# 7 WHAT THE ACOEM DOES NOT WANT YOU TO KNOW!!!!!!!!

[Guest guest]

Post # 7

Re: Okay, My Declaration is now a Legal, Public Doc

Posted by _Sharon_

(http://counsel.net/cgi-bin/chatscripts/mailform.cgi?uid=kfc1955 & dmn=sgd.uge & nam\

e=Sharon & subject=Re:+Okay,+My+Declaration+is+now+a+Legal,

+Public+Doc) on 7/09/05

Good Morning All,

Haynes vs. Adair Homes, Case No. CCV0211573, Testimony of Bruce J Kelman

(K), February 18, 2005. Attorney for the Haynes, Mr. Vance(V)Page 45, Line

12

V: Thank you. And, you mentioned -- -- what I have heard

(whenever one sees >>>> that means the post got cut off, or hijacked to

another post)

>>>> is " a lot " but I do not really know.

>>>>

>>>> Read the doctor's statement for yourself at:

>>>>

>>>> http://www.ehw.org/Healthy_House/HH_Toxic_Mold.htm

>>>>

Post # 8

Re: Okay, My Declaration is now a Legal, Public Doc

Posted by _Sharon_

(http://counsel.net/cgi-bin/chatscripts/mailform.cgi?uid=kfc1955 & dmn=sgd.uge & nam\

e=Sharon & subject=Re:+Okay,+My+Declaration+is+now+a+Legal,

+Public+Doc) on 7/09/05

Hey ,

Don't know anything about Title 31. I just want them to stop killing people

for money's sake.My last post got cut off. Will try again.

Haynes vs. Adair Homes, Case No. CCV0211573. Testimony Bruce J. Kelman (K)

Mr. Vance is the Haynes' family attorney. (V) Pg.45, Line 12

V: Thank you. And, you mentioned-- -- what I have heard

(there it is again!)

>>>>> is " a lot " but I do not really know.

>>>>>

>>>>> Read the doctor's statement for yourself at:

>>>>>

>>>>> _http://www.ehw.org/Healthy_House/HH_Toxic_Mold.htm_

(http://www.ehw.org/Healthy_House/HH_Toxic_Mold.htm)

******************************************************************Post # 9

Re: Okay, My Declaration is now a Legal, Public Doc

Posted by _Sharon _

(http://counsel.net/cgi-bin/chatscripts/mailform.cgi?uid=kfc1955 & dmn=sgd.uge & nam\

e=Sharon+ & subject=Re:+Okay,+My+Declaration+is+now+a+Lega

l,+Public+Doc) on 7/09/05

http://www.ehw.org/Healthy_House/HH_Toxic_Mold.htm Sickening. Posts hyjacked

to prior site. Dearborn/CDC/Congressional Mold Work Group. Orwell, 1984.

******************************************************************

Post # 10

On 7/09/05, Sharon wrote:

> Well aparently I am being edited and am no longer free to quote from a

public,

> legal document of this board. Go figure!

> Sharon

Post # 11

Post: Hmmmmm.....

Posted by D on 7/09/05

Hey ,

Don't know anything about Title 31. I just want them to

stop killing people in order to save money. My last post

got cut off. Will try again.

Haynes vs. Adair Homes, Case No. CCV0211573. Testimony

Bruce J. Kelman (K) Mr. Vance is the Haynes' family

attorney. (V) Pg.45, Line 12

V: Thank you. And, you mentioned--what was it the American

Congress of Occupational and Environmental Medicine?

K: No. It's the American College of Occupational and Environmental

Medicine.

V: American College. Now, this isn't a university, is it?

K: No. This is a professional college.

V: Well, it;s more of a trade association, isn't it? It's a group, it's an

association of doctors and people that study certain things?

K: No. Actually, it's a learned body. So, calling it a trade association is

ridiculous.

V: Well, I just went to the website and they call themselves an association.

And, that' why--and you can go to their website and you can look them up and

you can see (inaudible) there an association, correct?

K: Well, they are an association. There's lots of different associations.

