RE: Which vaccines if any do you do?

[Guest guest]

AMEN!!! Well put, Steph.

On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 7:07 AM, Shock <havefaith@...> wrote:

> My thoughts, and I know I'm not alone, are that I'd rather my child

> get a disease because I DIDN'T do something, especially since they

> will most likely make it through said illness stronger,than to have a

> vaccine damaged child because of something I DID do.

[Guest guest]

Yes, very well put. I totally agree.

Winnie

Re: Which vaccines if any do you do?

" Vaccinations "

> My thoughts, and I know I'm not alone, are that I'd rather my

> child

> get a disease because I DIDN'T do something, especially since

> they

> will most likely make it through said illness stronger,than to

> have a

> vaccine damaged child because of something I DID do.

>

> Steph

>

>

[Guest guest]

> First,

> considering natural diseases cycles which pick & fall from time to

> time.

*** Most diseases are cyclical, true. The route of exposure is far more

important than what is being portrayed. Immune response within any

given cell depends upon its initial injury. Injected antigens (and

their friends) assault the cells in a way that could never occur in

nature. An animal (or human) that has been injected with an attenuated

version of a disease cannot eliminate the disease entirely, as the

classical pathway ingited by the initial exposure is based on humoral

immunity. It just bounces about inside the host trying to dissipate,

which is then usually suppressed by conventional methods.

Secondly, classifying diseases differently and/or not diagnosing

> correctly because if person is vaccinated many doctors assume it

can't

> be the disease vaccinated against. So is this a theory about

injecting

> a chronic case; are there any solid proof?

*** Why would an animal waste its resources creating antibodies to a

disease that is not a true threat? An animal (or human) that is

continually injected with disease will eventually continue to circulate

antibodies to the disease, as the host perceives a genuine threat.

Creating antibodies requires energy, and the continued creation of them

in the absence of true disease IS a low level chronic infection. It is

a common misconception that antibodies are required for the host to

fight infection. The innate immune response is totally nonspecific,

and needs no memory. The problem is that humans don't think it works

and it needs to be manipulated by scientists in order to perform as

Mother Nature intended.

unherdof

[Guest guest]

excellent.. thank you!

 

Arianna Mojica-   (UCC 1-207/1-103) 

~~~ " All rights not demanded are presumed waived " . ~ Thurston

________________________________

From: absolutely_unherdof <moon.gemini.sun@...>

Vaccinations

Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 11:54:28 AM

Subject: Re: Which vaccines if any do you do?

> First,

> considering natural diseases cycles which pick & fall from time to

> time.

*** Most diseases are cyclical, true. The route of exposure is far more

important than what is being portrayed. Immune response within any

given cell depends upon its initial injury. Injected antigens (and

their friends) assault the cells in a way that could never occur in

nature. An animal (or human) that has been injected with an attenuated

version of a disease cannot eliminate the disease entirely, as the

classical pathway ingited by the initial exposure is based on humoral

immunity. It just bounces about inside the host trying to dissipate,

which is then usually suppressed by conventional methods.

Secondly, classifying diseases differently and/or not diagnosing

> correctly because if person is vaccinated many doctors assume it

can't

> be the disease vaccinated against. So is this a theory about

injecting

> a chronic case; are there any solid proof?

*** Why would an animal waste its resources creating antibodies to a

disease that is not a true threat? An animal (or human) that is

continually injected with disease will eventually continue to circulate

antibodies to the disease, as the host perceives a genuine threat.

Creating antibodies requires energy, and the continued creation of them

in the absence of true disease IS a low level chronic infection. It is

a common misconception that antibodies are required for the host to

fight infection. The innate immune response is totally nonspecific,

and needs no memory. The problem is that humans don't think it works

and it needs to be manipulated by scientists in order to perform as

Mother Nature intended.

unherdof

~~~ " The only safe vaccine is a vaccine that is never used " -- Dr. A.

, National Institutes of Health

~~~A truth¢s initial commotion is directly proportional to how deeply the lie

was believed...When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the

masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its

speaker, a raving lunatic. " Dresden

www.vaclib.org 

www.909shot.com

 http://www.vacinfo.org/ 

http://www.moorbows.com/http://www.momtoanangel.net/ingred.htmhttp://www.vran.or\

g/