# 6 WHAT THE ACOEM DOES NOT WANT YOU TO KNOW!!!!!!!

[Guest guest]

Post # 6

Re: Okay, My Declaration is now a Legal, Public Doc

Posted by _Sharon_

(http://counsel.net/cgi-bin/chatscripts/mailform.cgi?uid=kfc1955 & dmn=sgd.uge & nam\

e=Sharon & subject=Re:+Okay,+My+Declaration+is+now+a+Legal,

+Public+Doc) on 7/08/05

Hey All,

Getting ready to go out to dinner with friends, but thought I would

share one more portion of my Declaration from the suit that GlobalTox

and Kelman sued me for stating he " altered his under oath testimony " .

17. The ACOEM Statement has been cleverly worded to imply to those

without in-depth knowledge of the matter, including physicians, that

there is no evidence of prior healthy people becoming ill from mold

exposure. The catch phrase conclusion sentence that is used over and

over again, states, " Current scientific evidence does not support the

proposition that human health has been adversely affected by inhaled

mycotoxins in homes, schools and office environments. "

18. The calculated marketing spins of this one little sentence have

had trememdous negative impacts on our society. The sentence has been

used to deny legitimate illness, misguide mold remediation efforts,

stifle medical understanding and win court cases based on irrelevant,

yet accepted information. It has been parlayed as a mantra by the

Manhattan Institute, the US Chamber of Commerce and their affiliate

stakeholder industries for the purpose of limiting financial liability.

19. By using the word " mycotoxins " instead of the word " mold " , and

strategically placing it as the final sentence, Final Word, it

accomplished the insideious goal of the intended implication: mold does

not make one sick.

20. By differentiating homes, schools, and offices from all other

environments, under the guise of conclusive dose response rat studies,

it eliminated all significance of vast medical research that was known

about fungal diseases. It established that all prior research of

illness caused by fungi would only apply to everywhere else on the

entire planet except homes, schools, and offices.

21. An example of how this differentiation in environments is misused

would be: A farmer and a teacher could both exhibit the exact same

serious neurological and cognitive dysfunctions indicative of Type III

hypersensitivity or toxicosis after an abnormal exposure to mold and/or

toxins. The farmer would be treated with antifungal and/or toxin

eliminating measures. The teacher would be labeled unstable and would

be mistreated with antidepressants. Attached hereto as Exhibit 9 is a

true and correct copy of a national defense law firm, Gordon and Rees'

interpretation of how to use the ACOEM Statement in court to defeat

legitmate mold injuries. Attached as Exhibit 10 is a true and correct

copy of a definition from the Encyclopedia Britannica of Type III

hypersensitivity (farmer's lung).

74. My degree is in marketing. I have been professionally and

corporately trained in marketing and sales. I have 25 years of

experience in marketing and sales. As such and if called to witness, I

am qualified to state, that in my opinion: The ACOEM Statement and the

Manhattan Institute Version, both authored by Kelman/GlobalTox, are

nothing more than the core and the vehicle of an elaborate and

injurious marketing campaign designed to deceive the American public.

Sharon Kramer