Guest guest Posted July 8, 2005 Report Share Posted July 8, 2005 This is outrageous, but indicative of the nature of what is happening in this country. That poor mother. May God intervene here. I'd be happy to testify on behalf of this woman and bring my before and after tests with me. I hope that she sues that doctor and the State bigtime! Barth TOXIC MOLD SURVEY: www.presenting.net/sbs/sbssurvey.html --- PLACER CO. CPS " Mold " Civil Rights Litigation " - Doug Haney Posted by _ R. Haney_ http://counsel.net/cgi-bin/chatscripts/mailform.cgi?uid=Vgmydsk_Zsfwq52 & dmn=zgle\ sad.uge & name=+R.+Haney & subject=PLACER+ CO.+CPS+qtqtMoldqtqt+Civil+Rights+Litigationqtqt+-+Doug+Haney on 7/08/05 LATEST ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH NEWS- DOUG HANEY Doug Haney EnviroHealth Research & Consulting, Inc. E-mail: _Haney52@... Website: http://www.Myhealthrights.com Litigation Update: Mold Talk Lands Psychologist in Mental Hospital A Placer County, California litigation case I assisted in authoring ( " Complaint for Violation of the Federal Civil Rights Act, and State Law Tort Claims " Case #205-CV00771 FCD DAD) with my good friend, Herman Franck, Esq. (SB#123476) of Sacramento is being reviewed at the Federal Court Building in Sacramento. This is a case involving Ms. Kirsten Fisher, the mother of two girls, and a woman with years of experience as a professional counselor (holding a BA in Psychology from Sacramento State University, and two terms short of her Masters Degree), whose CHILDREN WERE TAKEN AWAY FROM HER BY PLACER COUNTY SOCIAL WORKERS FOR COMPLAINING TO HER FAMILY DOCTOR ABOUT HER DAUGHTER’S EXPOSURES TO WHAT SHE BELIEVED, WERE PATHOGENIC MOLDS. To summarize, on or about March 23, 2004 Ms. Fisher visited my office on another matter concerning micro fungi exposures. In reviewing the documents she presented during our meeting, Ms. Fisher alleged that when she took her children to her family doctor, Mark Knoble, M.D., that instead of thoroughly examining her daughters for their presumed mold exposures, he contacted Placer County Child and Adult Crisis & Emergency Services (ACCESS) about her apparent behavior in obsessing about mold exposures. Within a day or two Ms. Fisher’s children were ordered into county custody, and Ms. Fisher was forcibly admitted into the Heritage Oaks (Psychiatric) Hospital located in Sacramento by police. Upon leaving the hospital after a battery of psychiatric tests that confirmed only “generalized anxiety disorder”, Ms. Fisher was to spend the next 2½ months apart from her children enduring supervised visitation with her children and harsh monitoring controls set up by Children Protective Services. Ms. Fisher showed me a document, which I still have in my position titled, “Placer County Systems of Care: Unified Services Plan” which states, “Mother will not obsess about “mold” issues that risk the minors safety.” Further stating, “Mother will report to landlord immediately any sign of mold,” and “Mother will discontinue any topics of “mold issues” with the minors,” and “Mother will refrain from any discussions of “mold” to other adults in front of the minors.” All of this, in writing, a total violation of Ms. Fisher’s and her children’s federal Constitutional Rights. After hearing this, I became upset and was given permission to call Ms. Fisher’s social worker who, would not speak with me without consent of Ms. Fisher. So, I handed the telephone to Ms. Fisher for said consent. While Ms. Fisher spoke with her social worker, I directly heard the social worker state to Ms. Fisher, “If you decide to pursue this you know what it will mean!” in a very loud voice. This brought Ms. Fisher to tears of course, and the rest is history. This case is being brought to the Federal Court not just as a case against Placer County, but for the fact that it clearly represents how lightly medical doctors and public officials are taking a very serious condition relating to human health and safety and turning it on victims. We are making great strides and I will continue to bring you information about cases I am selecting which will, I hope, eventually bring “Mold Litigation” away from the Justice System and front and center into the Proper and Effective Medical Treatment arena. I do not subscribe to the vast number of cases in the court system, but I understand fully what has to be accomplished until people who choose to ignore the health implications move past “ignorance”. Micro fungi can and do KILL humans! They are first and foremost ancient (nearly two billion year old) “decomposers” designed by nature to “DECAY” and “KILL”… especially - humans! Don’t give me this absolute “CRAP” that inhaling molds does not cause severe illness in anything other than an immune compromised person!!! That is absolute “CRAP”! Don’t tell me what I as a trained scientific observer have personally witnessed in the past six years. Remember, I also used to be a skeptic about such exposures too! In some instances along the “learning curve” I might have made mistakes and have expressed things I now understand differently, but what I explain now written by scientists others is factually-based and “peer reviewed” in major scientific journals. And I currently have been making very few mistakes. So, after consulting as an expert in environmental health in two death cases involving pathogenic micro fungi exposures: Black 54, Houston, TX (2002) and a 16-month old baby, Seniff (2003), I am fed up with “CRAP” and want to “WAKE SOCIETY UP TO THE FACT” that regardless of what people from GlobalTox, Inc., or Ron Gots, M.D., or Saxton, M.D., and others who testify otherwise might have opinions on, exposures to pathogenic micro fungi can and do have the ability to kill a human being first by weakening human cellular functions and then by gradually destroying human cells. MS. FISHER, HAD A PERFECT RIGHT TO BE VERY CONCERNED AS SHOULD WE ALL! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.