Pediatricians, ABC and Censorship: Facts Are Scarier Than Fiction - Huffington Post

[Guest guest]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-kirby/pediatricians-abc-and-ce_b_83472.h

tml

Pediatricians, ABC and Censorship: Facts Are Scarier Than Fiction

Posted January 27, 2008 | 04:19 PM (EST)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

----

Read More: AAP, Abc, Asthma, Autism, Censorship, Eli Stone, Mercury,

Vaccines, Breaking News

On Monday, the American Academy of Pediatrics will release the contents of

a foreboding letter sent last week to ABC/Disney executives, demanding they

cancel the January 31 premiere a new legal drama, " Eli Stone, " because it

features a family attorney who successfully argues in court that

mercury-containing flu vaccine caused autism in one child.

The letter, signed by AAP President , borders on near-hysteria

over a fictional television entertainment. It ominously warns that ABC

" will bear responsibility for the needless suffering and potential deaths

of children from parents' decisions not to immunize based on the content of

the episode. "

Dr. calls on ABC to cancel the episode but, anticipating a refusal,

urges executives to run a disclaimer that " no scientific link exists

between vaccines and autism, " if the offending network " persists " in airing

the show.

I share the AAP's concern that parents should not be driven away from

protecting their children from dangerous, even deadly diseases. But parents

are far too smart to base such an important decision as immunization on the

" content of the episode " of a single drama on broadcast television.

In fact, if I were Dr. , I would be far more concerned about real

news happening in the real world - events that not only suggest the

possibility of some sort of link between mercury, vaccines and autism, but

might alarm parents more than any fictional account written for

ratings-grabbing mass entertainment.

If I were Dr. , instead of fretting over a fake family engaged in a

mock trial held in a make-believe court on some LA soundstage, I would be

up at night wondering why the Federal Government recently conceded a real

vaccine-autism lawsuit in a real court and will soon pay a real

(taxpayer-funded) settlement to a real American family and a very real

child with autism.

I would want to know why the Department of Justice agreed that

mercury-containing vaccines " severely aggravated " the autism symptoms in at

least one child, and I would wonder if research into what triggered that

severe aggravation might provide at least some clues into the perpetual

mysteries of the disorder and its causes.

And, if I were Dr. , rather than wringing my hands and trying to

censor a TV-show verdict, I would truly worry about what will happen when

parents realize that the Federal Government has sealed the facts of that

vaccine-autism case - preventing the public (and future plaintiffs) from

viewing what could only be described as " evidence of harm. " I would be

nervous that this secretive action in an actual court (itself reminiscent

of science fiction) might drive parents away from vaccination far more

effectively than any scripted drama.

Furthermore, if I were the top pediatrician in America, I would not be

asking television networks to make sweeping statements such as, " No

scientific link exists " between autism and mercury or vaccines, when highly

respected publications continue to publish new (and very real) data that

roundly debunk what has now become, frankly, a tired piece of misinformation.

If I were the AAP, or ABC for that matter, I would feel downright silly

stating that " no scientific link exists, " so soon after the Journal of

Child Neurology published a study titled, Blood Levels of Mercury Are

Related to Diagnosis of Autism: A Reanalysis of an Important Data Set. I

would also worry about parental reaction to learning that researchers had

done due diligence and reanalyzed data from a prior, hugely influential

study that (erroneously) found zero connection between mercury levels and

autism.

Instead of trying to silence the fictional words of " Eli Stone " co-creators

Greg Berlanti and Marc Guggenheim, I would pay closer attention to the real

words of Journal authors M. DeSoto and Hitlan, who found a

major flaw in the original study that found no link. In fact, they

concluded, " a significant relation does exist between the blood levels of

mercury and diagnosis of an autism spectrum disorder, " and that " hair

sample analysis results offer some support for the idea that persons with

autism may be less efficient ... at eliminating mercury from the blood, "

something that proponents of the mercury-autism hypothesis have long said.

And, I would heed this rather wise warning from the authors: " If there is

any link between autism and mercury, it is absolutely crucial that the

first reports of the question are not falsely stating that no link occurs. "

Another study, freshly out of Harvard, likewise shows a potential link

between mercury and the autopsied brains of young people with autism. The

American Journal of Biochemistry and Biotechnology reports that markers for

oxidative stress was 68.9% higher in autistic brain issue than controls (a

statistically significant result), while mercury levels were 68.2% higher.

And though the mercury results did not quite reach statistical significance

(probably due to the small number of autistic brains studied: 9), the

authors cautioned that, " However, there was a positive correlation between

(oxidative stress and mercury levels), " meaning the two might be associated.

Finally, if part of my AAP job description was to ensure that every

American child is vaccinated as early and often as possible, I would be

hugely apprehensive, not about a new courtroom drama, but rather about a

dramatic new study soon to appear in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical

Immunology

..

In her article, " Delay in DPT vaccination is associated with a reduced risk

of childhood asthma, " Anita Kozyrskyj, an asthma researcher at the

University of Manitoba, combed the medical records of 14,000 children born

in Manitoba in 1995 (when many Canadian shots still contained mercury, by

the way).

Kozyrskyj found that children who received the DPT (diphtheria, pertussis

and tetanus) vaccine at two months of age were 2.63 times more likely to

develop asthma (at a rate of 13.9%) than children who were not given the

shot until after four months of age (5.9%). " We're thinking that maybe if

you delay this allergic response until a bit later, the child's immune

system is more developed and maybe you're not seeing this effect, "

Kozyrskyj told the Winnipeg Free Press, which just broke the story.

No one wants infant children to go unprotected from whooping cough (or

pertussis, the " P " in DPT). But what if delaying that vaccine could have

prevented more than half of the asthma cases in the United States? With

millions of children currently suffering from the disease, at the cost of

billions of dollars a year, would waiting another two months improve the

risk-benefit ratio for society (save for the companies that market those

asthma medications)?

Even more importantly, if too-early vaccination causes asthma in some kids,

could the practice cause other disorders? There is absolutely nothing to

link this vaccine study to autism, of course. But consider the following:

1) Many asthma cases have been linked to autoimmunity. The same with autism.

2) Childhood asthma has been dramatically increasing for two decades. The

same with autism.

3) Most of the children with asthma in the vaccine study were boys. The

same with autism.

Any way you look at it, this study is hardly reassuring news to parents who

are about to vaccinate their kids (though think how comforting it would be

to allow them to delay this shot by two months). Medicine and the media

constantly tell us that all vaccines are safe for all children. When

parents try to jive that information with studies that imply the opposite,

their faith and trust in public health and the immunization program begin

to take a nosedive, along with vaccination rates.

It's not just the broadcast of fiction out of ABC that might drive parents

away from immunization. It is the negation of fact out of the AAP as well.

And if unvaccinated children get sick, will the esteemed Academy also " bear

responsibility, " or just heap it all upon the network?

ABC executives could cave in and cancel the broadcast, but I don't think

they will. And even if America's pediatricians manage to successfully

censor fiction, they will never be able to stifle the facts.

--------------------------------------------------------

Sheri Nakken, former R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath

Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UK

$$ Donations to help in the work - accepted by Paypal account

Voicemail US 530-740-0561

Vaccines - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm or

http://www.wellwithin1.com/vaccine.htm

Vaccine Dangers On-Line courses - http://www.wellwithin1.com/vaccineclass.htm

Reality of the Diseases & Treatment -

http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccineclass.htm

Homeopathy On-Line courses - http://www.wellwithin1.com/homeo.htm

NEXT CLASSES start by email January 9 & 10