Guest guest Posted June 29, 2005 Report Share Posted June 29, 2005 > > One of the signs I discerned was a consistent correlation between > almost imperceptible exposures to mold and hypoperfusion of the > tissues. > The imprint left by socks and watchbands is an extremely good > indicator of the state of capillary perfusion. Now we're getting somewhere -- it's this kind of practical advice that will allow people to verify your protocols, . It also explains why my hands and feet feel like they've been slammed in a door in the mornings when I'm in a contaminated space. I hope this does not mean tissue death. I'm now taking Creatine to support this, we'll see. Give people more concrete input like this, and we can probably avoid the charged exchanges we've been seeing here lately. Help us confirm your observations! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 30, 2005 Report Share Posted June 30, 2005 Regarding: capillary hypoperfusion and check your socks: I just noticed today that the soles of my feet are yellow. I'll have to see if this continues. A couple of times my doctor has thought my skin looked yellow and had my liver checked but it came out okay so far. Could this be hypofusion?? I had these same two questions and also, what was 'check your socks' about? > check your socks? huh? > > and capillary hypoperfusion means that your blood supply isn't getting thru the capillaries as would be considered " normal " . therefore, the blood & oxygen supply isn't getting thru your body the same as before.....to what extent, i have no idea. > > take care, all. > victoria > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 12, 2005 Report Share Posted July 12, 2005 > I'd love to know the details of how you manage extreme avoidance. I'm looking for ideas for my own family. > Sue , Learn to Hang Glide. That's where I learned my basic philosophy of mold avoidance. Ok, I know that you aren't going to, but consider this. You cannot see thermals, so how does a Hang Glider Pilot find 'em? By looking for associated conditions and phenomena! We have seen by bitter experience that our senses do not typically give enough information to sufficiently warn people of impending immunological failure from mold exposure. Relying on " Mold Hits " isn't enough. So you do the same thing a Hang Glider pilot does when looking for something invisible. Look for the associated phenomena, then " turn into the thermal " and see if the outcome matches the prediction. In the case of mold, memorize the subtlest indicators of exposure that you consistently experience, and treat these as signs of contamination. If you perceive these signs along with the associated conditions, it adds up a " likliehood " . Test the " likliehood " by determining if your inflammatory response is rising up like a kite or sailing along unperturbed in flat air. It is the 'differential' in whether you are " going up or down " that shapes the course and duration of your immunological flight - and not merely whether it's a bumpy ride. Relying on " mold hits " alone is like mistaking turbulence for thermals, and it just plain isn't enoough information. You must constantly monitor whether you are gaining or losing altitude over time in order to guage progress. It's odd that two of the strange skills that I picked up, " biological warfare training " in the military, and Hang Gliding should have combined to give me a " critical edge " that helped me in my approach, but if it had been otherwise, I wouldn't still be flying around to make this strange claim that these techniques were the ones that gave me this advantage. It's fun to run this concept past sailplane pilots because they " get it " immediately thanks to their training. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.