United States citizens are increasingly enslaved, manipulated and murdered by corporations, and very few of them seem to realize it!

[Guest guest]

<http://www.pr-inside.com/united-states-citizens-are-increasingly-enslaved-r8086\

65.htm>http://www.pr-inside.com/united-states-citizens-are-increasingly-enslaved\

-r808665.htm

United States citizens are increasingly enslaved,

manipulated and murdered by corporations, and

very few of them seem to realize it!

2008-09-16 13:37:30 - US Attorney Jeff was

sweating on August 6, as he laid out his case

against the late Dr. Bruce Ivins at a news

conference­and with good reason. Anyone familiar

with the case is well aware that Dr. Ivins was

railroaded, and that the news conference was a flimsy web of lies.

Washington DC-based journalist Sheila Casey and

attorney/peace activist Barry Kissin write:

Ivins had nothing to do with the 2001 anthrax

attacks. The attacks were almost certainly

carried out by the only group that had the means

to produce the highly weaponized anthrax in the

letters: the CIA, its contractor Battelle

Memorial Institute of West Jefferson, Ohio, and the Army at Dugway in Utah.

The DOJ-FBI frame-up of Ivins rests heavily upon

the claim of new advances in genetic testing

which supposedly prove that the killer anthrax

could have come only from Ivins' flask. Jeff

stated: " The FBI sought out the best

experts in the scientific community and, over

time, four highly sensitive and specific tests

were developed that were capable of detecting the

unique qualities of the anthrax used in the 2001 attacks. "

This is a distraction. No special tests were

required to assess the genetic heritage of the

Ames strain in the envelopes. The Washington Post

reported on December 16, 2001 that " only five

laboratories, so far, have been found to have

spores with perfect genetic matches to those in the Senate letters. "

The distinguishing feature of the anthrax that

killed five people in 2001 is not related to its

genes. What made that anthrax unique was that it

was highly weaponized. Anthrax is a common

pathogen found in the soil in many places. It

doesn't become a potential weapon unless produced

in such a way that it behaves like a gas,

floating easily in the air and deep into a

victim's lungs. The anthrax used in the attacks was beyond cutting edge.

A. , former assistant secretary

for the Office of Public Health Preparedness at

the Department of Health and Human Services, told

Science magazine: " It just didn't have to be that good " to be lethal.

Why the killer anthrax was so deadly?

Precisely-sized particles­1.5 to 5 microns.

Anything smaller is exhaled, anything larger

tends to get caught either in the nose or in the cilia in the trachea.

Coated with silica. The silica acted as a buffer,

preventing spores from adhering to one another.

The silica on the attack anthrax rested on a thin

layer of polymerized glass, which is a highly

advanced technique for coating anthrax spores. To

do this required a " spray dryer, " the cheapest of

which sells for $50,000. The lyophilizer in

Ivins' lab is used to dry anthrax, but can NOT be

used to coat the spores with silica. Ivins did not have a spray dryer.

Highly concentrated. The letter to Senator

Daschle's office contained two grams of anthrax,

about the weight of a dime. Each gram contained a

trillion pure spores of anthrax, or enough to kill 200 million people.

Electrically charged. The same charge on each

particle (of spores) caused the particles to

repel each other and thus to spread out into the

room after the envelope was opened.

No electrostatic charge. The particles were

specially treated to eliminate electrostatic charges so they float in the air

It is these attributes of the anthrax­not its

genetic heritage­which made it so unique and so lethal.

The source of the anthrax was clear in 2001

US Attorney Jeff characterized a flask in

Dr. Ivin's possession as " the murder weapon. " But

a December 12, 2001 article in the Baltimore Sun

stated: For nearly a decade, US Army scientists

at Dugway Proving Ground in Utah have made small

quantities of weapons-grade anthrax that is

virtually identical to the powdery spores used in

the mail attacks that have killed five people.

The article refers to Dugway as " the only site in

the United States where weapons-grade anthrax has

been made in recent years, " and also includes

this: Dugway's production of weapons-grade

anthrax, which has never before been publicly

revealed, is apparently the first by the U.S.

government since President M. Nixon

ordered the US offensive bio-warfare program closed in 1969.

The following day, The Washington Post echoed the

Sun article: An Army biological and chemical

warfare facility in Utah has been quietly

developing a virulent, weapons-grade formulation

of anthrax spores since at least 1992.

On December 16, 2001, The Washington Post

corroborated the Sun report by stating that

" Dugway is the only facility known in recent

years to have processed anthrax spores into the

powdery form that is most easily inhaled, " also

stating, " Army officials in Washington said

yesterday that Fort Detrick does not have the

equipment for making dried anthrax spores. "

On September 4, 2001, The New York Times exposed:

Over the past several years, the United States

has embarked on a program of secret research on

biological weapons . . . even the [Clinton] White

House was unaware of their full scope. The

projects, which have not been previously

disclosed . . . have been embraced by the Bush

administration, which intends to expand them.

