Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

CDC,EPA,Department of Health .......Interview

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

FEMA Announcements Last Updated: Sep 29th, 2005 - 07:29:19

http://communitydispatch.com/artman/publish/article_2249.shtml

Update on Health Issues Related to Mold, Mildew and Mud in Hurricane

and Flood Affected Areas

By Center for Disease Control and Prevention

Sep 29, 2005, 07:08

Wednesday, September 28, 2005

MR. SKINNER: Thank you, , and thank you all for joining us

today for this important call.

There continues to be a lot of interest, and rightly so, about the

potential health concerns for people in areas that have been

impacted by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. One particular concern that

continues to be gathering a lot of attention are the potential

health effects to mold and mildew, and so we decided to pull this

media briefing together.

With us today is Dr. Redd from the Centers for Disease

Control and Prevention, Mr. from the Environmental

Protection Agency, and Mr. Fred Cerise, the secretary of the

Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals.

What we'll do is have each one of them provide two or three minutes

of opening remarks and then we'll open it up for question and answer.

And let me remind everyone on the call that we do have someone from

the state of Louisiana, you know, Mr. Fred, Dr. Fred Cerise on the

line, but much of what we're going to be talking about is also

applicable to the other areas that have been impacted by these

hurricanes in Mississippi and Alabama and parts of Texas as well.

So we hope you are able to get some useful information from this

call and with that, I'd like to begin by having Dr. Steve Redd

provide some opening remarks.

DR. REDD: Thanks, Tom.

I want to just reiterate a couple of the things that you mentioned,

that mold exposure is just one of the hazards or potential hazards

that people are going to be exposed to as they return to their homes

and start their lives in the aftermath of these hurricanes.

The mold issue is something that will affect the entire Gulf Coast

region but is going to be a particular problem in New Orleans

because of the flooding that's occurred there and the duration of

the flooding.

What I would like to do in my remarks here is go over briefly just a

little bit about what mold is, what the health effects are, and then

our recommendations for cleanup and protection from mold exposure.

So molds are a class of organisms that is separate from plants and

animals. They have some characteristics of both of those but they

live on organic material and the thing that--they're present

everywhere. The thing that kind a keeps them in check in indoor

environments normally is the limitation of moisture.

They require a nutrient source, the right temperature and water, and

normally, there's not enough water present to promote their growth.

As we know, both from wind and rain damage, and then from flooding

as well, the conditions for mold growth in the Gulf Coast region in

many buildings is really optimal now.

The health effects of mold--the second thing I'm going to talk about-

-there are really three major categories.

The first is infection and that is particularly a problem in people

that have suppressed immune systems. Either they're taking medicines

that prevent their immune systems from fighting infection normally,

or they have illnesses that suppress their immune system.

The second general category is allergy and this is for people who

have allergies to particular molds. If they're re-exposed to those

molds, they'll have symptoms like hay fever or skin rash or

worsening of asthma.

The third category is that of toxin-mediated disease. Some molds are

capable of producing toxins. They won't produce these toxins at all

times but under certain circumstances, like the nutrient supply is

getting short or some environmental issue, they may start producing

toxins and those can be dangerous if they're eaten or if they're

touched.

There's up to now not been evidence that airborne mold toxins have

produced disease.

Now the next category is talking about what to do to get rid of

mold. The thing that we say under normal circumstances is you have

to identify the water source. In this case that is no mystery but

once the water source is addressed and further water intrusion is

stopped, the surfaces that are mold-contaminated, that can be

cleaned need to be cleaned, and those that can't be cleaned need to

be removed, and we do not recommend testing or sampling for mold.

We believe that if mold is present, it needs to be removed, and the

real distinction is the amount of mold that is present.

So for small amounts of mold, those can be taken care of by the

property owner. Larger amounts, and usually we use a rough yardstick

of ten square feet of mold, that that needs to be taken care of by

professionals who have more experience with the kinds of personal

protection measures that need to be put in place to prevent exposure.

That leads us, actually, to the third or the final category I was

going to talk about, which is how to prevent mold exposure.

We recommend that people who are susceptible, that's people with

suppressed immune systems, or allergies, that they avoid areas with

mold.

For people who don't have those conditions, we recommend, for the

normal person who's just entering a building, we're not recommending

any specific protection, but if they're doing things that would

cause them to be exposed to airborne mold, such as remediating,

taking down walls, stirring up dust, we do recommend respiratory

protection and that generally means an N95 mask.

These are the kinds of things that can be purchased at normal home

supply stores, and I'd like to mention, finally, that all the work

we're doing is being done in close coordination with health

departments of Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Texas, and federal

partners such as EPA, and that one of the really critical things

here is that this information about what kind of protection to use,

in what situation, is available on our Web site.

There are fact sheets and we're working to get that information to

the people who may be entering these kind of environments, so that

they can protect themselves.

MR. SKINNER: Okay. Thanks, Dr. Redd.

Now I'm going to introduce Mr. from the EPA who's

going to talk about this from the EPA's perspective.

Mr. .

MR. JOHNSON: Yes, thank you. Do I need to touch star one?

MR. SKINNER: No; you're on; go ahead.

MR. JOHNSON: Yeah, I would want to start by again echoing what Dr.

Redd just mentioned which is EPA and CDC have had a very close

partnership on the emerging mold issue over the last several years

and we have benefited greatly by their leadership on this issue and

tried to complement some of their public materials with some of ours.

I think you know that EPA's Indoor Environments Program is a

voluntary one and we spend a lot of time trying to get useful

information out to people on mold, and EPA's Website

www.epa.gov/mold is where we try to send our messages out to the

public so that they can take appropriate action regarding mold.

I want to just amplify briefly on just a couple of issues that Dr.

Redd spoke about. The first one has to do with cleanup and just

again echoing a couple of things. First of all, across the hurricane-

affected areas I think we're going to see a wide range of conditions

and there are going to be homes that have possibly been without air

conditioning for a few days, have a small amount of water

infiltration from damage possibly, and I think much of our

conventional guidance on mold applies directly and people can deal

with the problem without much difficulty at all.

In other cases where water infiltration has been much more

significant, much more lengthy, I think we all understand the grave

circumstances in New Orleans with the flooding, mold problems are

going to be much more severe. So we're dealing with a wide range of

potential cleanup scenarios across the affected area and it's not

going to be a one size fits all.

Again, I think the main point on the cleanup as Dr. Redd mentioned

is to first remove the water of the moisture source which may be a

challenge in and of itself, and then to remove the mold. And

removing the mold, the allergenic agent, is critical, so that's

essentially the steps there.

I want to talk a minute about a very substantial issue that I think

many people will face and that has to do with sampling and

contractors that are involved in mold remediation. The concern with

sampling is that in many cases sampling can be useful, it has a

defined purpose, and in many cases sampling for mold, testing for

mold, determining what mold levels are, is simply essentially a

financial diversion away from treating what the real problem is. So

we encourage people to make sure that when they are approached to

engage in some sampling to really understand why the sampling is

being recommended and to really understand the purpose of it.

Related to that is many people in the Gulf Coast region are going to

be faced with having to seek professional help to deal with their

mold problems and there are many excellent contractors out there and

we encourage folks that when they are faced with seeking

professional help that they do some pretty common-sense things like

check references, certainly look for experience, and it's our

experience that individuals with fire damage and water restoration

experience tend to be very good in the mold remediation area.

Lastly, pay close attention to contractors whose immediate

suggestion is to do extensive testing, as I said before.

So with that I think I'll stop and turn it back over to the

moderator.

MR. SKINNER: Thanks, Mr. . Now I'm going to ask Dr. Fred

Cerise to speak for 2 or 3 minutes and certainly give us a local

perspective on the situation. Dr. Cerise?

DR. CERISE: Thank you. Good morning. As you know or are maybe aware,

the city officials in New Orleans are moving forward with plans.

They're trying to rehabilitate the city and people are coming back

into the city, particularly workers, but also business owners to

gather important information and things like that in order to keep

their businesses going. So yesterday there was a part of the city

that was repopulated on the West Bank of the river which was

generally a dry area, but in the coming days and weeks there will

periods where people are allowed back in to view their homes on the

East Bank of the river which is one of the more affected areas by

the water.

So certainly in addition to the mold and the extensive discussion

we've had on that, we've got other issues that we're paying close

attention to particularly from a public health standpoint, these

issues of clean drinking water and sewage systems which just doesn't

exist at this time on the East Bank of the river which is a major

area of Orleans.

So we're advising people that do come into the city whether these

are essential workers or people who are coming in for the day to

inspect a home or business that there are other risks associated

with coming back into the city and that has to do with the water

that is not suitable for drinking, people can be exposed to

bacterial contamination that could cause diarrheal illnesses.

The East Bank of Orleans is still under a boil advisory meaning that

there's potentially harmful bacteria still in the water supply and

could be ingested not only from drinking the water but also if it's

used to bathe or cook or brush teeth or wash hands or things like

that. So we're asking people to pay close attention to that.

We're also working with the businesses that are up in the area

because we do have restaurants that are supplying the food to the

workers and so we are making sure that they have sources of clean

water and they have proper hand washing and following techniques,

using disposable plates and things like that so that we're not

contaminating the workers.

We are making very prominent placards at these places from the

Health Department saying that they have been cleared to try to,

again, do as much as we can to educate the general public about the

safety.

So in addition to the issues of mold we have issues with drinking

water and sewage, and also a concern of people that would come back

and attempt to stay in the city at this time. We have other things

like hospitals. We don't have operational hospitals in the city at

this time. The 911 system is not operational. Major trauma care is

not readily available in the and there's a lot of cleanup going on

in the area with broken glass and things like that that you can

imagine. So we've got a number of concerns. We're working closely

with the city on addressing those things as, again, obviously people

are very anxious to get back into the city and get back into their

homes.

MR. SKINNER: Thanks, Dr. Cerise. With that, , I'd like to turn

it back over to you. We'll begin the question and answer, and

depending on how many reporters we have in queue, let's just allow

one question at this time. So we're ready to begin.

OPERATOR: Thank you, and at this time, if you would like to ask a

question, please press star followed by one on your touchtone phone.

To withdraw your request, you may press star two. Once again, to ask

a question please press star followed by one.

Our first question comes from Pope with the Times Picayune.

QUESTION: Good afternoon. Greetings from ground zero. I'm calling

because I've been hearing from colleagues and friends with children,

that they are anxious about moving back into New Orleans with their

children for fear of contamination, possible long-term health damage

to their children from stuff that may have been in the water, that

is blown around as the water dries.

