Guest guest Posted July 31, 2005 Report Share Posted July 31, 2005 , Good question. Mold rarely causes the typical " hay fever " type symptoms for me. It's all the other " stuff " that I experience. Same for most of my clients, too. Carl Grimes Healthy Habitats LLC ----- > Is there anybody in this group who is troubled by mold as a nuisance > characterized by allergic symptoms? Sniffling, sneezing, watery eyes > and breathing difficulties? > > Or are you here because exposures of an unbelievably low level can > have lingering and devastating effects that can remove your ability to > think, stand up and function like a normal human? > > If mold was nothing more to me than an annoying structural defect and > a watery eyed sneeze now and then, I sure as Hell wouldn't be here. > - > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 2005 Report Share Posted July 31, 2005 I Is there anybody in this group who is troubled by mold as a nuisance characterized by allergic symptoms? Sniffling, sneezing, watery eyes and breathing difficulties? I am a teacher who got very sick from the school where I taught for 14 yrs. I began to get very sick with muscle aches, then the joints began to hurt, blinding headaches, & stabbing pains in my legs that traveled down my legs. I developed muscle twitches, slurred speech, blurred vision, coma like fatigue, itchy skin, memory loss, & the list goes on. Two inspections were done and the mold inspector said that the levels were at low levels & shouldn't be harmful to humans. However, in one report he stated that some of the molds found could cause problems to the immune system, the nervous system, the kidneys and liver! I am & many others are walking proof that it doesn't matter at what levels the mold is. MOLD IS MOLD, dead or alive and is HARMFUL!!!!! It certainly does affect your ability to think, stand, speak and even sleep!!!!!!!!!! I agree that mold can make you sneeze, cough, but what I & many others suffer IS NOT ALLERGY BASED whatsoever!!!!! I suffered from allergies while in the school but haven't had any of those problems since leaving, but I would gladly put up with allergies over the other problems I have now!!!!!! Sue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 2005 Report Share Posted July 31, 2005 I can't function as a normal human being. When doctors start addressing it as an allergy, I get weary as it is that is so lightweight compared to problems I am experiencing. If it were an allergy, I could get help 'everywhere', instead of flying out of town for help. ----- Original Message ----- From: " erikmoldwarrior " <erikmoldwarrior@...> > Or are you here because exposures of an unbelievably low level can > have lingering and devastating effects that can remove your ability to > think, stand up and function like a normal human? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 2005 Report Share Posted July 31, 2005 ssr3351@... answered: > " Is there anybody in this group who is troubled by mold as a > nuisance > characterized by allergic symptoms? Sniffling, sneezing, watery eyes > and breathing difficulties? " > > by saying: > > " I am a teacher who got very sick from the school where I taught for > 14 yrs. > I began to get very sick with muscle aches, then the joints began to > hurt, > blinding headaches, & stabbing pains in my legs that traveled down my > legs. I > developed muscle twitches, slurred speech, blurred vision, coma like > fatigue, > itchy skin, memory loss, & the list goes on.... " I too taught since 1991 in a brand new library, which leaked from its opening. I have no allergies. I was tested for allergies. None. I've never bothered by pollen or cats, still Im not bothered by forests or animals...etc. HOWEVER during the last four years of teaching developed constant dizziness, tingling in extremeties, fogginess, inability to follow a thought to an end, the feeling of aconstant musous " plug " in my throat not going down ever, and a prevailing tiredness. After the school found mold and pulled the huge rug up without precautions, my going back in to put the books back in order sealed my fate. I lost my voice, it hurt to talk, I whispered. I had shortness of breath and extreme extreme fatigue and inability to breath in without intence pain in my chest lasting hours. I felt like Id swallowed whole hot peppers. It was like strep throat where I wished for only breathing out, to avoid the pain of breathing in- After my dr. prescribed prednisone, I developed chemical intolerance and have been in much of a bubble for over a year. what began as a mycotoxin induced poisoning has made my body prone to chemical overreactions - so no- I was not allergic I was poisoned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 2005 Report Share Posted July 31, 2005 I'm sure I was exposed to many more molds than what they found. The molds that I was exposed to are Cladosporium, Penicillium, Aspergillus versicolor, Aureobasidium, Alternaria, Trichoderma, Aspergillus glaucus, Aspergillus nidulans, Fusarium, Aspergillus fumigatus, Paecilomyces & probably many more. I started on allergy shots yrs. ago because my allergy attacks were unbearable, but I haven't had one allergy shot or pill since leaving!! I have been a patient of Dr. Shoemaker's for over a yr. and am pretty much symptom free & feeling soooooooo much better. He was able to prove without a doubt that my exposure was from the school. He put me on & off medication and in & out of the bldg. each time testing my blood which confirmed it all!! Absolute nightmare with no job, but at least I have my health.I honestly was so sick I felt like I was dying & on some days wished I would. I still worry about all the kids still there breathing all those toxins everyday. Sue In a message dated 7/31/05 12:17:15 PM Pacific Daylight Time, kathywnb@... writes: Sue, Do you know what the molds were? Also, mold levels can vary at different times of the year. For example, at the place where I worked, one month there was almost none and the next month it had sky rocketed, so you may have been exposed to more than you think. I have had all of the symptoms you and others mention as well as others. I used to be allergic to molds, but am not any more. I too would much rather have the " regular " type of allergies. I took allergy shots for several years and they didn't help. Have you had blood IgG antibodies done to check for mold and toxin exposure? