Guest guest Posted July 18, 2005 Report Share Posted July 18, 2005 June 03, 2005 MICHIGAN JURY RETURNS $925,000 AWARD FOR PLAINTIFF IN TOXIC-MOLD SUIT In a press release, plaintiff's lawyers have announced their firm has obtained a $925,000 verdict on behalf of a Michigan apartment renter who suffered severe asthma attacks as a result of her exposure to toxic mold. The jury hearing the case received evidence that there was ongoing water leakage in the apartment, with mold persisting on walls and ceilings. The evidence apparently indicated that the situation was aggravated by the landlord's cavalier attitude in dealing with the renter's complaints. Recent scientific commentary has, rightly or wrongly, questioned whether mold causes debilitating disease. Even such commentary, however, has generally acknowledged that exposure to certain types of mold can cause allergic reactions, including asthma. This Michigan case is interesting, because the case suggests that a plaintiff can mount a successful claim based on the presence of an allergic reaction without wading into the more muddled science surrounding allegedly mold-caused debilitating diseases. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2005 Report Share Posted July 18, 2005 No, I don't. But I believe if you go back through the Sickbuildings archives, it's in there. Sometime in late May. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2005 Report Share Posted July 18, 2005 Thank you for sharing this information. Do you happen to know in which City this case took place, and/or the name of the plaintiff or the plaintiff's lawyers? Barb E --- snk1955@... wrote: > > June 03, 2005 > > MICHIGAN JURY RETURNS $925,000 AWARD FOR PLAINTIFF > IN TOXIC-MOLD SUIT > > > In a press release, plaintiff's lawyers have > announced their firm has > obtained a $925,000 verdict on behalf of a Michigan > apartment renter who suffered > severe asthma attacks as a result of her exposure to > toxic mold. > The jury hearing the case received evidence that > there was ongoing water > leakage in the apartment, with mold persisting on > walls and ceilings. The > evidence apparently indicated that the situation was > aggravated by the landlord's > cavalier attitude in dealing with the renter's > complaints. > Recent scientific commentary has, rightly or > wrongly, questioned whether > mold causes debilitating disease. Even such > commentary, however, has generally > acknowledged that exposure to certain types of mold > can cause allergic > reactions, including asthma. > This Michigan case is interesting, because the case > suggests that a > plaintiff can mount a successful claim based on the > presence of an allergic reaction > without wading into the more muddled science > surrounding allegedly > mold-caused debilitating diseases. > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.