What can you say to address those concerns? And please identify

yourself because I'm not sure which is who.

MR. SKINNER: Yeah. , it sounds to me like you're asking about

sediments and what are some of the possible health effects

associated with sediments and that sort of thing?

QUESTION: Yes. The whole [inaudible]; yes.

MR. SKINNER: Okay. I'll ask Mr. , do you want to try to take

a stab at that question, sir?

MR. JOHNSON: Sure. I can speak to it. I can speak to it a bit. Yes,

we, EPA has in close partnership with the state of Louisiana, we

have implemented a fairly extensive sampling program that is

focusing both on the floodwaters, on the sediment, and on the air

quality, and we are looking at a variety of potential contaminants,

including organic compounds, metals, CCBs. We're looking at fecal

coliform in the sediment in water, and petroleum hydrocarbons, and

the like.

And so I think, as you're able to see on our Web site, we are

evaluating that information and trying to provide, in partnership

with CDC, health advisories, and we have issued some health

advisories to focus on people limiting their contact with the

sediment, limiting their contact with the floodwater, and that's

what we've been up to.

MR. SKINNER: And Dr. Redd or Dr. Cerise, if you all have anything to

add, feel free to do that.

, let's go to the next question, please.

OPERATOR: Thank you. Our next question comes from Maggie Fox with

Reuters.

MS. FOX: Thanks. I'd like to expand on that because I think what

was asking was about whether this stuff's blowing around and in

the air, and my question expands on that, because when I left New

Orleans and went to Houston, I heard some amazing rumors from my

college-age niece, such as that the evacuees were carrying these

contaminants on their bodies, and that they could breathe mold

spores on to you. There's a lot of fear about that.

What can be done and what concerns do you have about some of these

fears that may or may not be founded in fact?

MR. SKINNER: Dr. Redd, do you want to take a crack at that question?

DR. REDD: Sure. I think from the mold standpoint, the specific thing

that you mentioned, that's not possible. Actually, the kinds of

effects that molds can cause, all the ones I mentioned would not be

communicable.

That the illnesses that people get are from direct exposure from the

environment and I think there's a chance that a mold spore could be

on--you know, a person could carry that from Louisiana to Texas but

I think that the number of spores and there's really not a

possibility of a health effect occurring from that kind of

transportation or a person actually carrying something on their body

for any distance, really. That I think that really shouldn't be a

concern.

might want to talk about the other exposure. I think it's

probably pretty much the same case, that there are environmental

exposures that expose the person but they're not generally going to

create a risk from that person transferring it to someone else.

MR. SKINNER: Mr. , do you want to add anything?

MR. JOHNSON: Sure. I can add something very briefly, and again, I

would direct you to EPA's Katrina Web site, and, in particular, the

air data. Within the last couple of days, we have posted some

additional air data which outlines the kind of monitoring we did pre-

Rita in the New Orleans area, to examine the particular issue of

windblown dust. At this point in time, we have had a number of

monitors out, in and around the city, in St. Bernard Parish, to look

at the particulate matter levels, and we have found at certain

locations, on certain days, that for unusually sensitive people, the

levels--we found some levels that would be of concern to them, and

we've also found somewhat higher levels in the unhealthy for

sensitive groups range.

These are all part of EPA's air quality index and it's reported

pretty explicitly on our Web page. So, in summary, EPA's very

concerned about the windblown dust. We are working hard with the

state to get the ambient air quality network reestablished following

the hurricane and we expect to be doing additional sampling in the

coming days and weeks.

MR. SKINNER: Thanks, Mr. . , next question, please.

OPERATOR: Thank you. Todd Zwillich with WebMD, your line is now open.

MR. ZWILLICH: Hi. Thanks for having us on. This doesn't count as a

question, Tom.

Just to recap, when you said you found unusually--you found some

levels that could be of concern to some people, you meant dust and

not mold; right? You were referring specifically to dust?

MR. JOHNSON: Yes. This is from the Environmental

Protection Agency. I was referring explicitly to particulate matter

measurement.

MR. SKINNER: Go ahead with your question.

QUESTION: Just a couple of quick examples of diseases that can be

caused by toxin exposure in a mold.

MR. SKINNER: Dr. Redd?

DR. REDD: Yes. Well, ingestion of grains or foods that contain

mycotoxins can, over the long term, lead to liver cancer. If high

doses are ingested over a short period of time, they can lead to

liver failure. I think these are not the kinds of problems we're

likely to see. It's really a situation where foods are stored in

moist conditions and mold grows and produces toxins, but those are,

those would be two examples.

MR. SKINNER: Next question, please.

OPERATOR: Thank you. Our next question comes from Miriam Falco with

CNN.

MS. FALCO: Hi. Thanks for taking these calls. For one thing, could

you clarify what the symptoms are, what the illnesses are. I might

have missed that. But my question is you've mentioned a couple of

times, that the EPA has done extensive testing, and you made a point

of explaining what home owners should look for when they're trying

to hire contractors.

It strikes me odd that in a conference call like this you're

pointing that out, which leads me to want to ask: Are you seeing

scams already? Are you--it sounds more like a consumer alert rather

than a medical alert. So what was the impetus for this type of

consumer advice?

MR. SKINNER: Mr. , do you want to take that and then we'll

ask Dr. Redd to elaborate a little bit more on the symptoms.

MR. JOHNSON: Yeah; absolutely. Well, mold is not a new issue and

it's been our experience over the last several years, that while

there are some excellent contractors out there, we feel that there

are also some contractors out there who have diverted people's

financial resources away from actually remedying the problem, and

have, you know, had them do things that we do not believe are

normally critical to fixing the mold problem.

And, for example, while EPA has not done, and has no plans to do

testing for mold in homes, that often is a path of first suggestion

by some, and our advice is, to the consumer is simply if you're

going to be doing testing, know why you're doing it, because it

oftentimes requires many samples, it's oftentimes difficult to

interpret, there are no standards for mold levels that you can

compare them against, and it's simply often a diversion of resources.

MR. SKINNER: Dr. Redd?

DR. REDD: Yes. The types of illnesses that you would see, for people

that have an infection, that could be pneumonia that would have a

cough and fever associated with it. It could be a fungal sinusitis

which would be pain in the sinuses, fever. For the allergy symptoms,

that would be runny nose, itchy red eyes, and that would be kind of

the hay fever complex.

Or for people with asthma, that are sensitive to mold and that are

exposed to mold, that could be shortness of breath, chest

tightening, problems with breathing, just the typical asthma

worsening type symptoms.

MR. SKINNER: Great; thank you. , next question, please.

OPERATOR: Thank you. Our next question comes from Mike Stobbe with

the Associated Press.

MR. STOBBE: Hi. This question's aimed at Dr. Cerise. Doctor, you

mentioned a situation where people are moving into the west bank and

now going back to the east bank. Are you seeing increased cases of

illness and injury now as compared to, say, a week ago?

DR. CERISE: Actually, we have not seen--they're just beginning to go

back. On Monday, they were repopulating a section of the West Bank

of the river. But we're doing surveillance at the hospitals that are

up and at a number of what we call DMATs, or these units, medical

units that are spread around the city, and we're doing ongoing

surveillance at those sites and we're not seeing a spike. Mainly

what we're seeing is injuries, whether they're intentional or

unintentional, but mainly injuries or accidents from people doing

work in the area. After that we're seeing some respiratory symptoms,

coughing, colds and allergic type symptoms, and then rashes from

contact with the environment or from other purposes as well. But

we're not seeing things that people were concerned about in terms of

diarrheal illnesses. We really haven't seen spikes in that. And we

haven't seen a big spike in respiratory type symptoms since people

started coming back, but that just is a new happening just over the

past few days.

MR. SKINNER: , next question, please.

OPERATOR: Thank you. Our next question comes from Betsy McKay with

The Wall Street Journal.

MS. McKAY: Thanks. This question is for any one of you. There seems

to be some confusion about going back to sediment and what could be

airborne from the sediment. We know that when the flood waters were

still pretty prevalent there was a lot of sewage related bacteria in

them and presumably that all dries up in the sediment. But does that

bacteria or any portion of it become airborne? And then is there any

health hazard related to that?

MR. SKINNER: Mr. , do you want to take the first stab at that

one?

MR. JOHNSON: Yes, I'll take a stab at it and hopefully Steve will

follow-up as well.

We were very concerned about this possibility as we were developing

our environmental sampling plans for the water, sediment and the

air, and particularly after finding fecal coliforms in the water and

in the sediment, the next natural question is the very question that

you posed.

What we did at EPA was we got with our Office of Research and

Development and we had a series of conference calls that probably

had 20 to 30 both CDC and EPA scientists on it discussing what the

value would be of monitoring for potential biological contaminates

in the air particulate or as aerosols.

The conclusion of the entire group, and it was the consensus that I

heard, was that monitoring of biologicals in the airstream would not

really be a useful tool for helping to inform public health

decisions because there are no actionable levels, there is no

relationship between any levels that might be found in the air and

the likelihood of a public health outcome.

So for some of those reasons which the CDC is really I think in a

much better position to respond to, the decision and the advice

coming from the two agencies' scientists was that we would not

pursue that.

MR. SKINNER: Dr. Redd, do you have anything to add?

DR. REDD: Obviously I concur with that statement. I think the big

thing to recognize is that when the fecal coliforms are dried

they'll die and there won't be a risk of infection from that. There

will still be some material that will be left from that and that is

probably the most significant risk for that which I think is

probably not as significant as the allergic risk for mold that would

be some kind of irritative or allergic kind of response. And as Mr.

mentioned, there is no actionable level that you could say

this level is dangerous and below that threshold it is not dangerous.

MR. SKINNER: Thanks. , let's take a couple of more questions.

OPERATOR: Thank you. Our next question comes from from

MedPage Today.

MR. SMITH: I just want to get a sense probably from Dr. Cerise, but

if anybody wants to comment that would be good. The hospitals in New

Orleans in particular are not operating as well, although I assume

throughout the rest of the Gulf Coast things are pretty good or at

least not as bad.

If people go back into areas where there's lots of mold and start to

have symptoms, what can the health system do? Are we looking at a

lot of health symptoms that might overwhelm the facilities?

DR. CERISE: It's a good question and it's a point that we are trying

to make in terms of folks coming back into the city. Certainly for

repopulating the city one of the things that we want to make sure is

we've got the medical infrastructure to handle folks coming back and

living in the city.

