BMJ Rapid Response/Latta/Shaken Baby

[Guest guest]

http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/eletters/328/7442/719#54638

Will anyone listen now? 26 March 2004

s m latta,

director

po16

Send response to journal:

Re: will anyone listen now?

Email s m latta

It is long overdue these issues were raised. Shaken baby syndrome or is it

now known as shaken impact baby syndrome? was seen for what it is a lot of

opinion will very little scientific basis.

We are told it is made up of three medical signs. Retinal bleeding, brain

bleeding and fractures and or any other physical signs of abuse.

Retinal bleeding has long been known to be caused through many reasons one

of which is abuse. Birth trauma, hematological problems, short falls, lack

of oxygen are others but not all.

Bleeding to the brain, lack of oxygen, birth trauma,falls and abuse are

just a few reasons for this that are at present known. This is an area of

which a lot more investigation needs to be implimented prior to pointing

the finger of abuse. It is simply not known just how great a force of

shaking is required to caue bleeding to the brain.

Fractures- It is not know what force is required to cause fractures in

babies. In court we have heard by selfmade radiological court experts that

is is a force that amounts to the same as an adult standing or stamping on

a baby. Said many times but i have yet to find the scientifict or medical

papers to back this up. A number of clinical non abuse reasons can be found

for calcificaton on bones. It has been known that radiologists will say

that fractures cannot be caused through CPR and later have pathologists say

that this is possible (T Patel Trial). It has also been known that

radiologists will find fractures, parents charged, children taken into care

and then later it is found that there were in fact no fractures. Charges

dropped and children returned.

The simple fact is that there is simply not enough known about shaken baby

syndrome. Not enough to send people to prison off the back of it.

The protection of children is paramount, this must include the protection

of emotional well being, false accusations and the effects of this on a

family must also be taken into account.

Police, social services and the medical world need to look at each case

with open eyes. Medical history and family background must all be looked at

in detail prior to pointing the finger of abuse.

Is it helpful that training CD roms are used on how to prosecute parents

for SBS, these are used by social services and the police. This simply can

not be right, each case needs to be looked at. The death of a baby when the

parents can not explain why is no reason to think murder first rather than

anything else off of the back of the SBS thinking that can not back itself

up with science.

If other reasons are the cause of ill health or death then lets get some

funding into finding why, to avoid ill health or death.

Child abuse is a sad reality and this is not lost on me, i just think that

it is easy to say a set of symptoms are abuse when it is clear that

medicine still has many grey areas. The above are just three of them.

Competing interests: None declared

--------------------------------------------------------

Sheri Nakken, former R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath

Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UK

Vaccines - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm or

http://www.wellwithin1.com/vaccine.htm

Vaccine Dangers & Homeopathy Online/email courses start in December 2008

http://www.wellwithin1.com/vaccineclass.htm or

http://www.wellwithin1.com/homeo.htm