Guest guest Posted June 3, 2008 Report Share Posted June 3, 2008 Speaking of making up numbers, read on: I just had a very interesting debate with some doc on the radio today. It was on an alternative music station which surprisingly brought on this traditional doc to give advice. Anyway, during a discussion about the flu, the doc spouted the figure of 30K-40K deaths per year. I called in to correct him that these figures, which are usually given by the CDC as 36K, are for the pneumonia and flu deaths combined. Furthermore, the vaccine is notoriously ineffective and contains mercury and aluminum. How do you feel about that, do you think that is a health problem giving mercury and aluminum in vaccines, Dr? His response was that, yes, the figures include pneumonia cases because flu leads to pneumonia, blah, blah.,.. I said, so you think ALL of the pneumonia cases included were due to the flu? Oh, no he says, no way to know that for sure, there are many other causes. Well, Dr. that’s why I question the figures which are used to get people vaccinated. As for the mercury, he knew of no problems and admitted not knowing about aluminum even being in vaccines, let alone causing problems, and the flu vaccine is “highly effective.” I then referred to something he said about balancing risks/benefits, and told him that the comparison was not so simple because when you get the vaccine, you are taking on the immediate risk of vaccine side effects. But when you don’t get it, you are not automatically taking on the risk of disease. You have to be exposed first (he agreed), and likely have to have at least a slightly compromised immune system to come down with something (he didn’t agree—can’t remember his brilliant response). Then somehow measles came up. He (who said he was not a pediatrician, by the way) went on and on about how wonderful the MMR is, that you need to compare the 3 in a million who die from the vaccine against those who die from the disease. I asked, oh, is that 3 in a million a fact, a real statistic? He paused and said yes (liar!). I said gee, I never got the measles and there was no vaccine then. My kids never did either so what would be protecting us? You guessed it—he went into the herd immunity spiel but not before saying that the mercury in the MMR shouldn’t be a problem. I corrected him that there is no mercury in it because it’s a live virus vaccine, and he stuttered and claim there is thimerosal in it and I said, no, there’s no thimerosal it’s a live virus vaccine, but go ahead about the herd immunity (having now discredited himself). He then referred to the “unusual parents” like me who choose not to vax, which I let go since it was apparent to anyone listening that he had just given out incorrect info. Then I said, gee, what about the chicken pox vaccine and the huge number of failures there with all these outbreaks? It makes parents really wonder whether they should have their kids take on the serious risks with so many doubts about the efficacy of the vaccine. He went into some strange talk about how they won’t know until later down the road if this will keep the CP away later in life. I said, not worried here because I had it, as did most of my kids so we’re immune for life. Well, not to scare you he says, that virus will live in you and them forever. I said, not scared here--perfectly fine with it. Then he went on about shingles and how he recommends the new shingles vaccine. I said, oh, yes, shingles. I’m noticing so many cases of it, even in teenagers. I wonder if it’s due to the timing of when the CP vax came out? He didn’t know. Not sure how the rest went. I’ll try to get a tape of it from the station. The next caller continued the conversation, asking about allergic reactions and perhaps it’s due to other components in the vaccines besides the virus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 Nice one, Winnie!!! Sue x -- Yes, they make up numbers on the spot Speaking of making up numbers, read on: I just had a very interesting debate with some doc on the radio today. It was on an alternative music station which surprisingly brought on this traditional doc to give advice. Anyway, during a discussion about the flu, the doc spouted the figure of 30K-40K deaths per year. I called in to correct him that these figures, which are usually given by the CDC as 36K, are for the pneumonia and flu deaths combined. Furthermore, the vaccine is notoriously ineffective and contains mercury and aluminum. How do you feel about that, do you think that is a health problem giving mercury and aluminum in vaccines, Dr? His response was that, yes, the figures include pneumonia cases because flu leads to pneumonia, blah, blah.,.. I said, so you think ALL of the pneumonia cases included were due to the flu? Oh, no he says, no way to know that for sure, there are many other causes. Well, Dr. that’s why I question the figures which are used to get people vaccinated. As for the mercury, he knew of no problems and admitted not knowing about aluminum even being in vaccines, let alone causing problems, and the flu vaccine is “highly effective.” I then referred to something he said about balancing risks/benefits, and told him that the comparison was not so simple because when you get the vaccine, you are taking on the immediate risk of vaccine side effects. But when you don’t get it, you are not automatically taking on the risk of disease. You have to be exposed first (he agreed), and likely have to have at least a slightly compromised immune system to come down with something (he didn’t agree—can’t remember his brilliant response). Then somehow measles came up. He (who said he was not a pediatrician, by the way) went on and on about how wonderful the MMR is, that you need to compare the 3 in a million who die from the vaccine against those who die from the disease. I asked, oh, is that 3 in a million a fact, a real statistic? He paused and said yes (liar!). I said gee, I never got the measles and there was no vaccine then. My kids never did either so what would be protecting us? You guessed it—he went into the herd immunity spiel but not before saying that the mercury in the MMR shouldn’t be a problem. I corrected him that there is no mercury in it because it’s a live virus vaccine, and he stuttered and claim there is thimerosal in it and I said, no, there’s no thimerosal it’s a live virus vaccine, but go ahead about the herd immunity (having now discredited himself). He then referred to the “unusual parents” like me who choose not to vax, which I let go since it was apparent to anyone listening that he had just given out incorrect info. Then I said, gee, what about the chicken pox vaccine and the huge number of failures there with all these outbreaks? It makes parents really wonder whether they should have their kids take on the serious risks with so many doubts about the efficacy of the vaccine. He went into some strange talk about how they won’t know until later down the road if this will keep the CP away later in life. I said, not worried here because I had it, as did most of my kids so we’re immune for life. Well, not to scare you he says, that virus will live in you and them forever I said, not scared here--perfectly fine with it. Then he went on about shingles and how he recommends the new shingles vaccine. I said, oh, yes, shingles. I’m noticing so many cases of it, even in teenagers. I wonder if it’s due to the timing of when the CP vax came out? He didn’t know. Not sure how the rest went. I’ll try to get a tape of it from the station. The next caller continued the conversation, asking about allergic reactions and perhaps it’s due to other components in the vaccines besides the virus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.