Right now we have three hospitals up in the surrounding areas of

Orleans and they are not at capacity. They're able to accommodate

more at this point in time, so we haven't seen those hospitals reach

capacity. We also have a number of like I said type of emergency

room units set up around the city and to this point none of them

have been close to being overwhelmed. They are there as

precautionary measures. They're providing services.

But we feel like there's plenty of capacity at this point. And the

three hospitals, they're large hospitals that didn't go down during

the hurricane so they maintained power, they have water and sewerage

and they have a significant ability to ramp up should they need to

do that.

We also have, in fact it's arriving today or tomorrow, a large Navy

vessel, the USS Comfort, that's got 250 beds. It's primarily being

brought in for tertiary care purposes. If there's trauma or severe

problems that happen in the city proper that need immediate

attention, that vessel will be available as well.

MR. SKINNER: , let's take one final question, please.

OPERATOR: Thank you. Our final question comes from Maggie Fox with

Reuters.

MS. FOX: I just want to follow-up on the very earliest thing. If

this testing for mold isn't called for, do you just treat mold if

you happen to see it? Is that it, just eye-balling it?

MR. REDD: We recommend visual inspection and the threshold for

different actions, there really are two. One is if there's a surface

that is nonporous that can be cleaned, that would be the preferred

approach. If the contaminated material is porous, then that needs to

be removed. If it's a large area that's porous, that would call for

professional remediation.

MR. SKINNER: That was Dr. Redd from CDC.

MR. JOHNSON: This is from EPA. I would just add to that that

one of the challenges of visual inspection is often times mold

problems can actually be hidden behind wallpaper, behind wallboard

and the like, so sometimes that is a consideration as well.

MR. SKINNER: Thanks. , thank you. Thank you to all of our

participants. Thank you to the media who dialed in. Stay tuned for

further updates. We'll continue to keep you all informed as new

developments come about. Thank you again for your interest.

Listen to the telebriefing

© Communitydispatch.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the CDC's B.S. stance is that mycotoxins can only cause harm if

eaten or touched, but not breathed in. If you breathe something in,

it is touching stuff. Your much more delicate innards compared to

your skin. Skin does not have the absorbency capacity that your

throat, stomach or lungs do. This is why we put medicines in our

body usually and not on it. What a complete liar! Then the EPA guy

says don't waste your money testing the mold, just get rid of it.

Which really means when you are cleaning up your place in full body

armor and you get brain fog and chronic fatigue, etc., we don't want

you to associate that with the specific molds and the mycotoxins they

produce or we may have to tell the truth!! And that other guy, who

cares? If only these people were held accountable for their lies.

Only in government are people not accountable!!

--- In , " tigerpaw2c " <tigerpaw2c@y...>

wrote:

> FEMA Announcements Last Updated: Sep 29th, 2005 - 07:29:19

>

>

>

http://communitydispatch.com/artman/publish/article_2249.shtml

>

>

> Update on Health Issues Related to Mold, Mildew and Mud in

Hurricane

> and Flood Affected Areas

> By Center for Disease Control and Prevention

>

>

> Sep 29, 2005, 07:08

>

>

>

> Wednesday, September 28, 2005

>

> MR. SKINNER: Thank you, , and thank you all for joining us

> today for this important call.

>

> There continues to be a lot of interest, and rightly so, about the

> potential health concerns for people in areas that have been

> impacted by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. One particular concern

that

> continues to be gathering a lot of attention are the potential

> health effects to mold and mildew, and so we decided to pull this

> media briefing together.

>

> With us today is Dr. Redd from the Centers for Disease

> Control and Prevention, Mr. from the Environmental

> Protection Agency, and Mr. Fred Cerise, the secretary of the

> Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals.

>

> What we'll do is have each one of them provide two or three minutes

> of opening remarks and then we'll open it up for question and

answer.

>

> And let me remind everyone on the call that we do have someone from

> the state of Louisiana, you know, Mr. Fred, Dr. Fred Cerise on the

> line, but much of what we're going to be talking about is also

> applicable to the other areas that have been impacted by these

> hurricanes in Mississippi and Alabama and parts of Texas as well.

>

> So we hope you are able to get some useful information from this

> call and with that, I'd like to begin by having Dr. Steve Redd

> provide some opening remarks.

>

> DR. REDD: Thanks, Tom.

>

> I want to just reiterate a couple of the things that you mentioned,

> that mold exposure is just one of the hazards or potential hazards

> that people are going to be exposed to as they return to their

homes

> and start their lives in the aftermath of these hurricanes.

>

> The mold issue is something that will affect the entire Gulf Coast

> region but is going to be a particular problem in New Orleans

> because of the flooding that's occurred there and the duration of

> the flooding.

>

> What I would like to do in my remarks here is go over briefly just

a

> little bit about what mold is, what the health effects are, and

then

> our recommendations for cleanup and protection from mold exposure.

>

> So molds are a class of organisms that is separate from plants and

> animals. They have some characteristics of both of those but they

> live on organic material and the thing that--they're present

> everywhere. The thing that kind a keeps them in check in indoor

> environments normally is the limitation of moisture.

>

> They require a nutrient source, the right temperature and water,

and

> normally, there's not enough water present to promote their growth.

>

> As we know, both from wind and rain damage, and then from flooding

> as well, the conditions for mold growth in the Gulf Coast region in

> many buildings is really optimal now.

>

> The health effects of mold--the second thing I'm going to talk

about-

> -there are really three major categories.

>

> The first is infection and that is particularly a problem in people

> that have suppressed immune systems. Either they're taking

medicines

> that prevent their immune systems from fighting infection normally,

> or they have illnesses that suppress their immune system.

>

> The second general category is allergy and this is for people who

> have allergies to particular molds. If they're re-exposed to those

> molds, they'll have symptoms like hay fever or skin rash or

> worsening of asthma.

>

> The third category is that of toxin-mediated disease. Some molds

are

> capable of producing toxins. They won't produce these toxins at all

> times but under certain circumstances, like the nutrient supply is

> getting short or some environmental issue, they may start producing

> toxins and those can be dangerous if they're eaten or if they're

> touched.

>

> There's up to now not been evidence that airborne mold toxins have

> produced disease.

>

> Now the next category is talking about what to do to get rid of

> mold. The thing that we say under normal circumstances is you have

> to identify the water source. In this case that is no mystery but

> once the water source is addressed and further water intrusion is

> stopped, the surfaces that are mold-contaminated, that can be

> cleaned need to be cleaned, and those that can't be cleaned need to

> be removed, and we do not recommend testing or sampling for mold.

>

> We believe that if mold is present, it needs to be removed, and the

> real distinction is the amount of mold that is present.

>

> So for small amounts of mold, those can be taken care of by the

> property owner. Larger amounts, and usually we use a rough

yardstick

> of ten square feet of mold, that that needs to be taken care of by

> professionals who have more experience with the kinds of personal

> protection measures that need to be put in place to prevent

exposure.

>

> That leads us, actually, to the third or the final category I was

> going to talk about, which is how to prevent mold exposure.

>

> We recommend that people who are susceptible, that's people with

> suppressed immune systems, or allergies, that they avoid areas with

> mold.

>

> For people who don't have those conditions, we recommend, for the

> normal person who's just entering a building, we're not

recommending

> any specific protection, but if they're doing things that would

> cause them to be exposed to airborne mold, such as remediating,

> taking down walls, stirring up dust, we do recommend respiratory

> protection and that generally means an N95 mask.

>

> These are the kinds of things that can be purchased at normal home

> supply stores, and I'd like to mention, finally, that all the work

> we're doing is being done in close coordination with health

> departments of Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Texas, and federal

> partners such as EPA, and that one of the really critical things

> here is that this information about what kind of protection to use,

> in what situation, is available on our Web site.

>

> There are fact sheets and we're working to get that information to

> the people who may be entering these kind of environments, so that

> they can protect themselves.

>

> MR. SKINNER: Okay. Thanks, Dr. Redd.

>

> Now I'm going to introduce Mr. from the EPA who's

> going to talk about this from the EPA's perspective.

>

> Mr. .

>

> MR. JOHNSON: Yes, thank you. Do I need to touch star one?

>

> MR. SKINNER: No; you're on; go ahead.

>

> MR. JOHNSON: Yeah, I would want to start by again echoing what Dr.

> Redd just mentioned which is EPA and CDC have had a very close

> partnership on the emerging mold issue over the last several years

> and we have benefited greatly by their leadership on this issue and

> tried to complement some of their public materials with some of

ours.

>

> I think you know that EPA's Indoor Environments Program is a

> voluntary one and we spend a lot of time trying to get useful

> information out to people on mold, and EPA's Website

> www.epa.gov/mold is where we try to send our messages out to the

> public so that they can take appropriate action regarding mold.

>

> I want to just amplify briefly on just a couple of issues that Dr.

> Redd spoke about. The first one has to do with cleanup and just

> again echoing a couple of things. First of all, across the

hurricane-

> affected areas I think we're going to see a wide range of

conditions

> and there are going to be homes that have possibly been without air

> conditioning for a few days, have a small amount of water

> infiltration from damage possibly, and I think much of our

> conventional guidance on mold applies directly and people can deal

> with the problem without much difficulty at all.

>

> In other cases where water infiltration has been much more

> significant, much more lengthy, I think we all understand the grave

> circumstances in New Orleans with the flooding, mold problems are

> going to be much more severe. So we're dealing with a wide range of

> potential cleanup scenarios across the affected area and it's not

> going to be a one size fits all.

>

> Again, I think the main point on the cleanup as Dr. Redd mentioned

> is to first remove the water of the moisture source which may be a

> challenge in and of itself, and then to remove the mold. And

> removing the mold, the allergenic agent, is critical, so that's

> essentially the steps there.

>

> I want to talk a minute about a very substantial issue that I think

> many people will face and that has to do with sampling and

> contractors that are involved in mold remediation. The concern with

> sampling is that in many cases sampling can be useful, it has a

> defined purpose, and in many cases sampling for mold, testing for

> mold, determining what mold levels are, is simply essentially a

> financial diversion away from treating what the real problem is. So

> we encourage people to make sure that when they are approached to

> engage in some sampling to really understand why the sampling is

> being recommended and to really understand the purpose of it.

>

> Related to that is many people in the Gulf Coast region are going

to

> be faced with having to seek professional help to deal with their

> mold problems and there are many excellent contractors out there

and

> we encourage folks that when they are faced with seeking

> professional help that they do some pretty common-sense things like

> check references, certainly look for experience, and it's our

> experience that individuals with fire damage and water restoration

> experience tend to be very good in the mold remediation area.

