WHO CAUGHT LYING IN PUBLIC OVER VACCINES

[Guest guest]

From: " Clifford G. " <cgmiller@...> (regarding

Jayne Donegan's case)

Now don't that beat all - WHO telling outright lies. If you

circulate this please include my address in England so WHO can try to

sue me - note the word " try " .

Sheri Nakken wrote:

>http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/86/6/08-030608/en/index.html

>

>

>Millions of deaths are prevented by vaccination every year, yet

>public anxieties and vaccine scares that ignore rigorous science

>continue to hamper immunization programmes. Jane Parry reports.

>

>

In the Donegan case before the UK's General Medical Council last

August in an exhaustive three week hearing involving 5 medical expert

reports and approaching 400 medical references, the absence of any

" science " was the most remarkable thing.

In particular, not a single paper was produced which established the

safety of any childhood vaccine in use in the UK. A witness of fact

who also was an expert in her own right regarding the testing of

pharmaceutical products confirmed also that what is considered the

gold standard of medical evidence - the placebo controlled randomised

clinical trial is simply not carried out on vaccines - yep, not even

ones for kids. And that was why the expert she sought out Dr

Donegan, for advice about whether to vaccinate her children.

Fortunately, Dr Donegan's advice on vaccination is the only advice

available in the UK which has been proven in rigorous detailed and

extensive legal proceedings to be valid. That cannot be said of the

advice from our Department of Health. Not only was Dr Donegan

acquitted by the GMC, but most unusually they found her defence

proven to the standard of beyond a reasonable doubt.

Whenever WHO claim lives in the third world have been saved, they

refer to " estimates " - guess WHO produces those " estimates " . And are

" estimates " science? Not in this case or in the case of WHO. But

that is not all. There is no " rigorous science " . Medical research

is medical research and not " science " even if they try hard to

pretend it is science. And medicine is not science either. And try

as hard as they can, I am not sure it is truly accurate to describe

any medical research as " rigorous " . Biological systems are a little

too uncertain to be rigorous about everything.

" Clifford G. " <cgmiller@...>

--------------------------------------------------------

Sheri Nakken, former R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath

Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UK

Vaccines - http://www.wellwithin1.com/vaccine.htm

Vaccine Dangers & Homeopathy Online/email courses