These projects involve the CIA, Battelle Memorial

Laboratories in West Jefferson, Ohio, and the Army at Dugway in Utah.

The need to keep such projects secret was a

significant reason behind President Bush's recent

rejection of a draft agreement to strengthen the

germ-weapons treaty, (the 1972 Biological Weapons

Convention) which has been signed by 143 nations.

Had the treaty been strengthened, the Dugway and

West Jefferson sites would have been subject to

international inspections. It is important to

note that Battelle not only operates its labs in

West Jefferson, but also is contracted by the

Army to operate the labs at Dugway.

The DOJ-FBI news conference on August 6, 2008,

was a deliberate attempt to divert attention from

the secret anthrax weaponization projects by

pinning the crimes on a dead man. So far the

DOJ-FBI have succeeded in covering up the real

perpetrators of the crime, concealing the illegal

weapons program, and persuading many that it is

time to close the investigation.

Dr. Ivins was an immunologist; he had neither the

knowledge nor the equipment to produce the

silica-coated, electro-statically charged, 1.5 to

5 micron sized, one trillion spore per gram

anthrax that was mailed to Senators Leahy and

Daschle. The DOJ has made much of the fact that

Ivins worked 45 extra hours in September and

October of 2001. Yet when the FBI attempted to

reverse engineer the weaponized anthrax from the

attacks, they admitted after a year of trying

that they were unable to come up with a product

as potent as that in the letters.

Scientists doubt FBI's story

As far back as October 28, 2002, The Washington

Post reported that bio-weapons experts were

skeptical about the view that the anthrax in the

letters could have come from a lone nut: 'In my

opinion, there are maybe four or five people in

the whole country who might be able to make this

stuff, and I'm one of them,' said O.

Spertzel, former deputy commander of USAMRIID

(the Army bio-defense facility at Detrick). 'And

even with a good lab and staff to help run it, it

might take me a year to come up with a product as good.'

Writing in The New York Times on August 9, 2008,

Gerry s, an assistant professor of

microbiology at the University of Wyoming,

described the envelopes' contents as " a

startlingly refined weapons-grade anthrax spore

preparation, the likes of which had never been

seen before by personnel at Fort Detrick. " He

continued: " It is extremely improbable that this

type of preparation could ever have been produced

at Fort Detrick, certainly not of the grade and

quality found in that envelope. "

Abundant evidence that Ivins is innocent

Ivins passed two polygraph tests and no link was

made between his handwriting and that on the

anthrax letters. Investigators were so frustrated

at Ivins passing the polygraph tests that they

searched his house for books or articles on how

to fool a polygraph, but found none. US Attorney

Jeff stated that the investigators zeroed

in on Ivins when they " conducted additional

investigative steps, " and thus were " able to

narrow the focus even further, exclude

individuals, and that left us looking at Dr.

Ivins. " Those " additional investigative steps "

were polygraph tests. Where passing a polygraph

test was enough to exclude certain people, it did not exclude Ivins.

Ivins' car, work locker, safe deposit box and

house were thoroughly swabbed for anthrax spores

multiple times over the space of years; not a

single spore was found, although the killer

anthrax was so highly weaponized that it behaved

like a gas and was very difficult to contain.

None of the materials in the mailings were found

at his house: not the tape, the envelopes, nor

the pen used to write the letters. There isn't

one piece of evidence placing him in New Jersey

at the time the letters were mailed: not a credit

card receipt, restaurant receipt, nor a witness.

On August 3, 2008, Glen Greenwald wrote in Salon:

" It is so vital to emphasize that not a shred of

evidence has yet been presented that the

now-deceased Bruce Ivins played any role in the

anthrax attacks, let alone that he was the sole

or even primary culprit. Nonetheless, just as

they did with Hatfill, the media (with

some notable and important exceptions) are

reporting this case as though the matter is resolved. "

Bruce Ivins: juggler, Red Cross volunteer, pianist

Jeff 's case against Ivins rests heavily on

claims that Ivins was mentally ill. If Ivins was

truly so unhinged, why was he allowed to work

with toxic substances? His security clearance was

never revoked. Certainly a brilliant homicidal

serial killer who is determined to avoid

detection would immediately get rid of the Ames

strain with the incriminating genotype in his

flask, if he had used it to make weaponized

powder and kill five people. Yet years later, the

same genotype was still in Ivins' lab! The DOJ

and FBI ask us to believe that Ivins launched the

attacks because his vaccine research was not

going well and he feared he might lose his job.

It's just not a plausible motivation.

In 2003, Ivins received the Decoration for

Exceptional Civilian Service­the highest award

given to the Defense Department's civilian

employees. He had been a respected scientist at

USAMRIID for 35 years and had a very secure job.

