotic resistant staph in my sinuses, hypercoagulation, poor immune function, hypotension, multiple chemical sensitivities, and more), it was getting away from the mold that cured me. Then one by one, everything else went away. > > Doris > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: khalyal > > Cort said " > > No one's listening to mold warrior. " > > That's not exactly true. There is a band of second-battalion mold > warriors who are actually doing quite well by following 's > mold-avoidance techniques, myself included. > > K > > . _,_._,___ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 22, 2008 Report Share Posted December 22, 2008 Thanks, Cort. It's stachybotrys that he had a problem with, and it appears to be my problem as well. Actually, what he told me was not just to get out of the house, but to get out of the house without taking anything with me. Then to go to the most pristine place possible and stay there for as long as possible. If the mold in my house was the culprit, then staying in a pristine setting long enough to feel considerably better would allow my immune response to die down. At that point, going back to the source of the problem (stachy in my house) should send me into a CNS episode quickly and severely. That's the intensification reaction, and that's exactly what happened to me. Over the course of the last year, with diligent avoidance, the intensification reaction has gotten so, well, intense, that it just takes me minutes to realize I'm in a bad place. It goes like this - change of mood for no apparent reason, then brain compression, then migraine, then floor. The intensification reaction is a blessing, because I've learned to leave at mood change, and at least not to push it past brain compression. As a result, I can live my life. There are places I can't go to and stay for great lengths of time. There are not many places that I have to avoid completely, but there are a handful. My MCS has disappeared, as have my kidney and gall bladder issues. Last year I was bedridden, drooling, and headbobbling. I'm not now. Like he says, a heck of a clue. Anyway, I know you weren't trying to make him be a research scientist. And I know he didn't do any blood tests. But we are not bloodtesting in order to pursue other experimental treatments either, such as Amygdala retraining. The proof is in the experiment, the guinea pig being the CFSer who follows the lead and either gets better or doesn't. > > > From: khalyal <khalyal@...> > > Subject: Re: News segment on the Whittemore Institute > > > > Date: Thursday, December 18, 2008, 7:46 PM > > I'm a little confused because is a sufferer of CFS, > > not a doctor > > or a research scientist. I'm under the impression that > > he would > > dearly love for a doctor or research scientist to look into > > this > > completely and come up with a technique. But it > > shouldn't be up to . > > > > Although, those of us who have experimented with his ideas > > have > > achieved a great deal of improvement. In my case, for > > instance, I > > started following his advice and achieving improvement long > > before we > > confirmed mold in my house. I left the house for a period > > of time > > and, following his clues, felt tremendous improvement > > within a month. > > Going back to the house, however, darn near killed me. > > Later, we did > > actually discover the mold in between the walls. > > > > I was also under the impression that was in the > > original Incline > > cohort, so I'm not sure how we could identify his case > > as " atypical " > > if he was of that group. I suppose, though, that you could > > consider > > it " atypical " if you are talking about CDC-CFS. > > > > Anyway, it's helping me. I can walk my dog for a mile > > and back, > > whereas a year ago I couldn't go to the bathroom by > > myself. That's > > something. And it's helping others. I'm not > > saying it's for you, or > > that everybody must do it. All I'm saying is that > > it's working for a > > growing number, and therefore I guess it should be talked > > about as > > another Experimental approach. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 22, 2008 Report Share Posted December 22, 2008 what do you mean by brain compression? > It goes like this - > change of mood for no apparent reason, then brain compression, then > migraine, then floor. The intensification reaction is a blessing, > because I've learned to leave at mood change, and at least not to push > it past brain compression. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 23, 2008 Report Share Posted December 23, 2008 Oh, he HAS done the genetic testing, at Shoemaker's request. He has the double-dreaded genetic typing, according to Shoemaker - genetic susceptibility for both mold and Lyme. > > Actually, what he told me was not just to get out of the house, but to > get out of the house without taking anything with me. > > >> Most people leave for a week and think that was a good test. The problem is if your body is completely wacked out and full of infections and all the other problems, it's going to take a lot longer than a week. You might need to leave for a month or several months. > > Anyway, I know you weren't trying to make him be a research scientist. > And I know he didn't do any blood tests. > > >> Why not? The blood test is pretty simple. A couple hundred bucks and you know if you are one of the 5% of people who can't detox mold toxins. It shouldn't be too hard to find a doctor knowledgeable about Shoemakers book / website. Or your doctor can consult with Shoemaker or you can go directly to him. > > Doris > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 27, 2008 Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 Ditto everything you've written, Doris. However, I'm only " 100% cured " insofar as I avoid mold extremely scrupulously. My sensitivity to very small amounts (e.g. on my clothes after I've briefly passed through a somewhat problematic building) makes it a challenge to stay at that " wholly well " level. Would you please share how carefully you need to pay attention to mold in order to feel well? Thanks. > > Exactly. > I am 100% cured and although I had numerous problems (mercury poisoning, EBV, HHV6, CMV, antibiotic resistant staph in my sinuses, hypercoagulation, poor immune function, hypotension, multiple chemical sensitivities, and more), it was getting away from the mold that cured me. Then one by one, everything else went away. > > Doris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.