>

> Lastly, pay close attention to contractors whose immediate

> suggestion is to do extensive testing, as I said before.

>

> So with that I think I'll stop and turn it back over to the

> moderator.

>

> MR. SKINNER: Thanks, Mr. . Now I'm going to ask Dr. Fred

> Cerise to speak for 2 or 3 minutes and certainly give us a local

> perspective on the situation. Dr. Cerise?

>

> DR. CERISE: Thank you. Good morning. As you know or are maybe

aware,

> the city officials in New Orleans are moving forward with plans.

> They're trying to rehabilitate the city and people are coming back

> into the city, particularly workers, but also business owners to

> gather important information and things like that in order to keep

> their businesses going. So yesterday there was a part of the city

> that was repopulated on the West Bank of the river which was

> generally a dry area, but in the coming days and weeks there will

> periods where people are allowed back in to view their homes on the

> East Bank of the river which is one of the more affected areas by

> the water.

>

> So certainly in addition to the mold and the extensive discussion

> we've had on that, we've got other issues that we're paying close

> attention to particularly from a public health standpoint, these

> issues of clean drinking water and sewage systems which just

doesn't

> exist at this time on the East Bank of the river which is a major

> area of Orleans.

>

> So we're advising people that do come into the city whether these

> are essential workers or people who are coming in for the day to

> inspect a home or business that there are other risks associated

> with coming back into the city and that has to do with the water

> that is not suitable for drinking, people can be exposed to

> bacterial contamination that could cause diarrheal illnesses.

>

> The East Bank of Orleans is still under a boil advisory meaning

that

> there's potentially harmful bacteria still in the water supply and

> could be ingested not only from drinking the water but also if it's

> used to bathe or cook or brush teeth or wash hands or things like

> that. So we're asking people to pay close attention to that.

>

> We're also working with the businesses that are up in the area

> because we do have restaurants that are supplying the food to the

> workers and so we are making sure that they have sources of clean

> water and they have proper hand washing and following techniques,

> using disposable plates and things like that so that we're not

> contaminating the workers.

>

> We are making very prominent placards at these places from the

> Health Department saying that they have been cleared to try to,

> again, do as much as we can to educate the general public about the

> safety.

>

> So in addition to the issues of mold we have issues with drinking

> water and sewage, and also a concern of people that would come back

> and attempt to stay in the city at this time. We have other things

> like hospitals. We don't have operational hospitals in the city at

> this time. The 911 system is not operational. Major trauma care is

> not readily available in the and there's a lot of cleanup going on

> in the area with broken glass and things like that that you can

> imagine. So we've got a number of concerns. We're working closely

> with the city on addressing those things as, again, obviously

people

> are very anxious to get back into the city and get back into their

> homes.

>

> MR. SKINNER: Thanks, Dr. Cerise. With that, , I'd like to turn

> it back over to you. We'll begin the question and answer, and

> depending on how many reporters we have in queue, let's just allow

> one question at this time. So we're ready to begin.

>

> OPERATOR: Thank you, and at this time, if you would like to ask a

> question, please press star followed by one on your touchtone

phone.

> To withdraw your request, you may press star two. Once again, to

ask

> a question please press star followed by one.

>

> Our first question comes from Pope with the Times Picayune.

>

> QUESTION: Good afternoon. Greetings from ground zero. I'm calling

> because I've been hearing from colleagues and friends with

children,

> that they are anxious about moving back into New Orleans with their

> children for fear of contamination, possible long-term health

damage

> to their children from stuff that may have been in the water, that

> is blown around as the water dries.

>

> What can you say to address those concerns? And please identify

> yourself because I'm not sure which is who.

>

> MR. SKINNER: Yeah. , it sounds to me like you're asking about

> sediments and what are some of the possible health effects

> associated with sediments and that sort of thing?

>

> QUESTION: Yes. The whole [inaudible]; yes.

>

> MR. SKINNER: Okay. I'll ask Mr. , do you want to try to take

> a stab at that question, sir?

>

> MR. JOHNSON: Sure. I can speak to it. I can speak to it a bit. Yes,

> we, EPA has in close partnership with the state of Louisiana, we

> have implemented a fairly extensive sampling program that is

> focusing both on the floodwaters, on the sediment, and on the air

> quality, and we are looking at a variety of potential contaminants,

> including organic compounds, metals, CCBs. We're looking at fecal

> coliform in the sediment in water, and petroleum hydrocarbons, and

> the like.

>

> And so I think, as you're able to see on our Web site, we are

> evaluating that information and trying to provide, in partnership

> with CDC, health advisories, and we have issued some health

> advisories to focus on people limiting their contact with the

> sediment, limiting their contact with the floodwater, and that's

> what we've been up to.

>

> MR. SKINNER: And Dr. Redd or Dr. Cerise, if you all have anything

to

> add, feel free to do that.

>

> , let's go to the next question, please.

>

> OPERATOR: Thank you. Our next question comes from Maggie Fox with

> Reuters.

>

> MS. FOX: Thanks. I'd like to expand on that because I think what

> was asking was about whether this stuff's blowing around and

in

> the air, and my question expands on that, because when I left New

> Orleans and went to Houston, I heard some amazing rumors from my

> college-age niece, such as that the evacuees were carrying these

> contaminants on their bodies, and that they could breathe mold

> spores on to you. There's a lot of fear about that.

>

> What can be done and what concerns do you have about some of these

> fears that may or may not be founded in fact?

>

> MR. SKINNER: Dr. Redd, do you want to take a crack at that question?

>

> DR. REDD: Sure. I think from the mold standpoint, the specific

thing

> that you mentioned, that's not possible. Actually, the kinds of

> effects that molds can cause, all the ones I mentioned would not be

> communicable.

>

> That the illnesses that people get are from direct exposure from

the

> environment and I think there's a chance that a mold spore could be

> on--you know, a person could carry that from Louisiana to Texas but

> I think that the number of spores and there's really not a

> possibility of a health effect occurring from that kind of

> transportation or a person actually carrying something on their

body

> for any distance, really. That I think that really shouldn't be a

> concern.

>

> might want to talk about the other exposure. I think it's

> probably pretty much the same case, that there are environmental

> exposures that expose the person but they're not generally going to

> create a risk from that person transferring it to someone else.

>

> MR. SKINNER: Mr. , do you want to add anything?

>

> MR. JOHNSON: Sure. I can add something very briefly, and again, I

> would direct you to EPA's Katrina Web site, and, in particular, the

> air data. Within the last couple of days, we have posted some

> additional air data which outlines the kind of monitoring we did

pre-

> Rita in the New Orleans area, to examine the particular issue of

> windblown dust. At this point in time, we have had a number of

> monitors out, in and around the city, in St. Bernard Parish, to

look

> at the particulate matter levels, and we have found at certain

> locations, on certain days, that for unusually sensitive people,

the

> levels--we found some levels that would be of concern to them, and

> we've also found somewhat higher levels in the unhealthy for

> sensitive groups range.

>

> These are all part of EPA's air quality index and it's reported

> pretty explicitly on our Web page. So, in summary, EPA's very

> concerned about the windblown dust. We are working hard with the

> state to get the ambient air quality network reestablished

following

> the hurricane and we expect to be doing additional sampling in the

> coming days and weeks.

>

> MR. SKINNER: Thanks, Mr. . , next question, please.

>

> OPERATOR: Thank you. Todd Zwillich with WebMD, your line is now

open.

>

> MR. ZWILLICH: Hi. Thanks for having us on. This doesn't count as a

> question, Tom.

>

> Just to recap, when you said you found unusually--you found some

> levels that could be of concern to some people, you meant dust and

> not mold; right? You were referring specifically to dust?

>

> MR. JOHNSON: Yes. This is from the Environmental

> Protection Agency. I was referring explicitly to particulate matter

> measurement.

>

> MR. SKINNER: Go ahead with your question.

>

> QUESTION: Just a couple of quick examples of diseases that can be

> caused by toxin exposure in a mold.

>

> MR. SKINNER: Dr. Redd?

>

> DR. REDD: Yes. Well, ingestion of grains or foods that contain

> mycotoxins can, over the long term, lead to liver cancer. If high

> doses are ingested over a short period of time, they can lead to

> liver failure. I think these are not the kinds of problems we're

> likely to see. It's really a situation where foods are stored in

> moist conditions and mold grows and produces toxins, but those are,

> those would be two examples.

>

> MR. SKINNER: Next question, please.

>

> OPERATOR: Thank you. Our next question comes from Miriam Falco with

> CNN.

>

> MS. FALCO: Hi. Thanks for taking these calls. For one thing, could

> you clarify what the symptoms are, what the illnesses are. I might

> have missed that. But my question is you've mentioned a couple of

> times, that the EPA has done extensive testing, and you made a

point

> of explaining what home owners should look for when they're trying

> to hire contractors.

>

> It strikes me odd that in a conference call like this you're

> pointing that out, which leads me to want to ask: Are you seeing

> scams already? Are you--it sounds more like a consumer alert rather

> than a medical alert. So what was the impetus for this type of

> consumer advice?

>

> MR. SKINNER: Mr. , do you want to take that and then we'll

> ask Dr. Redd to elaborate a little bit more on the symptoms.

>

> MR. JOHNSON: Yeah; absolutely. Well, mold is not a new issue and

> it's been our experience over the last several years, that while

> there are some excellent contractors out there, we feel that there

> are also some contractors out there who have diverted people's

> financial resources away from actually remedying the problem, and

> have, you know, had them do things that we do not believe are

> normally critical to fixing the mold problem.

>

> And, for example, while EPA has not done, and has no plans to do

> testing for mold in homes, that often is a path of first suggestion

> by some, and our advice is, to the consumer is simply if you're

> going to be doing testing, know why you're doing it, because it

> oftentimes requires many samples, it's oftentimes difficult to

> interpret, there are no standards for mold levels that you can

> compare them against, and it's simply often a diversion of

resources.

>

> MR. SKINNER: Dr. Redd?

>

> DR. REDD: Yes. The types of illnesses that you would see, for

people

> that have an infection, that could be pneumonia that would have a

> cough and fever associated with it. It could be a fungal sinusitis

> which would be pain in the sinuses, fever. For the allergy

symptoms,

> that would be runny nose, itchy red eyes, and that would be kind of

> the hay fever complex.

