Guest guest Posted April 21, 2004 Report Share Posted April 21, 2004 FACTORS DETERMINING THE PERSISTENCE OF THE VIRUS IN PATIENTS ON HAART – RESOURCE LIMITED COUNTRY SETTING-A PILOT STUDY. Dr. Phanender.Ketha, M.D. Nodal Officer for control of AIDS, Project implementation plan, Phase II, National AIDS Control Organisation, India., Pulmonologist, Civil Assistant Surgeon, Government E.S.I. Hospital, Visakhapatnam –5, Andhra Pradesh (India). E-mail: <drkphane@...> Background: Due to various social factors, the HAART which is provided to the patients under the social security schemes, shows failure. The factors noted are: At the patient's end, the patient in fear of the social ostracism, changes the place of residence,get absconded from the duty or goes on unauthorized absence leading to failure to contribute money to the social security schemes, illiteracy & ignorance leading to improper dose and dosage, family withdrawal, poor health education facilities, social & interfamilial problems with the spouse, social stigma due to a poor understanding by the society about the means of transmission of HIV , patient's inability to access the officers at the work to sort out certain issues regarding the documentation and the eligibility for medical benefit. At the healthcare setting, inadequate contribution of the patient to the social security scheme makes them ineligible for the medical benefits, patients come alone to the hospital with great difficulty without an attendant leading to difficulties in attending the emergencies, improper provision of the documents required for obtaining the medical benefit, etc. A clinical study of the treatment outcomes of Highly Active Anti- Retroviral Therapy in North Costal Andhra among thirty patients, HIV infected with low CD4 counts who are on Anti-retroviral therapy for a period of 1 ½ year, was done. Material and Methods: Initially screened with rapid test(tridot) followed by by western blot testing,CD4 counts (flow cytometry) evaluation and Viral Load estimations (RT PCR), HAART started appropriately and monitered periodically, evaluated for the results. Results: Overall results are that there is no mortality, there are two cases of clinical failure and considering the immunological failure in whom viral load was done (only 1/3 of the total patients). 66.6% were showing minimal viremia, 33.3% of cases showed viremia more than 20,000. Viral load done in 9 cases only, out of them 6 patients have viremia less than 20,000, one out of the 6 patients has undetectable viremia, 3 patients have viremia below 10,000, 2 patients have viremia in between 10,000 and 20,000. Conclusion: We conclude with guidelines for best practices as well as recommendations for future research. http://www.hiv-workshop.com/nouveau_fichier100.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2004 Report Share Posted April 21, 2004 Dear Forum, The observations around treatment failure and potential for drug resistance are well noted in the report by the good doctor from NACO. The same degree of failure and resistance impacted on TB patients for many of the same reasons not the least of which can be economic or unreasonably complex benefit claiming procedures. Hospitals can be creative because the repetitiveness of the claiming process whilst mystifying to the individual will be quite transparent to hospital allied health staff. Without losing sight of the main objective and that is a decline in mortality and better prevention we need to work harder at ensuring patients understand how the medicine works so that they can appreciate the need for good adherence regimes. Using D.O.T. principles we can be very creative in helping in this process. Care and Support volunteers can help overcome the stigma associated with living with the disease and these need to be cultivated in communities where higher prevalence exists without identifying individuals. Dosit boxes can carry medicines required for a week at a time and as well as serving as a reminder for taking the medicine they also double as an adherence monitoring device. How many doses did you miss this week? A very wrong question of course because it infers poor performance and judgement. Eventually family members can help in the monitoring and D.O.T. processes as can the use of SMS messaging when personal attendance is restricted. What we need is creativity to succeed not resignation to failure. Congratulations for the picture of the results gained from good adherence practices. Should failure become apparent due to medicine quality this monitoring will immediately make the problem apparent and regular random sampling should ensure counterfeit medicine can be readily detected. Geoffrey E-mail:<gheaviside@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.