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 2005 Report Share Posted July 31, 2005 From: " J. Page " <apage1@...> After my dr. prescribed prednisone, I developed chemical > intolerance and have been in much of a bubble for over a year. what > began as a mycotoxin induced poisoning has made my body prone to > chemical overreactions - > so no- > I was not allergic > I was poisoned. I'm sorry all this happened to you. I'm not that familiar with prednisone but have heard others have been prescribed prednisone for mold and MCS. Could you explain or give link how prednisone can lead to MCS? Did I read this correctly or was there no connection between the prednisone and your MCS. Thanks, Rosie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 2005 Report Share Posted July 31, 2005 Sue, Do you know what the molds were? Also, mold levels can vary at different times of the year. For example, at the place where I worked, one month there was almost none and the next month it had sky rocketed, so you may have been exposed to more than you think. I have had all of the symptoms you and others mention as well as others. I used to be allergic to molds, but am not any more. I too would much rather have the " regular " type of allergies. I took allergy shots for several years and they didn't help. Have you had blood IgG antibodies done to check for mold and toxin exposure? ssr3351@... wrote: I Is there anybody in this group who is troubled by mold as a nuisance characterized by allergic symptoms? Sniffling, sneezing, watery eyes and breathing difficulties? I am a teacher who got very sick from the school where I taught for 14 yrs. I began to get very sick with muscle aches, then the joints began to hurt, blinding headaches, & stabbing pains in my legs that traveled down my legs. I developed muscle twitches, slurred speech, blurred vision, coma like fatigue, itchy skin, memory loss, & the list goes on. Two inspections were done and the mold inspector said that the levels were at low levels & shouldn't be harmful to humans. However, in one report he stated that some of the molds found could cause problems to the immune system, the nervous system, the kidneys and liver! I am & many others are walking proof that it doesn't matter at what levels the mold is. MOLD IS MOLD, dead or alive and is HARMFUL!!!!! It certainly does affect your ability to think, stand, speak and even sleep!!!!!!!!!! I agree that mold can make you sneeze, cough, but what I & many others suffer IS NOT ALLERGY BASED whatsoever!!!!! I suffered from allergies while in the school but haven't had any of those problems since leaving, but I would gladly put up with allergies over the other problems I have now!!!!!! Sue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 2005 Report Share Posted July 31, 2005 Kathy - I understand about being concerned for others in the environment that got you sick. But to some degree, we probably have to realize that we are the coalmine canaries. In my situation, I was the first to get sick - days before anyone else. Of those still living (two of the former building occupants are dead, and another is dying at last report), I am the only one still not sufficiently recovered to be working. The majority suffered what appear to be respiratory problems rather than CFS. My understanding at this point is that the sensitization is a progressive thing. I had been exposed years earlier, and had already been sick from it for a couple of years. The first time, I got better with time and distance (and meds that masked the symptoms). This time, I just couldn't do it. Of course, that marks me as a probable malingerer in the employer's eyes, right? Based on various things I have read and personal stories I have heard, I have an idea that some people will detox slowly on their own over a period of time and become functional again. As my local doc put it - you have to think about total toxin load as well as mycotoxins and individual vulnerabilities and exposures. Shoemaker can test for the genetic vulnerability - but that alone does not describe everything that happens. A lesser exposure in a healthier person not carrying a major toxin load (or a male - they don't get this stuff nearly as often) is simply not going to be the same thing as what happens to a vulnerable person already sensitized and already carrying an existing toxin load - which is highly likely, given the vulnerability and lack of available treatment for the vast majority of us. At some point, you hit the limit of what that particular body can withstand. You hit it. I hit it. All hell breaks loose, and it's never precisely the same in any two people, nor even in a single person all day, every day. Other people seem to do ok with lesser measures such as avoidance techniques alone. For those who can't detox well enough to regain their health, all the avoidance in the world won't get it done. The poisons remain, endlessly