>

> Or for people with asthma, that are sensitive to mold and that are

> exposed to mold, that could be shortness of breath, chest

> tightening, problems with breathing, just the typical asthma

> worsening type symptoms.

>

> MR. SKINNER: Great; thank you. , next question, please.

>

> OPERATOR: Thank you. Our next question comes from Mike Stobbe with

> the Associated Press.

>

> MR. STOBBE: Hi. This question's aimed at Dr. Cerise. Doctor, you

> mentioned a situation where people are moving into the west bank

and

> now going back to the east bank. Are you seeing increased cases of

> illness and injury now as compared to, say, a week ago?

>

> DR. CERISE: Actually, we have not seen--they're just beginning to

go

> back. On Monday, they were repopulating a section of the West Bank

> of the river. But we're doing surveillance at the hospitals that

are

> up and at a number of what we call DMATs, or these units, medical

> units that are spread around the city, and we're doing ongoing

> surveillance at those sites and we're not seeing a spike. Mainly

> what we're seeing is injuries, whether they're intentional or

> unintentional, but mainly injuries or accidents from people doing

> work in the area. After that we're seeing some respiratory

symptoms,

> coughing, colds and allergic type symptoms, and then rashes from

> contact with the environment or from other purposes as well. But

> we're not seeing things that people were concerned about in terms

of

> diarrheal illnesses. We really haven't seen spikes in that. And we

> haven't seen a big spike in respiratory type symptoms since people

> started coming back, but that just is a new happening just over the

> past few days.

>

> MR. SKINNER: , next question, please.

>

> OPERATOR: Thank you. Our next question comes from Betsy McKay with

> The Wall Street Journal.

>

> MS. McKAY: Thanks. This question is for any one of you. There seems

> to be some confusion about going back to sediment and what could be

> airborne from the sediment. We know that when the flood waters were

> still pretty prevalent there was a lot of sewage related bacteria

in

> them and presumably that all dries up in the sediment. But does

that

> bacteria or any portion of it become airborne? And then is there

any

> health hazard related to that?

>

> MR. SKINNER: Mr. , do you want to take the first stab at

that

> one?

>

> MR. JOHNSON: Yes, I'll take a stab at it and hopefully Steve will

> follow-up as well.

>

> We were very concerned about this possibility as we were developing

> our environmental sampling plans for the water, sediment and the

> air, and particularly after finding fecal coliforms in the water

and

> in the sediment, the next natural question is the very question

that

> you posed.

>

> What we did at EPA was we got with our Office of Research and

> Development and we had a series of conference calls that probably

> had 20 to 30 both CDC and EPA scientists on it discussing what the

> value would be of monitoring for potential biological contaminates

> in the air particulate or as aerosols.

>

> The conclusion of the entire group, and it was the consensus that I

> heard, was that monitoring of biologicals in the airstream would

not

> really be a useful tool for helping to inform public health

> decisions because there are no actionable levels, there is no

> relationship between any levels that might be found in the air and

> the likelihood of a public health outcome.

>

> So for some of those reasons which the CDC is really I think in a

> much better position to respond to, the decision and the advice

> coming from the two agencies' scientists was that we would not

> pursue that.

>

> MR. SKINNER: Dr. Redd, do you have anything to add?

>

> DR. REDD: Obviously I concur with that statement. I think the big

> thing to recognize is that when the fecal coliforms are dried

> they'll die and there won't be a risk of infection from that. There

> will still be some material that will be left from that and that is

> probably the most significant risk for that which I think is

> probably not as significant as the allergic risk for mold that

would

> be some kind of irritative or allergic kind of response. And as Mr.

> mentioned, there is no actionable level that you could say

> this level is dangerous and below that threshold it is not

dangerous.

>

> MR. SKINNER: Thanks. , let's take a couple of more questions.

>

> OPERATOR: Thank you. Our next question comes from

from

> MedPage Today.

>

> MR. SMITH: I just want to get a sense probably from Dr. Cerise, but

> if anybody wants to comment that would be good. The hospitals in

New

> Orleans in particular are not operating as well, although I assume

> throughout the rest of the Gulf Coast things are pretty good or at

> least not as bad.

>

> If people go back into areas where there's lots of mold and start

to

> have symptoms, what can the health system do? Are we looking at a

> lot of health symptoms that might overwhelm the facilities?

>

> DR. CERISE: It's a good question and it's a point that we are

trying

> to make in terms of folks coming back into the city. Certainly for

> repopulating the city one of the things that we want to make sure

is

> we've got the medical infrastructure to handle folks coming back

and

> living in the city.

>

> Right now we have three hospitals up in the surrounding areas of

> Orleans and they are not at capacity. They're able to accommodate

> more at this point in time, so we haven't seen those hospitals

reach

> capacity. We also have a number of like I said type of emergency

> room units set up around the city and to this point none of them

> have been close to being overwhelmed. They are there as

> precautionary measures. They're providing services.

>

> But we feel like there's plenty of capacity at this point. And the

> three hospitals, they're large hospitals that didn't go down during

> the hurricane so they maintained power, they have water and

sewerage

> and they have a significant ability to ramp up should they need to

> do that.

>

> We also have, in fact it's arriving today or tomorrow, a large Navy

> vessel, the USS Comfort, that's got 250 beds. It's primarily being

> brought in for tertiary care purposes. If there's trauma or severe

> problems that happen in the city proper that need immediate

> attention, that vessel will be available as well.

>

> MR. SKINNER: , let's take one final question, please.

>

> OPERATOR: Thank you. Our final question comes from Maggie Fox with

> Reuters.

>

> MS. FOX: I just want to follow-up on the very earliest thing. If

> this testing for mold isn't called for, do you just treat mold if

> you happen to see it? Is that it, just eye-balling it?

>

> MR. REDD: We recommend visual inspection and the threshold for

> different actions, there really are two. One is if there's a

surface

> that is nonporous that can be cleaned, that would be the preferred

> approach. If the contaminated material is porous, then that needs

to

> be removed. If it's a large area that's porous, that would call for

> professional remediation.

>

> MR. SKINNER: That was Dr. Redd from CDC.

>

> MR. JOHNSON: This is from EPA. I would just add to that that

> one of the challenges of visual inspection is often times mold

> problems can actually be hidden behind wallpaper, behind wallboard

> and the like, so sometimes that is a consideration as well.

>

> MR. SKINNER: Thanks. , thank you. Thank you to all of our

> participants. Thank you to the media who dialed in. Stay tuned for

> further updates. We'll continue to keep you all informed as new

> developments come about. Thank you again for your interest.

>

> Listen to the telebriefing

>

>

>

> © Communitydispatch.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

" pizzahutoxic " < wrote:

> So the CDC's B.S. stance is that mycotoxins can only cause harm if

> eaten or touched, but not breathed in. <

Well, many " Mold Experts " have the belief that this is an " Indoor Air

Quality " problem and that if the number of spores inside is no

different than the level inside - there is no problem at all.

I proposed that they could erect walls around the outside area where

the testing was done and turn all the " outdoor spores " into " Indoor

spores " thus making them a toxic problem, but this didn't appear to

make any sense to them.

As for me, my lungs just refuse to listen to the " experts " and don't

seem to care whether they are indoors or outdoors when I inhale Stachy.

-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for this post. I agree that the statements by

the CDC are misleading. Regarding this airborne mold

issue, my attorney says this is the problem in proving

the mold made me sick in my home. He is also an

asbestos attorney. Isn't airborne asbestos dangerous,

and why would mold be any different? This does seem

like a cop out to me.

--- pizzahutoxic <pizzahutoxic@...> wrote:

> So the CDC's B.S. stance is that mycotoxins can only

> cause harm if

> eaten or touched, but not breathed in. If you

> breathe something in,

> it is touching stuff. Your much more delicate

> innards compared to

> your skin. Skin does not have the absorbency

> capacity that your

> throat, stomach or lungs do. This is why we put

> medicines in our

> body usually and not on it. What a complete liar!

> Then the EPA guy

> says don't waste your money testing the mold, just

> get rid of it.

> Which really means when you are cleaning up your

> place in full body

> armor and you get brain fog and chronic fatigue,

> etc., we don't want

> you to associate that with the specific molds and

> the mycotoxins they

> produce or we may have to tell the truth!! And that

> other guy, who

> cares? If only these people were held accountable

> for their lies.

> Only in government are people not accountable!!

>

>

>

> > FEMA Announcements Last Updated: Sep 29th, 2005

> - 07:29:19

> >

> >

> >

>

http://communitydispatch.com/artman/publish/article_2249.shtml

>

> >

>

>

> >

>

> > Update on Health Issues Related to Mold, Mildew

> and Mud in

> Hurricane

> > and Flood Affected Areas

> > By Center for Disease Control and Prevention

> >

> >

> > Sep 29, 2005, 07:08

> >

> >

> >

> > Wednesday, September 28, 2005

> >

> > MR. SKINNER: Thank you, , and thank you all

> for joining us

> > today for this important call.

> >

> > There continues to be a lot of interest, and

> rightly so, about the

> > potential health concerns for people in areas that

> have been

> > impacted by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. One

> particular concern

> that

> > continues to be gathering a lot of attention are

> the potential

> > health effects to mold and mildew, and so we

> decided to pull this

> > media briefing together.

> >

> > With us today is Dr. Redd from the Centers

> for Disease

> > Control and Prevention, Mr. from

> the Environmental

> > Protection Agency, and Mr. Fred Cerise, the

> secretary of the

> > Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals.

> >

> > What we'll do is have each one of them provide two

> or three minutes

> > of opening remarks and then we'll open it up for

> question and

> answer.

> >

> > And let me remind everyone on the call that we do

> have someone from

> > the state of Louisiana, you know, Mr. Fred, Dr.

> Fred Cerise on the

> > line, but much of what we're going to be talking

> about is also

> > applicable to the other areas that have been

> impacted by these

> > hurricanes in Mississippi and Alabama and parts of

> Texas as well.

> >

> > So we hope you are able to get some useful

> information from this

> > call and with that, I'd like to begin by having

> Dr. Steve Redd

> > provide some opening remarks.

> >

> > DR. REDD: Thanks, Tom.

> >

> > I want to just reiterate a couple of the things

> that you mentioned,

> > that mold exposure is just one of the hazards or

> potential hazards

> > that people are going to be exposed to as they

> return to their

> homes

> > and start their lives in the aftermath of these

> hurricanes.

> >

> > The mold issue is something that will affect the

> entire Gulf Coast

> > region but is going to be a particular problem in

> New Orleans

> > because of the flooding that's occurred there and

> the duration of

> > the flooding.

