The numbers aren't persausive - Gardasil vaccine

[Guest guest]

Reactions to Garadasil vaccine

http://www.infowars.com/?p=3191

" Seven per cent had serious side-effects — " about half " the average of

vaccines overall, "

-- So normal vaccines have an almost 15% (15 out of every 100) of

SERIOUS reaction per the CDC - What is the actual chance of death or

serious ill effect from any of the diseases? Does any disease have a

great than 15% rate of serious problems? --

" The report notes that when Gardasil was being tested in the U.S. before

being licensed, 10 individuals who were in the group that received the

vaccine died, and seven in the placebo group died. None of these deaths

were considered vaccine-related. "

--What does the placebo have in it? All the same crap that the reg

vaccine has, just not the " good stuff " ?--

" It’s estimated that about 1,300 women contract the sexually transmitted

virus each year in Canada. About 400 women in Canada die of cervical

cancer annually — making it the second most common type of cancer for

women between the age of 20 and 44. "

--It's my understanding that the vaccine doesn't target all types of the

virus only 3-5? (Is that true?) So, of the 1300 how many are truly

protected by the vaccine, if it were to work? 400 Women die of cervical

cancer - again, what % of that would actually be covered by the vaccine?

Also, 400 SEVERE reactions in young girls, under the age of 20 means

vaccinating 6000 girls. The numbers of potential risk are staggering

compared to the touted benefits of this vaccine. It makes me sick, and

it bugs me that the numbers are not put out in consistent, layman's

terms. Evenso, this math isn't tough. 14% Severe reactions. Incredible. --

Kathy

[Guest guest]

Great questions, Kathy.

I'll add that the 15% is an average (and of course the rate is higher since not

all are reported). So that means some vaccines have a higher rate of serious

reactions. How much higher? Which ones? What are the supposed effectiveness

rates claimed for those vaccines? How serious are the diseases those particular

vaccines are for?

Winnie

The numbers aren't persausive - Gardasil vaccine

Vaccinations

> Reactions to Garadasil vaccine

> http://www.infowars.com/?p=3191

>

> " Seven per cent had serious side-effects — " about half " the

> average of

> vaccines overall, "

> -- So normal vaccines have an almost 15% (15 out of every 100)

> of

> SERIOUS reaction per the CDC - What is the actual chance of

> death or

> serious ill effect from any of the diseases? Does any disease

> have a

> great than 15% rate of serious problems? --

>

> " The report notes that when Gardasil was being tested in the

> U.S. before

> being licensed, 10 individuals who were in the group that

> received the

> vaccine died, and seven in the placebo group died. None of these

> deaths

> were considered vaccine-related. "

> --What does the placebo have in it? All the same crap that the

> reg

> vaccine has, just not the " good stuff " ?--

>

> " It’s estimated that about 1,300 women contract the sexually

> transmitted

> virus each year in Canada. About 400 women in Canada die of

> cervical

> cancer annually — making it the second most common type of

> cancer for

> women between the age of 20 and 44. "

> --It's my understanding that the vaccine doesn't target all

> types of the

> virus only 3-5? (Is that true?) So, of the 1300 how many are

> truly

> protected by the vaccine, if it were to work? 400 Women die of

> cervical

> cancer - again, what % of that would actually be covered by the

> vaccine?

> Also, 400 SEVERE reactions in young girls, under the age of 20

> means

> vaccinating 6000 girls. The numbers of potential risk are

> staggering

> compared to the touted benefits of this vaccine. It makes me

> sick, and

> it bugs me that the numbers are not put out in consistent,

> layman's

> terms. Evenso, this math isn't tough. 14% Severe reactions.

> Incredible. --

>

> Kathy

>

>

> ------------------------------------

>

>