Ivins had been married for 33 years. He played

keyboard at his local church, he was a member of

the American Red Cross, an avid juggler and

founder of the Frederick Jugglers. He also played

keyboards in a Celtic band and would often

compose and play songs for coworkers who were

moving to new jobs. The FBI focused on him as a

probable fall guy in 2006, and for two years was

all over him, repeatedly questioning him,

searching his home, car and office, and

confronting him and his family in public with

accusations that he had " killed people. " His

daughter was shown pictures of dead anthrax

victims and told " your father did this. " His son

was promised $2.5 million and a sports car of his

choice if he would implicate his father in the

anthrax attacks. Who among us would not resort to

drink, or drugs, or fantasies of revenge under those circumstances?

Who had the expertise to weaponize anthrax?

C. III, and Ken Alibek.

was the originator of the first anthrax

weaponization process. He has five patents on

anthrax weaponization and wrote a paper in 1999

setting out exactly what an anthrax attack by

mail would look like. 's scenario is very

similar to what actually happened in 2001. For

example, he suggests no more than 2.5 grams of

anthrax per envelope; the envelopes contained two

grams. One footnote in his paper reveals " we now

have the ability to purify to one trillion spores

per gram. " was a consultant to

the CIA, Battelle, the Army, the DIA and the FBI on bio-weapons.

Ken Alibek headed up the Soviet bio-weapon

programs until defecting to the USA in 1992. He

brought with him the technology that was key in

the anthrax attacks: using polymerized glass to

coat anthrax spores. He worked for Battelle Memorial Institute in the late 90s.

These men had to have been instrumental in

developing the technology used in the 2001 anthrax attacks.

Who can control the FBI, DOJ and the media?

The significance of the railroading of the

deceased Ivins cannot be overstated. This

railroading is not a matter of incompetence. In

detail after detail, the joint FBI-DOJ

prosecution deliberately lies, evades and

obfuscates in a desperate attempt to pin blame

somewhere and close the case. (A transcript of

the entire August 6 news conference is available

on npr.org, titled " DOJ News Conference On Bruce Ivins)

US Attorney Jeff states at the news

conference that the envelopes used in the attacks

were " very likely sold at a post office in the

Frederick, Md. area, " and that Ivins had a post

office box there. This is another outright lie.

's own application for a search warrant

stated: -envelopes with printing defects,

identical to printing defects identified on the

envelopes utilized in the anthrax attacks during

the fall of 2001, were collected from the Fairfax

Main post office in Fairfax, Virginia, and the

Cumberland and Elkton post offices in land.

and his supervisors at DOJ must be hoping

that no one will notice or care that they are

blatantly lying about their evidence against Ivins.

Reading the transcript, it is striking how often

Jeff and ph Persichini refuse to

answer questions. They either refer reporters to

the Department of Defense (which is not holding a

news conference) or to the documents they have

been given. When asked when their all new,

ground-breaking DNA research would be published,

replies " I'm not going to comment on (that

When asked a direct question about how many

others were investigated other than Ivins,

replies " I'm not going to get into the details. "

Not only does he not get into the details, he

doesn't even give us the broad strokes. When

asked how he can be so sure that there wasn't

another person involved, replies: The

evidence I described in my statement, and that

I've described throughout this

question-and-answer period, as I said, led us to

conclude that Dr. Ivins is the person who

committed this crime. We are confident, based on

the evidence we have, that we could prove this case beyond a reasonable doubt.

In other words, he doesn't answer.

Honest citizens must ask themselves: who are the FBI and DOJ protecting?

Who has the ability to control and corrupt an

investigation of this importance?

And why, after sitting through a news conference

that is obviously a hastily constructed web of

lies, have so many journalists dutifully reported

the story just as instructed by Jeff ?

We no longer have a working government in the

United States ... what we have are functionaries

in various departments­Congress, FBI, DOJ,

CIA­who take their orders from the corporations

who make vast sums of money waging war and

selling vaccines. Their influence extends to the

major media outlets who control the flow of

information to the American people. We are

increasingly enslaved, manipulated and murdered

by these corporations, and very few of us seem to realize it.

Sheila Casey is a DC based journalist. Her work

has appeared in The Denver Post, Buzz Flash,

Common Dreams and Dissident Voice. She blogs at www.sheilacasey.com/

Barry Kissin is an attorney/peace activist based

in Frederick, MD, home of Fort Detrick, and can

be contacted at <mailto:barrykissin%40hotmail.com>barrykissin@...

--------------------------------------------------------

Sheri Nakken, former R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath

Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UK

Vaccines - http://www.wellwithin1.com/vaccine.htm

Vaccine Dangers & Homeopathy Online/email courses - next classes Sept 10, 2008