> >

> > What I would like to do in my remarks here is go

> over briefly just

> a

> > little bit about what mold is, what the health

> effects are, and

> then

> > our recommendations for cleanup and protection

> from mold exposure.

> >

> > So molds are a class of organisms that is separate

> from plants and

> > animals. They have some characteristics of both of

> those but they

> > live on organic material and the thing

> that--they're present

> > everywhere. The thing that kind a keeps them in

> check in indoor

> > environments normally is the limitation of

> moisture.

> >

> > They require a nutrient source, the right

> temperature and water,

> and

> > normally, there's not enough water present to

> promote their growth.

> >

> > As we know, both from wind and rain damage, and

> then from flooding

> > as well, the conditions for mold growth in the

> Gulf Coast region in

> > many buildings is really optimal now.

> >

> > The health effects of mold--the second thing I'm

> going to talk

> about-

> > -there are really three major categories.

> >

> > The first is infection and that is particularly a

> problem in people

> > that have suppressed immune systems. Either

> they're taking

> medicines

> > that prevent their immune systems from fighting

> infection normally,

> > or they have illnesses that suppress their immune

> system.

> >

> > The second general category is allergy and this is

> for people who

> > have allergies to particular molds. If they're

> re-exposed to those

> > molds, they'll have symptoms like hay fever or

> skin rash or

> > worsening of asthma.

> >

> > The third category is that of toxin-mediated

> disease. Some molds

> are

> > capable of producing toxins. They won't produce

> these toxins at all

> > times but under certain circumstances, like the

> nutrient supply is

> > getting short or some environmental issue, they

> may start producing

> > toxins and those can be dangerous if they're eaten

> or if they're

> > touched.

> >

> > There's up to now not been evidence that airborne

> mold toxins have

> > produced disease.

> >

> > Now the next category is talking about what to do

> to get rid of

> > mold. The thing that we say under normal

> circumstances is you have

> > to identify the water source. In this case that is

> no mystery but

>

=== message truncated ===

__________________________________

- PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005

http://mail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever you breathe in goes to the back of your throat. Whatever goes to the

back of your throat, we usually swallow. Hello CDC.....quit messin' with the

words. Mold can be a serious problem to those who are weak in their Immune

system or had been taking antibiotics. Not to mention the people who are

allergic to mold and did not know.

All I know is , I inhaled, swallowed, and had it on my skin and I am fighting

for my life because of it. Stachybotrys did not have any problems growing inside

my body or make me sick. All my friends have to do is look at me now compared to

before and they know something happened. MOLD!!!!

I DARE someone from CDC to look at me and what happened and then tell me it was

not because of the mold. Bring on the doctors CDC and while you are at it....FIX

ME!!!!!!

Marcie

erikmoldwarrior <erikmoldwarrior@...> wrote:

" pizzahutoxic " < wrote:

> So the CDC's B.S. stance is that mycotoxins can only cause harm if

> eaten or touched, but not breathed in. <

Well, many " Mold Experts " have the belief that this is an " Indoor Air

Quality " problem and that if the number of spores inside is no

different than the level inside - there is no problem at all.

I proposed that they could erect walls around the outside area where

the testing was done and turn all the " outdoor spores " into " Indoor

spores " thus making them a toxic problem, but this didn't appear to

make any sense to them.

As for me, my lungs just refuse to listen to the " experts " and don't

seem to care whether they are indoors or outdoors when I inhale Stachy.

-

FAIR USE NOTICE:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I DARE someone from CDC to look at me and what happened and then tell me it was

not because of the mold. Bring on the doctors CDC and while you are at it....FIX

ME!!!!!!

Marcie

Elvira makes two CDC bring it onnnnnnnnnnnnnnn Right on Marcie.

Elvira

Re: [] Re: CDC,EPA,Department of Health .......Interview

Whatever you breathe in goes to the back of your throat. Whatever goes to the

back of your throat, we usually swallow. Hello CDC.....quit messin' with the

words. Mold can be a serious problem to those who are weak in their Immune

system or had been taking antibiotics. Not to mention the people who are

allergic to mold and did not know.

All I know is , I inhaled, swallowed, and had it on my skin and I am fighting

for my life because of it. Stachybotrys did not have any problems growing inside

my body or make me sick. All my friends have to do is look at me now compared to

before and they know something happened. MOLD!!!!

I DARE someone from CDC to look at me and what happened and then tell me it

was not because of the mold. Bring on the doctors CDC and while you are at

it....FIX ME!!!!!!

Marcie

erikmoldwarrior <erikmoldwarrior@...> wrote:

" pizzahutoxic " < wrote:

> So the CDC's B.S. stance is that mycotoxins can only cause harm if

> eaten or touched, but not breathed in. <

Well, many " Mold Experts " have the belief that this is an " Indoor Air

Quality " problem and that if the number of spores inside is no

different than the level inside - there is no problem at all.

I proposed that they could erect walls around the outside area where

the testing was done and turn all the " outdoor spores " into " Indoor

spores " thus making them a toxic problem, but this didn't appear to

make any sense to them.

As for me, my lungs just refuse to listen to the " experts " and don't

seem to care whether they are indoors or outdoors when I inhale Stachy.

-

FAIR USE NOTICE:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WE ARE WAITING CDC......Chicken?

Marcie

elvira52 <Elvira52@...> wrote:

I DARE someone from CDC to look at me and what happened and then tell me it was

not because of the mold. Bring on the doctors CDC and while you are at it....FIX

ME!!!!!!

Marcie

Elvira makes two CDC bring it onnnnnnnnnnnnnnn Right on Marcie.

Elvira

Re: [] Re: CDC,EPA,Department of Health .......Interview

Whatever you breathe in goes to the back of your throat. Whatever goes to the

back of your throat, we usually swallow. Hello CDC.....quit messin' with the

words. Mold can be a serious problem to those who are weak in their Immune

system or had been taking antibiotics. Not to mention the people who are

allergic to mold and did not know.

All I know is , I inhaled, swallowed, and had it on my skin and I am fighting

for my life because of it. Stachybotrys did not have any problems growing inside

my body or make me sick. All my friends have to do is look at me now compared to

before and they know something happened. MOLD!!!!

I DARE someone from CDC to look at me and what happened and then tell me it

was not because of the mold. Bring on the doctors CDC and while you are at

it....FIX ME!!!!!!

Marcie

erikmoldwarrior <erikmoldwarrior@...> wrote:

" pizzahutoxic " < wrote:

> So the CDC's B.S. stance is that mycotoxins can only cause harm if

> eaten or touched, but not breathed in. <

Well, many " Mold Experts " have the belief that this is an " Indoor Air

Quality " problem and that if the number of spores inside is no

different than the level inside - there is no problem at all.

I proposed that they could erect walls around the outside area where

the testing was done and turn all the " outdoor spores " into " Indoor

spores " thus making them a toxic problem, but this didn't appear to

make any sense to them.

As for me, my lungs just refuse to listen to the " experts " and don't

seem to care whether they are indoors or outdoors when I inhale Stachy.

-

FAIR USE NOTICE:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That sounds Good to me Marcie.

Peace

Elvira

Re: [] Re: CDC,EPA,Department of Health

........Interview

Whatever you breathe in goes to the back of your throat. Whatever goes to

the back of your throat, we usually swallow. Hello CDC.....quit messin' with the

words. Mold can be a serious problem to those who are weak in their Immune

system or had been taking antibiotics. Not to mention the people who are

allergic to mold and did not know.

All I know is , I inhaled, swallowed, and had it on my skin and I am

fighting for my life because of it. Stachybotrys did not have any problems

growing inside my body or make me sick. All my friends have to do is look at me

now compared to before and they know something happened. MOLD!!!!

I DARE someone from CDC to look at me and what happened and then tell me it

was not because of the mold. Bring on the doctors CDC and while you are at

it....FIX ME!!!!!!

Marcie

erikmoldwarrior <erikmoldwarrior@...> wrote:

" pizzahutoxic " < wrote:

> So the CDC's B.S. stance is that mycotoxins can only cause harm if

> eaten or touched, but not breathed in. <

Well, many " Mold Experts " have the belief that this is an " Indoor Air

Quality " problem and that if the number of spores inside is no

different than the level inside - there is no problem at all.

I proposed that they could erect walls around the outside area where

the testing was done and turn all the " outdoor spores " into " Indoor

spores " thus making them a toxic problem, but this didn't appear to

make any sense to them.

As for me, my lungs just refuse to listen to the " experts " and don't

seem to care whether they are indoors or outdoors when I inhale Stachy.

-

FAIR USE NOTICE:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Group,

> Then the EPA guy says don't

> waste your money testing the mold, just get rid of it.

If you know the mold is there, especially if you can see it, what

else do you need to know it is mold and it should be removed? Why

spend the money on testing? The testing isn't going to the tell you

anything that will change the fact that it should be removed. Knowing

the kind of mold doesn't change how to clean it because all molds are

removed and cleaned the same way. Despite the other arguable

comments, this one is actually good advice. Mold removal is expensive

enough without the added cost of unnecessary testing plus the cost of

unnecessary chemicals and other methods of killing it.

Carl Grimes

Healthy Habitats LLC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a message dated 9/30/2005 11:28:18 PM Pacific Standard Time,

grimes@... writes:

Group,

> Then the EPA guy says don't

> waste your money testing the mold, just get rid of it.

If you know the mold is there, especially if you can see it, what

else do you need to know it is mold and it should be removed? Why

spend the money on testing? The testing isn't going to the tell you

anything that will change the fact that it should be removed. Knowing

the kind of mold doesn't change how to clean it because all molds are

removed and cleaned the same way. Despite the other arguable

comments, this one is actually good advice. Mold removal is expensive

enough without the added cost of unnecessary testing plus the cost of

unnecessary chemicals and other methods of killing it.

Carl Grimes

Healthy Habitats LLC

Hi Carl,

That's good advice from the standpoint of what needs to be done to

physically remove the mold. But most times there are other concerns with the

mold

issue. For instance, a teacher who has been made sick from a school

environment

and is not able to return to work. If she is intending to go on disablility

or request worker's comp, then the testing is relevant to establish that the

school is what has made her ill. Also, in some situations, one needs to

test prior to remediation as a basis to be compared against post remediation

efforts to establish that the work that was done was effective in eliminating

the problem.