V: Well, I understand that, but I'm talking about this particular college.

It's not a university--.

K: You used the word trade association. It's not a trade association.

V: --it's not a university and it's not an educational institution. It's

more of a group of people.

K: It's certainly a learned body, yes.

V: Well, and I'm not arguing with you, sir. I'm just saying it's a group of

people rather than an educational institution...

From my Declaration:

39. ...Research showed that a Seminar was given in May of

2002, a full five months prior to the ACOEM Board of

Directors' acceptance of the ACOEM Statement that

established the medical policy-writing body's position on

illnesses caused by mold in an indoor environment...

40. This Atlantic Legal Foundation paper documents some of

those who are nationally known expert defense witnesses,

presenting at the seminar on the subject together. The

Seminar was sponsored by ICTM, International Center for

Toxicology and Medicine. Dr. Ron Gots (Gots) is the

principal in ICTM. It was a small group of presenters, some

of whom were Dr. Bardana, (Bardana; Dr. Lees-Haley (Lees-

Haley); Gots and GlobalTox principals, Kelman and Robbins.

41. Background information regarding some of Kelman's co-

presenters, attached hereto as Exhibit 24 is evidence of

Gots being investigated by Dateline NBC for insurance

injury claim denials. Attached as Exhibit 25 is a true and

correct copy of a newspaper article from a case in Oregon

regarding denial of mold related worker's comp claims of

teachers and centering on the involvement of Bardana.

Attached as Exhibit 26 is a true and correct copy of a

published, peer reviewed abstract denouncing Lees-Haley's

system of diagnosing malingerers as unscientifically skewed

toward a finding of malingering. Also attached as Exhibit

27 is a true and correct copy of an email from ACOEM

member, Gots, strongly praising the ACOEM Statement.

45. Within the ACOEM Statement's background information is

another email authored by Borak, a true and correct copy of

which is attached hereto as Exhibit 29. The email was sent

September 6, 2002. The recipients were Dean Grove, Past

President of the ACOEM, Barry Eisenberg, Executive Director,

ACOEM, Tim Key, Current President of the ACOEM and

Bernacki, Past President of the ACOEM. nne Dreger is

the Communications Director of the ACOEM.

46. In the above referenced email, Borak stated, " I have

received several sets of comments that find the current

version, much revised, to still be a defense argument. On

the other hand, Hardin and his colleauges are not

willing to further dilute the paper. " He goes on to

say, " I do not want this to go to the BOD and then be

rejected. That would be an important violation of -

I have assured him that if we do not use it he can freely

make whatever other use he might want to make. " Borak

wrote, " If we 'officially' reject it, then we turn his

efforts into garbage. "

47. This email demonstrates that it was understood by

those in the inner circle of decision makers of the ACOEM

that the conclusion to " not officially reject " an admittedly biased defense

paper would have future value to the principals of GlobalTox by providing

legitimacy to their defense argument. Borak's above refenced sentences

illustrate this future value for the principals of GlobalTox was given

consideration in the purported " unbiased " decision to accept the document as

the

ACOEM Statement.

48. By referencing the ACOEM Statement as a " defense

argument " , with biased consideration being given to it's

known expert defense witness authors, indicates that the

inner circle of the ACOEM was well aware that the future

value of legitimizing this work would be it's use in the

Courts to win lawsuits against families, office workers,

teachers and children who have been made sick after an

excessive exposure to mold.

51. In the Haynes case, Kelman describes a peer review

process as, " ..Peer review means that the person who

reviewed the article has no relationship to the person who

wrote it. The person who wrote it doesn't know whose doing

the reviewing. That's really important, because otherwise

the reviewers don't feel free to severely criticize the

article. I mean, I'm not gonna criticize my friend's

article, particularly if I know that he knows that I review

it... "

54...Attached as Exhibit 35 is a true and correct copy of an

email authored by Swift (Swift) and sent on October

4, 2002. Swift asked the question of Borak, " I'm giving a

talk to a group of insurance related clients. Is it

quotable and if so, how should I reference it? "