Re: Re:Kurup paper - NOS article in nature

[Guest guest]

Slightly more information available on PubMed (only slightly):

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez

I don't really understand all this stuff, but I'm reading this as the mice

are missing

NOS in the muscle so not enough NO is being created, leading to the fatigue.

This would be oppose of Dr. Pall, right? Do I have this completely

backward?

I'm curious to hear what others who understand this more think as well.

Happy holidays! Amy

On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 10:39 PM, gdubs123 <gdubs123@...> wrote:

> Here's something cool

> http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v456/n7221/edsumm/e081127-16.html

>

> I cant read the whole article because i dont have a subscription to

> nature, but from what i am getting from it it kind of supports dr.

> palls theory.

>

> Fatigue because of problems with nitric oxide not fully causing blood

> vessels supplying the muscles to relax, after exersice.

>

> As far as i can tell it pretty much hits the nail on the head for CFS.

> I wonder if this could also be happening in the brain. My brain scans

> showed reduced blood flow.

>

> Im curious to see what the dr's here make of this article

>