If I was a reputable remediator, I would want pre-testing to protect me from

liability. I would want to be able to establish through the documentation

of tape and air samples, that the work I did was effective. I would also want

to know that my crew had not cross-contaminated the structure during the

remediation process. I would want to make sure that the air borne mold spore

count was not higher after I finished then before I started. Pre and post

testing within the containment area and outside of the containment area is the

only

way to establish this.

So from a physical aspect, you are correct: See mold, clean it up. But from

a liability, documentation as to cause of illness and verification of job

effectiveness, testing is necessary. So yes, testing does add to the initial

cost of mold remediation, but this cost is minimal compared to the potential

liability costs of not testing and the cost of lost necessary documentation.

As this is one of the most litigated issues in the history of mankind, better

to be safe than sorry.

Sharon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does this make sense too?

Then the doctor says don't waste your money testing the cancer, just

get rid of it.

It stands to reason that doctors send cancer biopsies for testing to

find out what kind of cancer, because there are different treatments

for different cancers right?

Isn't the same true for different treatments and symptoms for

different molds? Example: molds such as stachybotrys and chaetomium

cause Multiple sclerosis symptoms. So wouldn't it make sense to find

out what kind of mold your dealing with. Some molds can be more

deadly than others right? It also could help with a lawsuit to show

what mold was actually was present and what kind of symptoms can

arise from that particular mold and evidence to back up any medical

lawsuit. I would test for peace of mind, just to find out what kind

of mold made me sick. Thanks,

--- In , " Carl E. Grimes " <grimes@h...>

wrote:

> Group,

>

> > Then the EPA guy says don't

> > waste your money testing the mold, just get rid of it.

>

> If you know the mold is there, especially if you can see it, what

> else do you need to know it is mold and it should be removed? Why

> spend the money on testing? The testing isn't going to the tell

you

> anything that will change the fact that it should be removed.

Knowing

> the kind of mold doesn't change how to clean it because all molds

are

> removed and cleaned the same way. Despite the other arguable

> comments, this one is actually good advice. Mold removal is

expensive

> enough without the added cost of unnecessary testing plus the cost

of

> unnecessary chemicals and other methods of killing it.

>

> Carl Grimes

> Healthy Habitats LLC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Expense is not always the problem. Where litigation is anticipated, you'd want

as much documentation as possible.Otherwise, they can call it " mildew " , and you

can't prove otherwise. Or else, they will say, " There are more mold spores

outside than inside, " and absent any fully speciated tests, you still don't have

what you would need to prove up your case. Different objectives require

different methods and activities. If all I really needed was to clean a place

up, then cleaning it up should suffice. But if I were damaged by a negligent

landlord or property seller or employer, then it's perfectly reasonable and

prudent to collect all the evidence necessary to gain compensation for the

injuries sustained.

To do less in that sort of situation would be like saying, " Jane Doe was

half-eaten by a bear owned by " , and then settling for tests that only

proved there were mammals in the general vicinity, and of course everyone knows

that mammals eat stuff. You might know the bear did it, and I might know the

bear did it - but a judge or a jury needs compelling evidence that ties the

injury to the claim. Any half-baked defense attorney would then have Jane Doe's

case for breakfast, even though you'd done nothing wrong or unreasonable in

fixing her up after the attack.

And I didn't even mention the Long Term Disability and Worker's Comp carriers,

who are are whole other level of legal hell for mold victims. This is all most

likely going to be a different thing for Katrina victims, but for the rest of

us, we have to fit the response to the exact situation. The CDC doesn't care

about any of that. The best treating physcicians probably wouldn't care anything

about that. The world's best remediation experts might not care anything about

that. But victims and their attorneys have to consider the best testing they can

get.

Serena

www.freeboards.net/index.php?mforum=sickgovernmentb

---------------------------------

for Good

Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a message dated 10/1/2005 4:29:53 PM Pacific Standard Time,

kl_clayton@... writes:

Well, ok, but if you own your own home, and find out there is a hidden

problem, if you

know what is there, it is possible you could be held liable if it returns,

in this insane day

of litigating every single thing under the sun.

And, I believe, given normal practices in remodeling, it is almost

guaranteed to recur any

time there is water intrusion, or moisture condensing.

Who wants to put themselves in that kind of danger, in addition to the

health we have

already lost? Esp when this is costing so much to remediate in the first

place? And if I DO

find a remediator, where is the guarantee he will know what he is doing?

No, for many of us, testing is a really bad idea. Bad, bad. Mold is all

dangerous, so just get

rid of it.

You are right, sometimes it is not necessary to test, but sometimes it is

necessary. As far as being held liable for the mold if it returns, people do

not get sued for mold. What they get sued for is not disclosing what they

know of mold. So to test or not to test is not relevant if you suspect there a

problem when you go to sell or rent. If you suspect it, disclose it to the

potential buyer. That gives them the opportunity to investigate on their own

and self satisfy. That's how you protect yourself from liability. Just be

honest and upfront. The Golden Rule of Real Estate is " When in doubt,

disclose. "

When you do find a remediator, and you want to really check their history,

go to the local courthouse and see if he has been involved in prior litigation

over his remediation work. And how many times. Also, put all questions to

your remediator in writing. There are some really good remediators and some

really bad ones. Just be careful and check it out.

But you are right in the statement that if you are a homeowner who is

intending to live in the home and are paying for the remediation, nobody could

be

damaged from not testing but you. So it is definately your choice. Personally,

as someone who has lived through a botched remediation and cross

contamination, had we not had the pre-remediation testing, it would have been

pretty

near impossible to prove that our entire home had a much higher airborne mold

spore count after the remediation than it did before the remediation. These

pre and post tests were what enabled us to receive a sizeable settlement

instead of losing everything we owned.

Sharon

Sharon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think for lawsuit reasons and for your own health, you should send

off a few samples for speciation. But be sure to take them right and

call the lab first to figure out what needs to be done for

speciation. Most will just go to the genus level. Once you figure

out what species you are dealing with then you can find out what

mycotoxins they make and what those can do to you. As for

stachbotrys and chaetmomium being the worst because they damage the

myelin sheath, I have recently read about species of aspergillus and

penicillium doing that to.

> > Group,

> >

> > > Then the EPA guy says don't

> > > waste your money testing the mold, just get rid of it.

> >

> > If you know the mold is there, especially if you can see it, what

> > else do you need to know it is mold and it should be removed? Why

> > spend the money on testing? The testing isn't going to the tell

> you

> > anything that will change the fact that it should be removed.

> Knowing

> > the kind of mold doesn't change how to clean it because all molds

> are

> > removed and cleaned the same way. Despite the other arguable

> > comments, this one is actually good advice. Mold removal is

> expensive

> > enough without the added cost of unnecessary testing plus the

cost

> of

> > unnecessary chemicals and other methods of killing it.

> >

> > Carl Grimes

> > Healthy Habitats LLC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, ok, but if you own your own home, and find out there is a hidden problem,

if you

know what is there, it is possible you could be held liable if it returns, in

this insane day

of litigating every single thing under the sun.

And, I believe, given normal practices in remodeling, it is almost guaranteed to

recur any

time there is water intrusion, or moisture condensing.

Who wants to put themselves in that kind of danger, in addition to the health

we have

already lost? Esp when this is costing so much to remediate in the first place?

And if I DO

find a remediator, where is the guarantee he will know what he is doing?

No, for many of us, testing is a really bad idea. Bad, bad. Mold is all

dangerous, so just get

rid of it.

>

> In a message dated 9/30/2005 11:28:18 PM Pacific Standard Time,

> grimes@h... writes:

>

> Group,

>

> > Then the EPA guy says don't

> > waste your money testing the mold, just get rid of it.

>

> If you know the mold is there, especially if you can see it, what

> else do you need to know it is mold and it should be removed? Why

> spend the money on testing? The testing isn't going to the tell you

> anything that will change the fact that it should be removed. Knowing

> the kind of mold doesn't change how to clean it because all molds are

> removed and cleaned the same way. Despite the other arguable

> comments, this one is actually good advice. Mold removal is expensive

> enough without the added cost of unnecessary testing plus the cost of

> unnecessary chemicals and other methods of killing it.

>

> Carl Grimes

> Healthy Habitats LLC

>

>

> Hi Carl,

>

> That's good advice from the standpoint of what needs to be done to

> physically remove the mold. But most times there are other concerns with the

mold

> issue. For instance, a teacher who has been made sick from a school

environment

> and is not able to return to work. If she is intending to go on disablility

> or request worker's comp, then the testing is relevant to establish that the

> school is what has made her ill. Also, in some situations, one needs to

> test prior to remediation as a basis to be compared against post remediation

> efforts to establish that the work that was done was effective in eliminating

> the problem.

>

> If I was a reputable remediator, I would want pre-testing to protect me from

> liability. I would want to be able to establish through the documentation

> of tape and air samples, that the work I did was effective. I would also want

> to know that my crew had not cross-contaminated the structure during the

> remediation process. I would want to make sure that the air borne mold spore

> count was not higher after I finished then before I started. Pre and post

> testing within the containment area and outside of the containment area is

the only

> way to establish this.

>

> So from a physical aspect, you are correct: See mold, clean it up. But from

> a liability, documentation as to cause of illness and verification of job

> effectiveness, testing is necessary. So yes, testing does add to the initial

> cost of mold remediation, but this cost is minimal compared to the potential

> liability costs of not testing and the cost of lost necessary documentation.

> As this is one of the most litigated issues in the history of mankind, better

> to be safe than sorry.

>

> Sharon

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, you have to fit the procedures to the situation. Although, I can't actually

imagine being willing to live in any building which has had to have extensive

remediation anyway - and for the same reasons you state. I would have no

guarantee that the work was performed correctly or effectively. I'd like to

think that I'd spot a place that was still contaminated, but I still wouldn't

want to risk it. If I missed even a relatively low level of continued

contamination, I'd be in a bad spot. Not worth it.

kl_clayton <kl_clayton@...> wrote:Well, ok, but if you own your own home,

and find out there is a hidden problem, if you

know what is there, it is possible you could be held liable if it returns, in

this insane day

of litigating every single thing under the sun.

And, I believe, given normal practices in remodeling, it is almost guaranteed to

recur any

time there is water intrusion, or moisture condensing.

Who wants to put themselves in that kind of danger, in addition to the health

we have

already lost? Esp when this is costing so much to remediate in the first place?

And if I DO

find a remediator, where is the guarantee he will know what he is doing?

No, for many of us, testing is a really bad idea. Bad, bad. Mold is all

dangerous, so just get

rid of it.

