Guest guest Posted September 1, 2003 Report Share Posted September 1, 2003 Dear Policy Maker You may/ will become positive, but ARV is not for you. One of my friend OJA (name changed), age -39 [married and has 3 (-three) children]. He has a HIV infected brother with AIDS (CD-4 count below 50). He does the home care for his brother (since last 4-5 years) and situation demand him for injecting his brother at mid-night. He had an accidental needle injury on 23rd of August 2003 (mid night) while giving injection. He was aware of the precaution and took ARV (for the night) from one PLWHA and borrowed for 2 days course. He had reported the incident to Jawaharal Nehru Hospital IN iMPHAL, Porompat on 26th August 2003. He was asked to procure ARV drugs for PEP since PEP is only for Hospital staff and not meant to be given to him as per the Rules and Regulation of Manipur State AIDS Control Society(MACS). He was referred to MACS for the ARV drugs. This was the same case when Regional Institute of Medical Science (RIMS), Lamphel was approached and told to approach MACS. PEP is only meant for the Govt. Hospital staff and Care provider of Project implemented by State AIDS Control Society, as per the Rules and Regulation of National AIDS Control Society was the verbal consolation got from Manipur State AIDS Control Society and told to approach NGOs that can avail the drugs or to procure the drugs from a pharmacy. He could not procure the ARV drugs in time due to financial constraints (being wage earner) since the cost of the drug cost more than Rs. 3000/- for the course. He is financially drained since he has been procuring OI drugs for his brother as his brother got infected with HIV (through consensual multiple sexual partners, and not as an IVDUs) and is not getting any benefit (say OI drugs) from the TIs project implemented in Manipur. Mr. OJA is at the very High Risk of getting the HIV as he could not procure the Drugs in time. This is the situation of Misconception regarding Prevention and Control of HIV epidemic in the general population as per the NACO programme. We should be grateful to such brother who has been giving home care since the multi-facet dimension of AIDS is above the service rendered by Service provider of our state and will be the case in other States. We had borrowed money and procured drugs for the present. What about others? Why is it that PEP is not made available to them? Who will support his family in a long run if he is infected? What is the concept of Prevention and Control as per NACO norms? I hope NACO will have a second thought for such situations. Debeshwar S. Ak. Programme Manager FXB- Manipur Branch e-MAIL: <fxbmanipur@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.