Re: Re: CLOROX MEDICAL RESEARCHER DISCREDITS CLOROX

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 8/2/2005 7:57:05 PM Pacific Standard Time,

erikmoldwarrior@... writes:

Yes. The unfortunate part is many of them they really believe in

what they are doing and have themselves convinced that they

are " good " and caring doctors.

I disagree to this statement as being accurate in many instance. When I

first became ill, I was within the UCSD Health Care System. There is a

DEFINATE

tone of " if I step outside the box, my .....is on the line. " These boys know

the hand that feeds them. Hypocratic oath in many instances is in realty

Hypocritic Oath. I actually had one allergist from UCSD explain

hypersensitivity pneuomonitis to me. Acknowledge my symptons as HP and then

have the gaul

to say he could not run tests for it. DIRECT QUOTE " It's just not something

UCSD does. "

They don't listen to the extended descriptions of sufferers that go

far beyond the " allergy " concept and are indicativee of a long term

accumulations of ionophore neurotoxins as a dysregulator of immune

response.

Yea they do. They are simply intimidated by the potential loss of funding.

And it is unfortunate that by acclaiming those more enlightened

physicians who have become " mold doctors " merely because they

believe and affirm your illness, but who misinterprete the etiology

is actually supporting the views of mold denialists who maintain the

position that if mold illness is truly an allergy, then any

complaints that go beyond the known characteristics of allergic

responses must be somatization or wild exaggerations.

How much money do you think Allergists are making in the courtroom denying

the more serious illnesses of fungal exposure? Besides being given funding

for research grants by stakeholder industries, the dollar amount for being an

" expert " witness denying these illnesses is perversely obscene. In the Kilian

case of Arizona, Dr. Saxon, co-author of the ACOEM Mold Statement,

was paid close to $70,000 to say Ms. Kilian's tremors were psychological in

origin. Saxon is an ALLERGIST. He is not even quailified to testify of

psychological disorders.

Even sympathetic allergists and toxicologists must be made aware of

Dr Shoemakers concepts for their support to be truly effective.

True. And is also true, there are treatments from both a toxicological and

an immunological aspect that we, as ones who have been excessively exposed to

mold, respond to. If I, as a Realtor, can understand this concept, then why

can't those who are supposedly medically trained understand it? Answer: The

enticement of Money and the intimidation of Retribution!!!!