Serena

www.freeboards.net/index.php?mforum=sickgovernmentb

---------------------------------

for Good

Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> If you know the mold is there, especially if you can see it, what

> else do you need to know it is mold and it should be removed? Why

> spend the money on testing? The testing isn't going to the tell you

> anything that will change the fact that it should be removed. Knowing

> the kind of mold doesn't change how to clean it because all molds are

> removed and cleaned the same way. Despite the other arguable

> comments, this one is actually good advice. Mold removal is expensive

> enough without the added cost of unnecessary testing plus the cost of

> unnecessary chemicals and other methods of killing it.

>

> Carl Grimes

> Healthy Habitats LLC

Thank you Carl. I totally agree with you especially for homeowners who are

not contemplating a lawsuit or applying for disability. When our home was

contaminated with mold from Tropical Storm we could have chosen to

find expensive labs however we didn't have the funds and homeowner's

insurance didn't cover the remediation since our contract stipulated

" plumbing related mold " which we did not have. Who would we have sued?

What good would the mold tests have been to us other than curiosity. I

became sick from the mold. To this day I still can't identify them and it

doesn't matter.

Have a friend out of state who had mold due to improper installation of her

washer, she had massive flooding and resulting mold. She did order the mold

tests because she is in litigation with the appliance store installers to

recover the remediation expenses. That's a different matter. For those of us

who have no legal recourse, no one to sue, why spend the money unless we

have excess finances.

I still need to order your book. Now that Rita has passed with minimal

damage other than roof/water leak and debris in backyard, I'll have time to

order and read it. FYI, the contractors down here (and I'm working with a

number of them after our tornado damage in May and the roof/ceiling damage

from Rita) are not concerned about mold. I'm the one telling them what to do

and I'm doing the preliminary steps to insure mold will not grow. It's

amazing with all the publicity they don't care. And I can see why so many

homes with repair will be contaminated with mold. Yesterday had another

contractor over trying to determine the source of the water leak and I

noticed a faucet was leaking in upstairs bathroom. Asked the contractor if

he had the skills and time to check it out. He agreed to do this before he

left. Around 5:30pm he came down and said faucet was repaired. I paid him

and he left. About 9:30pm my husband came home, went upstairs to change and

I heard a lot of noise. Ran upstairs and he was busily trying to clean up

water leak. Seems the contractor hadn't repaired the faucet and made it

worse. It was leaking under the sink, had covered the ceramic floor with

water. Hubby took everything out under the sink and had towels on the

floor. Had he not gone upstairs we would have had a second floor flood,

ruined our hardwood floor, flooded our ceilings and caused major damage. We

called the contractor and his comment was well, I guess it needs a new

gasket or something.

Rosie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Rosie,

Posted this before, but wanted to make sure you saw this. Here is why

testing proved very important for our family.

You are right in the statement that if you are a homeowner who is

intending to live in the home and are paying for the remediation, nobody

could be

damaged from not testing but you. So it is definately your choice.

Personally,

as someone who has lived through a botched remediation and cross

contamination, had we not had the pre-remediation testing, it would have

been pretty

near impossible to prove that our entire home had a much higher airborne

mold

spore count after the remediation than it did before the remediation.

These

pre and post tests were what enabled us to receive a sizeable settlement

instead of losing everything we owned.

Sharon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sharon, Serena, KL, pizzahutoxic, Rosie and others,

Good job on discussing reasons for mold testing!

In my own defense, let me say that I was responding only to the

question of when should mold be removed, which was the point of the

news story. Obviously there are other important concerns and reasons

for testing (or not) especially for medical and legal issues that you

have pointed out.

This is actually the most important part of the process. Why are you

testing? What is the specific question you need answered that you

can't get from other (usually more reliable) means?

-To remove mold or leave it alone?

-To prove the mold is the cause of physical, medical, financial harm?

-To prove to family and friends that your illness is real?

-Your own piece of mind that it is mold and not something else?

-So your doctor knows how to properly treat you?

-If mold was removed did they get enough of it to stop your

reactions?

-To verify that the rest of the building was or was not cross-

contaminated?

But don't use testing to answer the question of whether or not it

should be removed. Remove it! Don't move into a moldy house. Stop the

exposure as quickly as you can so you don't become incredibly ill and

involved in a WComp, legal or medical battle. Don't wait for an

outside authority to give you permission to honor your experience and

take care of yourself!

But if you are already at that point and need help to convince the

skeptics, whether medical or legal or family, then PLEASE don't do it

yourself, especially with the consumer stuff at hardware stores or

with settling plates. They are at best a simple and unreliable

screening device that MAY help identify the need for a complete

assessment. And they most likely won't give you a representative

profile of what is happening. They will most likely NOT identify what

is truly happening. Beware of false negatives!

As previously discussed by many of us, there is no single definitive

test for mold. Every combination of methods of collection and types

of analysis only gives you a couple pieces of the 1000 piece " jigsaw

puzzle " of the circumstances, not the whole picture.

Is it the most dominant mold that is causing your problems or the

single colony of an unusual one? The one that wasn't detected? Which

species? Which variety of that species? Or the total amount of mold?

Did it not grow on a culture plate because it is dead? Or is it in

combination with other exposure sources?

Most discussion lately concerns mycotoxins but NONE of the simple

tests discussed will detect mycotoxins. Yes, knowing the species will

help with the POSSIBILITY of mycotoxins but it still isn't definitive

to a skeptic or defense lawyer. Besides, Stachy is but one of about

20,000 black molds and it comes in at least three varieties, only one

of which produces mycotoxins.

The tests, even when done by the best professionals, are a snap shot

of what can be detected by the methods used from the location

selected at that precise time. Not the whole picture.

Finally, most testing does not verify what your actual exposure is or

the level of exposure. A comprehensive assessment that MAY include

testing is necessary for that. Knowing the limitations of testing

will help in generating an accurate interpretation of the results in

the context of other factors.

Please don't misunderstand and think I am trying to discredit our

real life experiences with mold (and other) exposures. I've been

there, done that. But if we want to gain credibility with our

skeptics then we must be careful not to spin our information our way

anymore than the skeptics and the dishonorable spin it their way. We

must maintain hope but not falsely.

And that may be the hardest part of our journey: Maybe not ever

knowing for sure what caused what and when it will stop. I know some

about mine but most is still a mystery.

was quoted in a recent news story posted here as

saying, (paraphrasing) we don't know why this is happening but we

can't wait 20 years before we do something.

So keep fighting the good fight. Just don't overly rely on mold

testing. A false negative is not your friend!

Carl Grimes

Healthy Habitats LLC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> And that may be the hardest part of our journey: Maybe not ever

> knowing for sure what caused what and when it will stop. I know some

> about mine but most is still a mystery.

>

> was quoted in a recent news story posted here as

> saying, (paraphrasing) we don't know why this is happening but we

> can't wait 20 years before we do something.

>

> So keep fighting the good fight. Just don't overly rely on mold

> testing. A false negative is not your friend!

>

> Carl Grimes

Carl thank you for giving us a reality check. This is exactly what I've

thought but needed to hear from an expert. Does your book cover all this?

If it does than I think we should be reading to the book to help us

understand reality and not waste our precious resources. What we all need,

in my humble opinion, is a book written for the public and those afflicted

with mold/chemical illness on what works and what doesn't; how to address

mold problems, what to do and not to do, how to find qualified contractors

if that's possible, etc.

If your book addresses these down-to-earth basic issues please email me

privately your telephone number so I can order a copy.

Houston is full of moldy homes, everyone is talking about NewOrleans, not

many are mentioning the thousands of homes and buildings damaged from

Hurricane Rita that caused so much destruction along the East Texas and LA

areas; not mega cities but very small towns with many poor people who don't

have many choices in having the finances to rebuild or relocate to safer

areas or running to high altitudes. They can only flee to the nearest

shelter set up for them. Homes and buildings in Houston from Tropical Storm

almost 5 years ago are still contaminated from mold, people are ill,

many buildings and homes I cannot enter due to my reaction and yes I'm at

the point where I can allow my body to warn me of the danger. Those living

in them have not been educated or they don't have any viable solutions

unfortunately.

Rosie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Marcy:

I had Lupus (SLE) before the mold exposure. Was in remission for 10 years

using dietary protocols, appropriate herbs, stress control and minimized my

environmental toxins, organic gardening, etc.

My heart goes out to you because I do understand.

Rosie

> Try having MS before you get exposed to Stachybotrys....oh what fun this

> is!!!!!

> Marcie

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HEY GANG, DOES ANYBODY HAVE PHONE NUMBERS FOR DR DAVID HOLLAND, DR DAVID

STRAUSS, & DR ANDREW CAMPBELL?

THANKS!

VICTORIA

Re: [] Re: CDC,EPA,Department of Health

........Interview

>

>> And that may be the hardest part of our journey: Maybe not ever

>> knowing for sure what caused what and when it will stop. I know some

>> about mine but most is still a mystery.

>>

>> was quoted in a recent news story posted here as

>> saying, (paraphrasing) we don't know why this is happening but we

>> can't wait 20 years before we do something.

>>

>> So keep fighting the good fight. Just don't overly rely on mold

>> testing. A false negative is not your friend!

>>

>> Carl Grimes

>

> Carl thank you for giving us a reality check. This is exactly what I've

> thought but needed to hear from an expert. Does your book cover all this?

> If it does than I think we should be reading to the book to help us

> understand reality and not waste our precious resources. What we all

> need,

> in my humble opinion, is a book written for the public and those afflicted

> with mold/chemical illness on what works and what doesn't; how to address

> mold problems, what to do and not to do, how to find qualified contractors

> if that's possible, etc.

>

> If your book addresses these down-to-earth basic issues please email me

> privately your telephone number so I can order a copy.

>

> Houston is full of moldy homes, everyone is talking about NewOrleans, not

> many are mentioning the thousands of homes and buildings damaged from

> Hurricane Rita that caused so much destruction along the East Texas and LA

> areas; not mega cities but very small towns with many poor people who

> don't

> have many choices in having the finances to rebuild or relocate to safer

> areas or running to high altitudes. They can only flee to the nearest

> shelter set up for them. Homes and buildings in Houston from Tropical

> Storm

> almost 5 years ago are still contaminated from mold, people are

> ill,

> many buildings and homes I cannot enter due to my reaction and yes I'm at

> the point where I can allow my body to warn me of the danger. Those

> living

> in them have not been educated or they don't have any viable solutions

> unfortunately.

>

> Rosie

>

>

>

>

> FAIR USE NOTICE:

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...