Guest guest Posted June 18, 2005 Report Share Posted June 18, 2005 " Where are your references to peer reviewed evidence? " " If you have no peer reviewed evidence, then you have no science to support your theory " " If your theory has no scientific support, then there is no need to research it " " We will not research any theory that hasn't already been proven " Such is the way science regards anything new and this is the very thought process that the medical community used to dismiss Dr Barry Marshall's " unproven theory " that H PYlori could cause ulcers and flat out refuse to test a very simple and easily verfiable concept. Lack of evidence is not evidence of nonexistence and yet this is the main argument used by pseudo-scientific thinkers. " Mold doesn't kill anyone " How many times have you heard that? People use the evidence that they HAVEN'T HEARD of mold killing anyone as " proof positive " that it can not, and seem utterly convinced that they are being objective and scientifically minded. After all the nonsense I have been forced to listen to from people who are scientifically self-delusional, what better way than to just test the concept for myself? I sealed contaminated objects in a box with one of those ozone machines and let 'er rip - full blast for a few days. Took the stuff out, and it had made no difference. So in the REAL world, and the REAL conditions that dictate my comfort and survival, I choose to act in a manner which is in accordance with the REAL concept that days of ozone blasting at high concentration does not alter the effect that contaminated possessions have on me. Let alone fix an entire house. Of course, others are free to believe what they wish and ozone themselves as they please. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.