recirculating inside the body and doing their damage. Until those are addressed, things won't get better. I take from this the thought that, the minute you hear a blanket statement about mold, mycotoxins, how to deal with them, or how they affect everyone (or on any other subject, for that matter!) - that is the time to stop and think about what you're hearing, because that's an agenda - not an experience. Shoemaker and the guys like him didn't arrive at their present learning by generalizing first and getting specific later. The did the opposite - listened to individual experiences, and eventually assimilated that into an understanding of the whole, which could in turn be used to benefit the individual. Good analytical work always operates in both directions. You work from the specifics to the broader picture and back to the specifics again. Systems are like that - whether they are buildings or bodies or patterns of illness. Caring for and about mold victims is the same. There may be broader " rules " and issues, but they only work insofar as they serve the specific victim. And when they don't, you have to re-check the original premise - or at least the speaker's agenda. [The obvious Ayn Rand references omitted for brevity only! ; ) ] In any case, your own experience or mine is just as valid as anyone else's. The problems in communication only arise when we skip over that part and insist on trying to drive a cubical spike into a circular receptacle with a jackhammer. It not only doesn't work, it tends to annoy to the neighbors and destroy both the spike and the receptacle in the process. Serena www.freeboards.net/index.php?mforum=sickgovernmentb __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 2005 Report Share Posted July 31, 2005 Serena, Well said. I also like your: > ...trying to drive a cubical spike into a > circular receptacle with a jackhammer. My favorite is the only thing that fits in a pigeon hole is a pigeon. Carl Grimes Healthy Habitats LLC ----- > Kathy - > > I understand about being concerned for others in the environment that > got you sick. But to some degree, we probably have to realize that we > are the coalmine canaries. In my situation, I was the first to get > sick - days before anyone else. Of those still living (two of the > former building occupants are dead, and another is dying at last > report), I am the only one still not sufficiently recovered to be > working. The majority suffered what appear to be respiratory problems > rather than CFS. > > My understanding at this point is that the sensitization is a > progressive thing. I had been exposed years earlier, and had already > been sick from it for a couple of years. The first time, I got better > with time and distance (and meds that masked the symptoms). This time, > I just couldn't do it. Of course, that marks me as a probable > malingerer in the employer's eyes, right? > > Based on various things I have read and personal stories I have heard, > I have an idea that some people will detox slowly on their own over a > period of time and become functional again. As my local doc put it - > you have to think about total toxin load as well as mycotoxins and > individual vulnerabilities and exposures. Shoemaker can test for the > genetic vulnerability - but that alone does not describe everything > that happens. A lesser exposure in a healthier person not carrying a > major toxin load (or a male - they don't get this stuff nearly as > often) is simply not going to be the same thing as what happens to a > vulnerable person already sensitized and already carrying an existing > toxin load - which is highly likely, given the vulnerability and lack > of available treatment for the vast majority of us. At some point, you > hit the limit of what that particular body can withstand. You hit it. > I hit it. All hell breaks loose, and it's never precisely the same in > any two people, nor even in > a single person all day, every day. Other people seem to do ok with > lesser measures such as avoidance techniques alone. For those who > can't detox well enough to regain their health, all the avoidance in > the world won't get it done. The poisons remain, endlessly > recirculating inside the body and doing their damage. Until those are > addressed, things won't get better. > > I take from this the thought that, the minute you hear a blanket > statement about mold, mycotoxins, how to deal with them, or how they > affect everyone (or on any other subject, for that matter!) - that is > the time to stop and think about what you're hearing, because that's > an agenda - not an experience. Shoemaker and the guys like him didn't > arrive at their present learning by generalizing first and getting > specific later. The did the opposite - listened to individual > experiences, and eventually assimilated that into an understanding of > the whole, which could in turn be used to benefit the individual. Good > analytical work always operates in both directions. You work from the > specifics to the broader picture and back to the specifics again. > Systems are like that - whether they are buildings or bodies or > patterns of illness. Caring for and about mold victims is the same. > There may be broader " rules " and issues, but they only work insofar as > they serve the specific victim. And when they > don't, you have to re-check the original premise - or at least the > speaker's agenda. [The obvious Ayn Rand references omitted for > brevity only! ; ) ] > > In any case, your own experience or mine is just as valid as anyone > else's. The problems in communication only arise when we skip over > that part and insist on trying to