Guest guest Posted March 31, 2008 Report Share Posted March 31, 2008 http://www.cryshame.co.uk//index.php?option=com_content & task=view & id=22 & Itemid=9\ 4 Wakefield & MMR In the mid-nineties a group of children were brought to the attention of Dr Wakefield and others by their parents. The children appeared to be suffering from a combination of gastro-intestinal symptoms and a developmental disorder. The developmental disorder was characteristic of a pervasive developmental (or 'autistic spectrum') disorder. In many cases, either parents or professionals had noted a close temporal relationship between exposure to a polyvalent (i.e. not single) measles-containing vaccine (pMCV) and an autistic-like behavioural regression. Prior to this behavioural regression, the children, in the majority of cases, were reported to have met age-appropriate milestones and had generally been considered to be developmentally normal. A subsequent study, published in the Lancet in 1998 reported the characteristics of the presentation of 12 such children with developmental disorder consecutively referred to the Royal Free Hospital. A number of misunderstandings about the background, content and conclusions of this study have resulted from misleading treatment of the issue in both the scientific and non-scientific press. The misunderstanding stems from a misconception, planted in what appears to be an intentional manner by irresponsible and ill informed ‘journalists’. Specifically, the misconception is that the Lancet paper reported on a study that was set up to elucidate the role of MRR in the causation of autism. This interpretation is either hopelessly naïve or intentionally misleading. Either way it is incorrect. The Lancet paper simply reported on the clinical presentation of a series of 12 cases. On taking a routine history, 8 of the children’s parents noted the temporal association between onset of behavioural regression and exposure to a measles containing vaccine. The paper makes it clear that onset of GI symptoms was difficult to ascertain but generally appeared to occur prior to the behavioural regression. At no stage does the paper claim a causal association between MMR vaccine and autism, which is the rather ill informed and naïve interpretation that both the lay population, several ill informed journalists and, rather surprisingly, various members of the scientific community have made. On the contrary the paper makes explicit the fact that ‘We did not prove an association between measles, mumps and rubella vaccine and the syndrome described’. It really couldn’t be stated more clearly than this and leads one to question how many of the paper’s critics understand the first thing about study design. Apparently very few. Whilst such inaccurate interpretations pervade science this one is of particular importance because the folk myth that surrounds the paper forms the basis of an orchestrated offensive against the doctors who were involved in the original investigations. The view that the paper was in some way flawed has been ruthlessly propogated by those who wish to promote the supposed safety of the MMR vaccine and deny its potential role in the causation of developmental regression and GI problems in hundreds of thousands of children worldwide. The imminent GMC hearing holds the paper central to its allegations against the doctors involved and several misinformed bloggers and web-based writers perpetuate the myth daily. The misunderstandings surrounding this work are no longer limited just to the Lancet paper. There is also a total failure by almost all commentators on the subject, to understand the basic hypotheses surrounding the MMR/MR – autism issue. There is a common misconception that the original theory, developed from early clinical observations – states that ‘MMR causes autism’. Period. If the situation were not so tragic it would be comical. The theory, unsurprisingly, is rather more sophisticated than that. It is perhaps timely to restate what has subsequently been referred to as the 'Wakefield Hypothesis' and to direct readers towards subsequent (and earlier) scientific publications whose accreditation in scientific peer-reviewed journals is a matter of undisputed public record. The Wakefield Hypothesis: There exists a subset of children who are vulnerable, for immunological reasons, to developing a particular form of developmental regression following previously normal development, in combination with a novel form of inflammatory bowel disease. Onset, which may be acute or insidious, may be triggered by exposure to a measles containing vaccine, predominantly the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (MMR). Exposure leads to long-term infection with measles virus within key sites, including the intestine, where it is associated with lymphoid hyperplasia and acute and chronic mucosal inflammation. Despite the focus of the popular press on one article, Dr. Wakefield has himself published around 132 scientific papers, many of which directly address the issues originally outlined in this hypothesis. Additionally, a number of studies have been completed whose findings are currently the subject of peer review in the scientific press. Current evidence is clearly available to support every aspect of this hypothesis. Specifically, ongoing, published and presented work provides strong and irrefutable evidence of: * immunological differences present in children with ASD * a particular form of developmental regression * a novel form of inflammatory bowel disease * onset contemporaneous with MMR exposure * long-term infection with measles virus in key sites * presence of lymphoid hyperplasia and acute and chronic mucosal inflammation. The story is by no means over. -------------------------------------------------------- Sheri Nakken, former R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UK Vaccines - http://www.wellwithin1.com/vaccine.htm Vaccine Dangers & Childhood Disease & Homeopathy Email classes start April 18 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.