Guest guest Posted August 19, 2004 Report Share Posted August 19, 2004 Dear All The program to provide free ART requires great commitment. Based on empirical evidence even the program where international NGOs supplied free drugs was beset with short supplies and its consequences. As Dr Joshi rightly pointed out it is a serious problem because it can cause more harm than good if the program cannot be sustained at an individual level. The fact remains that demand will continue to be higher than supply. Hence on one hand the program requires unrelenting pursuit on the other hand it demands extreme responsibility from those who deliver. Thus doctors, medical professional and others responsible for first hand delivery of the medicines should ensure long term sustainablity on a case-by-case basis before starting anyone on the drugs. They should also prioritise on the basis of those who have started the course being sustained before initiating the next person. It is also good news that Cipla is now fulfilling some social responsibility at the National level in its move to supply them cheaper in India. NACO and the hospitals providing free ART, should take up the responsibility in a such a way that they should have alternatives such as directly getting them from the market if need be in order that ultimately the patient is not victimised. At the end of the day the success of the free ART program is entirely based on its sustainability. But I believe it can be done. All it takes is commitment and responsibility. So good luck to it. Ruth Kattumuri London School of Economics E-mail: <r_katts@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.