drive a cubical spike into a > circular receptacle with a jackhammer. It not only doesn't work, it > tends to annoy to the neighbors and destroy both the spike and the > receptacle in the process. > > > > Serena > www.freeboards.net/index.php?mforum=sickgovernmentb > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 1, 2005 Report Share Posted August 1, 2005 .. You can also try Dr. Shoemaker's book Lose the Weight You Hate. Available through his office (41.957.1550) or Amazon.com. May help you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 1, 2005 Report Share Posted August 1, 2005 > a single person all day, every day. Other people seem to do ok with lesser measures such as avoidance techniques alone. For those who can't detox well enough to regain their health, all the avoidance in the world won't get it done. The poisons remain, endlessly recirculating inside the body and doing their damage. Until those are addressed, things won't get better. -Serena > Serena, until the inflammatory response is modulated, the ionophore toxins aren't released to be adsorbed by CSM. Avoidance techniques represent the more extreme measure to damp down the cytokines and induce Leptin Signalling for detox. Restructuring ones life around avoidance might be thought of as a the greater inconvenience than the approach of taking Actos, CSM and associated therapies. Avoidance is a protocol that is resorted to when all other means have failed to get the job done, or if relevant treatment is inaccessible to the mold victim. Dr. Shoemaker saw the results of my test, and then duplicated the experiment. Dr Shoemaker saw fit to include this experience in his book. It remains to be seen how this situation applies to others or if anyone even feels that they wish to go to the trouble that we did. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 1, 2005 Report Share Posted August 1, 2005 SERENA EDWARDS Shoemaker understands this. That may be why he didn't write, " 's way is the only way, " any more than he's ever going to write, " Serena's experience is more valid than anyone else's. " There simply is no one-size-fits-all solution, and no acceptable casualty rate. Following that kind of thinking is what gets little kids shot up with thimerosol by the millions. > Serena, So if someone approaches you about " avoidance " , the advice you will give them is " there is no one size-fits-all-solution " ? There are a lot of people out there who cannot find a doctor who will even believe them, let alone help them with any Shoemaker style treatments. It seems fairly reasonable that a person lacking other options might think about undertaking a strategy to avoid the offending substance. Do you think Dr Shoemaker would include and my story if we were trying to talk people out of doing his protocols and saying " 's way is the only way " ? I can't recall that we ever made any such assertions, nor have we tried to talk people into living outdoors. We just got tired of no help from doctors and feeling like crap. We decided to do something about it, and talked about the results. Following your kind of thinking would still have us begging stubborn doctors for help instead of out hiking and mountain climbing. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 2, 2005 Report Share Posted August 2, 2005 SERENA EDWARDS wrote: > , for the last time, WHY must eveything turn into a debate with you? Is it because your way IS the highway? Never mind. Purely rhetorical. > Well, it's mostly because you are disseminating incorrect information regarding my experience and views. For example, after years of posting on this list that I am primarily concerned with the detection and avoidance of mycotoxins, you said that my approach was fine for allergies - but told us nothing about toxin exposure. It's as if you were either talking about someone else or never read Mold Warriors or any of my posts. And then your tendency to discount avoidance techniques removes one of the few options remaining to people who cannot gain access to other treatments. Drugs would never be my primary choice if natural means can offer a realistic means of dealing with the problem and improving ones situation. Also there is this suggestion that my strategy consists of " living outdoors " . While I have made statements about doing a test in a pristine environment to establish a baseline of " as good as it gets " and that feeling good in a tent is preferable to feeling like crap in a castle, living outdoors is not what I am doing. And as I've also said, by reducing my overall exposure, I am working in a place that was formerly intolerable. I haven't asked anybody to leave their moldy houses, as this is purely a personal choice. I've only stated that if remediation is not effective and you are getting worse, that you can probably expect that trend to continue unabated. I have also consistently maintained that the individual response is so variable that no standards can be developed which can possibly address the needs of those with such variable degrees of reactivity. Your assertion that I have proposed a " one size fits all " approach is not based on anything I ever said and completely inconsistent with the facts. But I will say that if someone identifies a substance they are reacting to, avoidance of that substance probably IS an approach that will most consistently provide the benefits of not having a reaction and might even be considered " one size fits all " To prevent further debates, please ensure that any statements or concepts attributed to me are consistent with something that I might actually say. Thank you. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.